Mattflaschen

See my talk page on English Wikipedia.

Image:Arancio_striato_blu.svg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 22:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Great Job!

Hey you did a great job, I have that problem in rendering Inkscape's png into svg format, I will try your tip about it. Well Matt, have a wonderfull year 2008! OK.

Sincerely, -JohnManuel 21:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Iron Age Italy.png

no thanks for deleting this image after giving me 7 days' warning, over Christmas. I was the author of this map. I uploaded it at a time when it was still good enough to say "I made it". I am not sure if I still keep a copy anywhere. Can you have it undeleted please? It is rather important to several Wikipedia articles, and I certainly won't spend another half day re-drawing it. --Dbachmann 09:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I didn't delete it, and I can't undelete it, because I'm not an admin on Commons. I tagged it in good faith, and didn't mean to "ambush" you. However, it's okay, because it can be undeleted. I've started a section at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Image:Iron_Age_Italy.png; you may wish to comment. Sorry for the trouble. Superm401 - Talk 15:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

PD-old and adminship

Hello. I have seen you adding {{PD-old-100}} while {{PD-old}} is not clear enough. Speaking of translated tags, if you can go through all images tagged PD-old, I will consider it easier to simply move the translated tags and change "70" to "100". In addition, {{PD-Art}} will assume PD-old if nothing else specified. That will require attentions as well.

While seeing your commitment to make license tags clearer, are you interested in becoming an administrator here? If yes, I will nominate you when you are ready. You have the choice to accept or decline my offer.--Jusjih 20:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC) (administering 11 Wiki sites)

I have replied at Template_talk:PD-old#Additional_templates to explain why I consider PD-old-75 and PD-old-80 needed.--Jusjih 01:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fruit Stall in Barcelona Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Dprk pyongyang hotel rugen 05 s.jpg

Hello, Superm401. What's wrong with that image? I specified who created this work. Why do you think copyright status is unclear? At the bottom of source page you can see "доступно в соответствии с GNU Free Documentation License" message, which means "available according to GNU Free Documentation License". I uploaded several images from that site, and I don't want them to be deleted. --Dstary 12:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

ARS trademark

I saw you marked a couple of the ARS logos as trademarked... out of curiosity, where do you see that? I did an online search at www.uspto.gov before (and did another just now), and did not see any registered trademark. I'm just wondering if there is somewhere better I should be searching. Thanks :-) Carl Lindberg 05:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough on the common-law trademark. Although, the 50th anniversary was in 2003, so I don't think they really use that much anymore, and it may have lapsed. I think folks used it for the license template since it looks nicer than their usual logo ;-) I normally just use that template for registered trademarks though, since as you say, just about any logo is a common-law trademark, so I'm not sure that always needs specifying (doesn't hurt though). US government seals/logos are additionally protected by non-copyright and non-trademark law, so I tend to use the insignia template on those, unless they are registered trademarks too in which case I use both. Thanks for replying though. Carl Lindberg 05:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Scylla Louvre CA1341.jpg

Hi! I'm bit surprised by your adding a PD-Art license to this picture: the object depicted here is not a two-dimensional work of art, so Bridgeman vs. Corel would not apply. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 17:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Scotland Yard

You requested higher resolution of Scotland Yard triangloid. Now uploaded Image:New Scotland Yard sign 2.jpg, Image:New Scotland Yard sign 1.jpg, Image:New Scotland Yard sign 3.jpg, Image:New Scotland Yard sign 4.jpg, Image:New Scotland Yard sign 5.jpg. Man vyi 20:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: {{{category}}}

The {{{category}}} parameter is a just a convention used to make template auto-categorizing optional. Inputing an empty string prevents the template from adding a tagged page to any categories. This is very useful for template documentation. Like on COM:T. You may be familiar with {{Tlrow}}, this makes use of it. You can also do it manually as I showed above. Take for example: {{{category|default categories}}}. If you assign anything (usually nothing) to category (i.e. {{template_name|category=}}) this will over ride any default categories the template normally assigns. Rocket000 03:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... not that I know of, but that's not a bad idea. I'm guess it would be fairly simple to do. The only issue I see it that the majority of templates that don't make use of it already are license tags, which means most of them are heavily used and having a bot edit them all in a short amount of time would send the job queue skyrocketing. I usually only add it when I'm cleaning out a category and there are pages that don't belong there (because a certain template was used on them as an example). Fortunately, nearly all our maintenance templates have it. As you can see on COM:T, there's only one category it's not suppose to be in (something that can't be solve with {{{category}}}). Rocket000 03:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Edit link in {{VIC-thumb}}

Thanks for adding that edit link there. I have been wanting to do that for a long time but did not know how to do it. Ideally, the edit link should only be there when status=nominated|supported|opposed|discussed|withdrawn though. -- Slaunger 10:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Template help?

Hi Superm401, I would like to ask two favours. You seem to have quite some capabilities when it comes to templates, and I appreciate your recent help with improving some of the Valued image templates. I am stuck with two template problems relating to COM:VI, see here and here. Could you help? -- Slaunger 15:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

re:Long khanh fallen

Story behind the photo at top of page: Photo by then PFC Paul Epley "The Agony of War." On August, 14, 1966 PFC Daryl Raymond Corfman, Company A, 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade (Separate) was killed by mortar fire during operation "Aurora Two". He was the 4th Battalion's first KIA as a result of direct enemy actions. His squad leader, Sgt. Daniel Eugene Spencer Jr., of Bend, Oregon, stares down at his fallen comrade. Spencer was later killed 11-12-1968, in action with the 1st Special Forces. SP4 Ruediger Richter (Columbus, Georgia), LZ control, watches the sky for the medical evacuation helicopter, his battle weary eyes to the heavens, as if to ask why? Photo taken Long Khanah province, Vietnam.[1]

high res file from here http://narademo.umiacs.umd.edu/cgi-bin/isadg/viewobject.pl?object=69823 Movieevery 21:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Valued images evaluation

Dear Superm401,

This is a standard message to the 18 different users who so far have been involved in testing Valued images candidates as either a nominator, reviewer or project editor. We are interested in hearing what you think about the project and what your positive and negative experiences have been. We would be grateful if you would voice your opinion here. Thank you,

-- Slaunger 19:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Image:Alison Lapper Pregnant.jpg

Well, you were right on one point: I probably shouldn't have speedy kept it. Meanwhile, try not being so rude. I can tolerate that when people are right, but you're not: deletion requests do not have to take seven days. That is not and has never been a rule here, so please don't tell me never to remove deletion tags. Cheers. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 03:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Kay. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 03:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Alison Lapper

Image:Alison Lapper Pregnant.jpg survives! Gordo 22:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

The other one that was here was deleted on 2008-06-06 as a "clear copyvio", so maybe time to relist this one. -- 92.40.235.152 01:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

PD-URAA

Re this edit: since when is 1928 < 1923?? Lupo 14:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Because I've read the book (and then some more about Mr. Spelterini). He showed his photos before in many presentations, using a projector. But the first publication (distribution of copies to the general public) was this 1928 bi-lingual German-French book, published in Switzerland. Lupo 16:05, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

The book, BTW, makes no mention of his photos having appeared in newspapers before that, and in all my studies about him I have not found one shred of evidence that even just hinted at an earlier publication. Lupo 16:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Another CC Template?

Hi, after a few talks on the theme on COM:VP, and after being convinced on advantages of "CC-by" towards "Attribution", I started to design a more intelligent user-editable CC-template (well, the developer+programming-work would be done by Rocket000).

I now learn that CC and Attribution ARE the same, such template therefore would not be of any use.

In case you're interested, I please invite you to talk on User talk:WeHaWoe/TestSite#Looks like bad luck for the project 8( for kind of brainstorming. Best, Wolfgang, WeHaWoe 09:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Commons Talk:Image casebook

Did you archive the stuff you deleted in this edit somewhere? Lupo 17:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Category:Milan Hodža

Hello, Milan Hodža never was the prime minister of the Slovak Republic because at that time Slovakia didn't exist as an independent country, but only as part of Czechoslovakia. Even though he was a Slovak politician. Have a nice day! --Pescan (talk) 16:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

PD-old-70

I notice that selecting "Public domain - author died more than 70 years ago" from the dropdown menu when uploading still adds {{PD-old}}, not {{PD-old-70}}. Is progress being made there? —Angr 18:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Barack Obama walks with Joe Biden at VP announcement.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Barack Obama walks with Joe Biden at VP announcement.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Hi, this image is a copyvio already on Flickr. The Uploader there, bobster1985, is not the author of the image, he just copied his Image from the NY Times homepage without permission to publish it under creative commons. -Martin H. (talk) 17:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Ping - Works of Gov't Employees as PD

I've responded to your comment at Commons_talk:Licensing#Works_of_US_Goverment_Employees_must_be_within_the_scope_of_duties.--User:Doug^{(talk • contribs)} 21:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Ike

I suggest moving Category:Hurricane Ike (2008) to "Category:Hurricane Ike". This one seems to be the notable one which will retire the name. Commons seems to have no media for any other Hurricane Ike; if we should in the future it can be disambiguated. Other thoughts? -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Notice of namespace-rename "Image" -> "File"

Dear user, the MediaWiki developers recently announced that the "Image:" namespace is going to be renamed to "File:". "Image:" will remain an alias. The canonical namespace name wgCanonicalNamespace will change from "Image" to "File".

I noticed that you use wgCanonicalNamespace in either your monobook.js page or a JavaScript file in your userspace (check this list).

Please check and replace all occurrences of

wgCanonicalNamespace == "Image"

with

wgNamespaceNumber == 6

to ensure that your scripts keep working. Thanks! --Dschwen (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

noGalleryToggle

Thanks, it looks impressive. I have problems installing it, see no effect. Can you check my User:Havang(nl)/monobook.js. Havang(nl) (talk) 10:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Nothing yet appears. I have done Ctr-F5 for Explorer.Havang(nl) (talk) 09:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Still not working. I presume, my IE version is from 2005, I never changed it. Havang(nl) (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

May-be the server problems disturbs its installation. I'll try again after those problems have been solved. Havang(nl) (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand why your program depends on the browser. Anyhow, I am grateful to you to have done the effort. Havang(nl) (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC). Thanks to you I updated internet explorer to version 7. Havang(nl) (talk) 09:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:James Cartwright reports destruction of USA 193.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:James Cartwright reports destruction of USA 193.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-- There is a second General Cartwright image also recommended for deletion. The reason is they are both duplicate images. Please take a look to see if you agree. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 14:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cartwright and England follow the progress of USA 193.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Cartwright and England follow the progress of USA 193.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 15:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

File:Eli_Manning_at_rally_after_Super_Bowl_XLII.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Eli_Manning_at_rally_after_Super_Bowl_XLII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

✰ALLSTAR✰ ^echo 07:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Reuse_Wikimedia_content.svg

File:Reuse_Wikimedia_content.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.146.187.68 14:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/FlagRevs

Hi, I just closed this DR and noticed that you substed the {{Delete}} templates on the image pages (you used {{subst:delete}} instead of {{delete}}). You should not do that, because it makes it harder to remove it after the image is kept. Thank you. –Tryphon^☂ 08:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

File:070401_Panmunjeom3.jpg

File:070401_Panmunjeom3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 02:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:USNS Catawba (T-ATF-168) delivers supplies to MV Faina.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:USNS Catawba (T-ATF-168) delivers supplies to MV Faina.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:USNS Catawba (T-ATF-168) delivers supplies to MV Faina.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 19:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Mattflaschen!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 18:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Jackson County, Alabama tornado damage.JPG was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Zune_color_negro_cropped.jpg

File:Zune_color_negro_cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 17:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

OTRS noticeboard

Hi Superm401, please see COM:ON#Check for email regarding File:TangieAmbrose with short hair.JPG. — Pajz (talk) 07:10, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

for catching this typo of mine. JesseW (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Superm401 - Talk 06:28, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Border signs

Border signs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Evrik (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Mattflaschen/common.js

Hi Mattflaschen, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Mattflaschen/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 18 character 31: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if (docTitle.indexOf("User:") == 0 || docTitle.indexOf("User talk:") == 0)
2. ISSUE: line 18 character 70: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if (docTitle.indexOf("User:") == 0 || docTitle.indexOf("User talk:") == 0)
3. ISSUE: line 50 character 42: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript("User:Superm401/catWarn.js")
4. ISSUE: line 52 character 42: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript("User:Superm401/editNew.js")
5. ISSUE: line 59 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 05:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC).

Schengen Area

Distracting!

Hello!

(copied from User talk:Rob984)

Could you please edit this map so that colour-blind readers are not confused and wonder whether Turkey and Russia are part of the Schengen Area?

As it is, I don't believe this map complies with en:WP:Accessibility#Colour because colours and contrast are so close.

Thank you for this much needed improvement. --Azurfrog (talk) 08:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Roybean2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Roybean2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Roybean2.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Mattflaschen, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Molasses

Molasses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 07:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Bottledwater.jpg

File:Bottledwater.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:11, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Serbia-CIA WFB Map 2006.png

Hi Matt. Could you please have a look at the recent changes? --Leyo 10:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Alpha-blue-trans.png

File:Alpha-blue-trans.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:PIA12190-Smoke from Station Fire Blankets Southern California.png

File:PIA12190-Smoke from Station Fire Blankets Southern California.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 13:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:IAFF

IAFF has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 05:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG

File:UnionSquareAtomicClock.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Convert_to_Ogg

Category:Convert_to_Ogg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

/Leonel Sohns _{stop bugging me!} 13:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

File:MODIS - Great Britain and Ireland - 2012-06-04 during heat wave.jpg

File:MODIS - Great Britain and Ireland - 2012-06-04 during heat wave.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 173.225.242.222.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Colin Powell anthrax vial. 5 Feb 2003 at the UN.jpg

File:Colin Powell anthrax vial. 5 Feb 2003 at the UN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Victorgrigas (talk) 16:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)