User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 14

Latest comment: 11 months ago by Mike Peel in topic RE:
Archive 10 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 19

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality with nice background. --FlocciNivis 10:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 18:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a PC --Poco a poco 22:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, PC done. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:05, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment has a very slight tilt CW. --MB-one 23:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MB-one: Thanks for the review, I've rotated it a little. Thanks. Mike Peel 10:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 13:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I'd crop the bottom to get rid of the ropes --Poco a poco 08:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, I've cropped it, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 10:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Better indeed --Poco a poco 21:58, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Definitely not a QI of the Alcazaba like this. If you change the subject to the scaffoling I'd follow --Poco a poco 08:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: OK, reworded, does that work? Thanks. Mike Peel 10:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support I think so --Poco a poco 21:58, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Categorisation added / Smart #1 - QI

Hey Mike, thanks for your comment concerning my images of the Smart #1 being nominated for QI on February 12. I just added the category. Thanks in advance for your final examination. BR M 93 (talk) 20:03, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@M 93: Thanks, they look good now, I've proposed them for promotion. You take good photographs! BTW, I know the photo at [1] has now been archived, but it's a simple fix if you want to retry - and let me know if you want any help with things like this! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 00:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 00:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 00:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Structured data is missing. --XRay 05:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Museo del Campesino 2022 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mirador de Humboldt 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mirador de Humboldt 2023 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mirador de Humboldt 2023 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 20:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mirador de Humboldt 2023 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mirador de Humboldt 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:53, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Structured data would be nice. --XRay 14:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biddulph 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 21:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 18:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biddulph 2023 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
man...this sheep net in the background...but ok, don't want to ruin the promotion here --Der Angemeldete 12:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 14:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think cropping it a bit from the left side would make it more balanced. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Fabian Roudra Baroi: Thanks for the review, cropped on the left. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good enough --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Horizon appears tilted CW --Tagooty 03:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Tagooty: Thanks for the review, rotated. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 08:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Participe do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil 2023!

 
 
Carnaval de Maragogipe, por Fernando de Freitas Barbosa

Olá! O mês de março chegou e o Wiki Loves Cultura Popular, etapa nacional do concurso Wiki Loves Folklore ainda está acontecendo! Como você já participou de outros concursos fotográficos anteriormente, lhe convidamos a enviar suas fotografias, vídeos e áudios que registrem a cultura popular brasileira. Em 2023, serão premiadas os 5 melhores arquivos de mídia enviados ao concurso, além de 10 prêmios para os participantes que mais ilustrarem tópicos de interesse da cultura popular, que podem ser acessados aqui. Participe do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular e concorra aos seguintes prêmios:

  • Melhor mídia do Pará: R$ 2.500,00
  • Melhor mídia: R$ 2.500,00
  • 2ª melhor mídia: R$ 2.000,00
  • 3ª melhor mídia: R$ 1.500,00
  • 4ª melhor mídia: R$ 1.000,00
  • 5ª melhor mídia: R$ 500,00
  • 10 maiores contribuidores de mídias: R$ 200,00

Todos os prêmios serão oferecidos sob a forma de vale-presente.

É imprescindível que o participante tenha inserido um endereço de e-mail válido para contato em sua conta Wiki.

O período de entrega do prêmio depende de alguns fatores, como avaliação do júri, contagem de contribuições e contato. Esperamos realizar a entrega até 30 de maio de 2023.

Leia mais sobre a etapa nacional do concurso na página do evento, Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil 2023.

Venha participar do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil 2023! --LBelo (WMB) (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Glossop 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Glossop 2023 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Glossop 2023 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Left side leaning out --Poco a poco 10:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: Tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 22:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oops, I misread left as right, I see what you mean now. New version uploaded that should fix it. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Glossop 2023 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:09, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:26, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:59, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Glossop 2023 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment Please, check verticals for the background objects. Perspective correction is needed. --LexKurochkin 18:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@LexKurochkin: Thanks for the review, and good spot, perspective correction fixed. Thanks. Mike Peel 11:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality --LexKurochkin 19:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment Rocks are overexposed in the foreground. --Sebring12Hrs 11:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review, I've tweaked the highlights so the rocks should look better now. Thanks. Mike Peel 11:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 19:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Draceane 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. -- 17:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 17:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sudbury Hall 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 17:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sudbury Hall 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Not as sharp as it could be, but QI given the size --Poco a poco 19:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 17:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava 2023 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is   chromatic aberration to be removed from the edges of the roof and the lamp post. --Augustgeyler 17:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Augustgeyler: Thanks for the review, but I can't spot it? Could you highlight the CA on the file page? Also please check you're looking at the new version, CA was definitely there in the previous one! Thanks. Mike Peel 11:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
OK, I might have seen the first version. CA is corrected. The only thing will be to correct the verticals: The image needs a little cw rotation and a proper perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 00:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Augustgeyler: Thanks, I've had another go at perspective and rotated it a bit, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:09, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality now. --Augustgeyler 12:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a PC --Poco a poco 18:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, perspective corrected. Thanks. Mike Peel 12:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. -- 03:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatton Park Flower Show 2014 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatton Park Flower Show 2014 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 22:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatton Park Flower Show 2014 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyme Park 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Love this one. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of the Earl of Beaconsfield, St George's Plateau, Liverpool.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 036 - Grand Princess.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony Centre, Berlin 2014-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:40, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:40, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality and composition. --Augustgeyler 09:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Modification on Wikidata Infobox about Louvre Collections ID

Hello @Mike Peel I made a request for a simple modification on Wikidata Infobox about Louvre Museum ID (replacement of the obsolote ID Atlas with the new Louvre Collection ID). It was two months but no one replied and I can not do the modification myself. As I see that you maintain a lot this template, is it possible for you to look if the modification could be done? It would be great. If you think it's a bad idea, just forget this request. Best regards Shonagon (talk) 11:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Shonagon: Sorry, I'm behind on this. I'm hoping to catch up early next month, as long as it's on the talk page it's still on the to-do list. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for you reply and the information about the process. I hope, more than the modification, that you will find balance in the sometimes very busy wikimedian activities. Take care of yourself. Best regards Shonagon (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Compared to image no. 18 it looks slightly   Underexposed --Augustgeyler 10:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Augustgeyler: Brightened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Yes ist does, good quality now. --Augustgeyler 17:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Compared to image no 18 it looks slightly   Underexposed --Augustgeyler 10:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Augustgeyler: Brightened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Yes ist does, good quality now. --Augustgeyler 17:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 13:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: Perspective corrected, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment It needs perspective correction. Else it's ok. --Imehling 08:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Imehling: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 13:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The two old men on both sides of the picture got attacked by CAs and CRs. --Der Angemeldete 12:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Der Angemeldete: Good spot, I've done my best to fix it, new version uploaded. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support I'm sorry I forgot about this one. You tried your best. Due to composition I would say quality ok with some forgivable mistakes --Der Angemeldete 10:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Teide Observatory 2022 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Teide Observatory 2022 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2020 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edmund Gardner dazzle ship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Combrian 21:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windmill of Durazno 2022 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice Mill ! --Combrian 21:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:44, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:44, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:44, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 039 - Grand Princess.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! São Paulo Zoo 2018 162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cape Point 2014 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   CommentSome strange spots in the sky, else ok --Imehling 18:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Imehling: Thanks for the review. I think they were birds, now removed, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC) Yes. --Imehling 20:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Jean Mignon

is for a French 16th-century artist NOT a 20th-century Belgian politician. Stop re-adding it. Johnbod (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Johnbod: Fixed, I think I found the right person at Jean Mignon (Q97670813), please could you double-check? & BTW, to stop Pi bot re-adding the infobox, do these edits on Wikidata, which unlinks the Commons category from Wikidata. Or if you do a revert like this, I get a notification about it and look into it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
That's the guy, thanks! Where are you these days? Best, Johnbod (talk) 20:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Johnbod: Tenerife still at the moment, but London-bound soon. Hope to see you there at wikimeets etc.! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes - I should be online on Wednesday or whenever it is, Johnbod (talk) 21:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

PR is not in the US.

Hi Mike. The location is incorrect on the infobox of Barahona. Why does it show up like that? PR is in the Caribbean. It is a territory of the US but it is not in the US. It's an insular area of the US. It's associated with the US but it is not in the US. This infobox and others in the same vein should not show location equal to USA. Cheers! The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@The Eloquent Peasant: It's because Barahona (Q2994584) had two values for located in the administrative territorial entity (P131), so the infobox was showing both of them and the country (P17) value, which is United States of America (Q30). I've removed one of the values, so now the located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) tree works correctly. BTW, it's normally best to ask questions like this at Template talk:Wikidata Infobox, then others can help too. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I was scratching my head. Thank you. I will next time. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 10:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! São Paulo Zoo 2018 156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
overexposure on head should be sorted --Charlesjsharp 09:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Charlesjsharp: Levels tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:21, 25 March 2023 yes thanks Charlesjsharp 09:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)(UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardim Botânico de São Paulo 2018 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

dark mode

can we get the dark mode here? KuldeepBurjBhalaike (Talk|Cont) 08:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Kuldeepburjbhalaike: As far as I'm aware, no. See mw:Manual:Dark mode. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 08:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 08:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 08:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you remove the noise in the sky ?--Reda Kerbouche 08:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support I dont mind the noise in the sky. --Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) 12:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Reda Kerbouche and Richard Sekerak (WMCZ): Thanks for the reviews, I've uploaded a new version with reduced noise. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sudbury Hall 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality, very lively scene --FlocciNivis 10:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatton Park 2015 54 - old lorry (17 ALL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imperial War Museum North view 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 038 - Grand Princess.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 06:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--Pi bot (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 17:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telescope sculpture, Liverpool 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a violet CA on the top of the left turret.--Reda Kerbouche 08:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
There is a violet CA also on toe top of the right turret --Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) 12:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Reda Kerbouche and Richard Sekerak (WMCZ): Good spot, tweaked & new version uploaded, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC) It is better, Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 06:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some purple CAs on the left (see the notes) that should be removed. --Halavar 18:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Halavar: Thanks for the review, I've tweaked the CA correction, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Yes, very good:) QI for me now. --Halavar 19:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 20:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, perspective corrected. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edward VII statue, Liverpool 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Very good composition. --Augustgeyler 08:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is it possible to sharpen and perhaps crop more tightly? --Scotch Mist 11:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Scotch Mist: Thanks for the review, sharpened and cropped. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 16:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telescope sculpture, Liverpool 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatton Park 2015 55 - old lorry (17 ALL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 027 - Gemini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Ok, but needs perspective correction --Imehling 16:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Imehling: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked. Thanks. Mike Peel 08:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 11:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment The picture needs perspective correction and maybe a different crop. --Imehling 16:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Imehling: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked, and that necessitated a different crop. Thanks. Mike Peel 08:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Way better now. --Imehling 11:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Babybel mini roll 1.jpg

 
File:Babybel mini roll 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Verbcatcher (talk) 00:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Dongfeng_Yufeng

 

Dongfeng Yufeng has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ominae (talk) 11:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antoni van Leeuwenhoek letters to the Royal Society 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Society - John Frederick William Herschel correspondence 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 17:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Society - John Frederick William Herschel correspondence 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 17:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Society - John Frederick William Herschel correspondence 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 17:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Society - John Frederick William Herschel correspondence 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Humboldt-Universität Berlin 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Book burning memorial on Bebelplatz, Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:17, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Sinta and Roma memorial 2014-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyme Park 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Chainwit. 01:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:59, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyme Park 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment There's a black spot in the clouds. --Imehling 06:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Imehling: Thanks for the review, I think it was a bird, now removed. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyme Park 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyme Park 2014 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --BigDom 18:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lef side leaning out --Poco a poco 08:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: New version uploaded, is that better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Indeed --Poco a poco 20:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Question Buildings in background are unnaturally tilted. Can you correct it, please? --LexKurochkin 08:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@LexKurochkin: I've uploaded a new version that improves, but doesn't completely fix this. Making them completely vertical breaks the composition - either the nose is cut off, or most of the bottom has to go, or I just crop the buildings and the composition is unbalanced. Thanks. Mike Peel 12:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Well...   Weak support Good enough, IMO --LexKurochkin 13:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Weak support Slight DoF problem but not critical IMO --LexKurochkin 08:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality --LexKurochkin 08:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Please provide the Summary/Description. --Tagooty 00:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Buildings on the right side are leaning. Perspective correction needed.. --Halavar 16:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Halavar: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 22:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Yes, much better. Good quality now. --Halavar 13:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

QI candidate At_the_Intrepid_Museum_2023_149

The tweaked image is a little better, but could be further improved. I downloaded your original image, used a graduated filter to reduce the exposure in the top left. Then used a clone tool with opaqueness 72% to eliminate the blown section. I applied the clone tool 5 times in adjacent sub-sections to get a smoother effect. Click here for my attempt at improving the image.
If you like it, feel free to upload this version. Or, you may rework it yourself. I used Lightroom, GIMP or Photoshop should support similar editing. --Tagooty (talk) 03:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Tagooty: Thanks for the hints! I like the graduated filter approach, I didn't know that was possible in Lightroom. I've uploaded a new version using that, how does it look? I'm less keen on using the clone tool here, since the reworked region seems a bit too obvious in your version, and it makes the image a bit less authentic in my mind. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Much better! Tagooty (talk) 03:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fix?

Hello Mike. At Special:WantedPages, there's a ton of wanted pages (Category:Men of the country by name or Category:Women of the country by name) that are empty, and the problem seems to be coming from {{Wikidata Infobox}}. These categories should not exist as we don't address the country by the country, with the exception of UK, US, UAE (just to name a few). Do kindly assist to fix it. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Minorax: The best place to raise these issues is Template talk:Wikidata Infobox, where others can also help look into them (feel free to repost this there). But from a quick look, I think this is the usual problem of phab:T14019, see meta:Community Wishlist Survey 2022/Miscellaneous/Check if a page exists without populating WhatLinksHere - which would need to be resolved in MediaWiki itself. The problem being, some of the categories are, e.g., 'Women of the United Kingdom by name' - so the check is unavoidable in this case. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wikidata_infobox_maintenance

 

Wikidata infobox maintenance has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


89.196.34.140 05:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:31, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The blown highlight on the top left corner is distracting. Fixable? --Tagooty 03:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Tagooty: I've tweaked it, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:45, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality now, thank you --Tagooty 03:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Buildings on the left are not vertical. --Mike1979 Russia 07:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Mike1979 Russia: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Yes, It's much better. --Mike1979 Russia 15:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Delete dust spot, please. --Mike1979 Russia 15:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Mike1979 Russia: Dust spot deleted, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support OK, good. --Mike1979 Russia 18:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too soft IMO. Adding more sharpness would help. --Halavar 07:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Halavar: Thanks for the review, I've sharpened it further, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Looks better, QI for me. --Halavar 15:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is acceptable to me, but please eliminate CA toward the upper left. Also, this is a concert band, not a brass band. See all those woodwind instruments? Please edit file description. Ikan Kekek 19:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the review! CA and description tweaked, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 22:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Comment The corrections are good, but I'm now noticing what looks like a cord furthest to the left that's partly blown, so that there are bits of it that look like they're suspended in mid-air. Is there any way to recover the rest of the cord, so that it's somewhat visible? -- Ikan Kekek 22:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Ikan Kekek: Not easily, I think the cord is lost. The simplest thing is to crop that out, does it look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support I think this is a big improvement to the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 06:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Edward's Church, Leek 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted/lacking a perspective correction --Poco a poco 09:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Poco a poco: Rotated, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Society - John Frederick William Herschel correspondence 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MVmath20 07:21, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Society - John Frederick William Herschel correspondence 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MVmath20 07:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

RE:

hi Mr. Mike Peel, I saw your thank you and I am pleased with it, on the other hand alas there are scattered throughout the commons many files of excellent quality but without category, which is the cause of cloned uploads alas :) I would like to ask you if you are a ' administrator?? Nesinatra (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Nesinatra: Yup, there's plenty to do, keep up the good work with categorising. :-) I am a janitor/admin here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
are you able to restore deleted files?? Nesinatra (talk) 16:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Nesinatra: I can, but it's best if you ask at Commons:Undeletion requests. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I would absolutely avoid using it because it takes obscenely long to submit a request and then see the result, and then I would have files that would not accept me, and I would need immediate recovery. these are PD licensed files (portrait & paintings & vintage photographs). by chance if you had the emails, I could send you some of those files to show you, I would avoid doing it here so as not to fill your talk unnecessarily. I also say it out of a sense of education :) --Nesinatra (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Nesinatra: I'd still encourage you to submit the request, and ping me if it does take a while and I can have a look at it there. You can also email me via Special:EmailUser/Mike_Peel if you want. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
thank you very much. I will not fail to let you hear from me as soon as possible, thank you very much--Nesinatra (talk) 18:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Comment, @Mike Peel: In fact this user appears to be another sockpuppet of LTA abuser A3cb1, who has dedicated himself to mass uploading images of paintings and photographs of members of the nobility and European royal houses with little information about the authors and dates of completion, and all this for many years. Although some of those files are old enough to fall under PD, a considerable part of them were not yet –rather, they were copyvios– and, despite warnings, numerous DRs and checkuser requests, this LTA continues with the same actions. Their last socks appear to share with this user the same modus operandi: first they add and/or change categories of existing files, later, upload some files of different scope to nobility –although this user has not yet uploaded files–, and then they ask individual administrators for undeletion of their other socks' files. See Requests for checkuser/Case/A3cb1 for more information. 81.41.175.237 18:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
... and this is why I point to standard processes. Thanks for the info. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Nesinatra: I've had a look at the example you emailed, that case would need to go through Commons:Undeletion requests. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Return to the user page of "Mike Peel/Archive 14".