User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 16

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

File:The Case for Space Environmentalism Fig 1.png

File:The Case for Space Environmentalism Fig 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prototyperspective (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Info reverted to "Nomination". User:Laquearius is not allowed to vote (insufficient edits, registered yesterday). Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Luda.slominska 17:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Красный 19:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Sand sculpture at Carnac.jpg

File:Sand sculpture at Carnac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bibury 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough --Grunpfnul 16:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Convite para participar do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2023

Olá, @Mike Peel! O Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2023 começou dia 1º de setembro!

Em uma semana, já conseguimos mais de 3600 fotografias de mais de 13 estados brasileiros. Este ano, teremos três categorias de premiação: Melhores Imagens, Maiores Contribuidores e Melhor Imagem do Pará.

Gostaria de te convidar a participar do concurso este ano novamente! Por favor, confira as listas de monumentos ou o aplicativo de mapa para enviar suas fotografias do patrimônio histórico brasileiro!

Abraços, EPorto (WMB) (talk) 22:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 20:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 20:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:07, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 36.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 36.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bibury 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hemmers 09:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Demolition of the Manchester Precinct Centre 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:10, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Demolition of the Manchester Precinct Centre 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lincoln's Inn 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lincoln's Inn 2023 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lincoln's Inn 2023 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lincoln's Inn 2023 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lincoln's Inn 2023 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Visible violett chromatic aberration should be removed. --F. Riedelio 09:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC) @F. Riedelio: Thanks for the review, I've tweaked the CA, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Albert Einstein Memorial, Washington DC 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Albert Einstein Memorial, Washington DC.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Harsh light, but quality is ok for me --Nino Verde 08:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

false positive QI promotion

Please see [1]. Neither is this my image nor did I ever touch it. Two things: find the root cause and attribute it to the proper user. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki: It looks like @Neoclassicism Enthusiast: attributed it to you in their nomination of it, see the nomination in the archive at Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_September_16_2023. Bot working OK, but human error? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

thanks for identifying the root cause. the bot was the bearer of the good message. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments green chromatic aberration a bit dark --Ezarate73 17:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC) @Ezarate73: Thanks for the review, brightness tweaked, green CA hopefully removed, please let me know where if I've missed any. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Pi bot

Hi Mike, WLM is still runnig but can pi bot run across Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Germany and add the wikidatainfobox if necessary. Thanks and greetings from Germany Z ^thomas 05:15, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

@Z thomas: Pi bot should be adding all needed infoboxes on a daily basis (using a database query), are there some it is missing? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Perfect. Thanks. I remembered some problems some years ago. But you fixed it :-)

I'll check tomorrow, if some new connected cats are missing. Greetings Z ^thomas 06:16, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Table Mountain from Signal Hill 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 21:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Table Mountain from Signal Hill 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 21:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hout Bay 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Demolition of the Manchester Precinct Centre 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:36, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I suggest cropping the shoe to the right. --C messier 18:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for looking, cropped. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC) Support --C messier 18:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:IPad Air 2013 005.jpg

Yours sincerely, Larryasou (talk) 14:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robin Hood statue, Nottingham Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lincoln's Inn 2023 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museu Paulista Backstage Pass 2018 171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Ana, Garachico 2019 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museu do Ipiranga 2018 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizontals are not straight, probably verticals too. --Nino Verde 08:57, 19 September 2023 (UTC) @Nino Verde: Thanks for the review, perspective redone, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peveril Castle 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peveril Castle 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Marlborough 2023 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will happily promote this excellent shot once the CA in the upper part are fixed --Virtual-Pano 07:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC) @Virtual-Pano: Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality, now --Virtual-Pano 07:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karoo National Park 2014 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Massive blur on the right side - Lens dejustage? A crop would improve the picture --Grunpfnul 19:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC) @Grunpfnul: Thanks for the review, I think it was focus. Cropped, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croft Castle 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs disturbing (mostly top-left) --Terragio67 04:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC) @Terragio67: Thanks for looking, CAs tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 05:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croft Castle 2015 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs --Terragio67 04:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC) CAs on the top --Terragio67 04:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC) @Terragio67: Thanks for looking, CAs tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 05:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 08:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Table Mountain from Signal Hill 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Eastcote tube station 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teide Observatory 2018 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2020 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Gran Canaria 2021 1143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Gigantes 2022 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wikimania (MP) 2023 312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong noise and hot pixel visible (the red dots) - fixable? --Grunpfnul 09:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC) @Grunpfnul: Thanks for the review, noise reduced, hot pixel fixed. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 09:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bath 2014 02 - Pulteney Bridge and Bath Weir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK quality --Charlesjsharp 09:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bath 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue on Royal Avenue, Bath 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Slight blur but OK for 18 MP IMO. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 08:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trentham Gardens 2015 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2018 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Radiobservatório do Itapetinga 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the port of Las Palmas 2022 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Table Mountain from Signal Hill 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

About Category:Industry

Yesterday the bot put a wrong Wikidata here. So I removed the Wikidata item and changed it, but forgot to put the correct one here. So thank you for your edits! JopkeB (talk) 03:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Andrew M. Boss

Category:Andrew M. Boss is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ ^{🩺 • 💉} 05:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asian Elephant at Chester Zoo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 20:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

File name format?

Heya, I am going through your photos that you had taken in Singapore among many other photos. Do you have any preferred naming format for me to take into account as I begin to move your files, i.e. File:At Singapore 2023 029.jpg to more descriptive ones under FR2 criterion. Robertsky (talk) 16:44, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

@Robertsky: Thanks, happy for them to be renamed. I plan to go through them myself at some point to categorise them better, but not quite sure when yet. If possible, could you keep the existing names and add text after the number before .jpg? That would make it easier for me to keep track of them (I store the filenames as titles in Lightroom so I can cross-check against my watchlist and keep track of the files). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Great. I will do so regarding the file name formatting. Probably it will help you as well in keeping your categories organised as they are right now. Robertsky (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buckler's Hard 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 13:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapman's Peak, South Africa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Slightly tilted CCW (check horizon). Otherwise good. --MB-one 10:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC) @MB-one: Thanks for the review, new rotated version uploaded. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:13, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Gigantes 2022 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals are not straight, can you fix it? --Nino Verde 13:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC) @Nino Verde: Thanks for the review, verticals tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Definitely yes ) --Nino Verde 09:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:14, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York Minster 2015 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buckler's Hard 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 20:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted clockwise and the unidentified ship category should be removed, IMHO there is no reason to identify small private yachts/boats. --C messier 18:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for the review, rotated, category removed, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC) There is still some CW tilt. --C messier 17:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC) OK, I'm on a laptop at the moment, will come back to this at the weekend when I can use a proper screen to tweak it more. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC) @C messier: Back on a big screen and I think I see what you mean, have had another go, how is that? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Support Good quality. --C messier 20:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountains Abbey 2016 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective control --FlocciNivis 20:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC) @FlocciNivis: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked more, but I think the building isn't quite straight... Thanks. Mike Peel 19:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --FlocciNivis 17:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please crop the lamp post at the left border? --Poco a poco 16:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, image cropped. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilson House, London 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 06:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please add geo location (also to the photo before)--Michielverbeek 05:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC) @Michielverbeek: Thanks for looking, object location added to both this and the previous photo. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but too much space in the top --Michielverbeek 08:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC) @Michielverbeek: Thanks for the review, cropped. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC) QI now --Michielverbeek 17:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice shot an good quality. Did you actually climb the median barrier? --MB-one 18:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 028.jpg

And also:

• File:At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 030.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 018.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 137.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 484.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 485.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 492.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 494.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 495.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 496.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 497.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 498.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2019 517.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2020 063.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2020 823.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2020 868.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2020 873.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2020 875.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2020 877.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2020 882.jpg
• File:At Tenerife 2020 883.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 044.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 045.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 058.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 060.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 090.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 091.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 095.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 096.jpg
• File:Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 099.jpg
• File:Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 048.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 090.jpg

And also:

• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 091.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 092.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 093.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 094.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 095.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 096.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 097.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 098.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 099.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 100.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 101.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 102.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 103.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 104.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 105.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 106.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 107.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 108.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 109.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 110.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 111.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 112.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 113.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 114.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 115.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 116.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 117.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 118.jpg
• File:At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 119.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:At Tenerife 2020 888.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This needs PC --FlocciNivis 08:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC) @FlocciNivis: Thanks for looking, PC tweaked (and I've learnt new things about how Lightroom does PC while doing so - thanks for pushing this!), does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Yep, that is QI now! I'm glad that you could learn something :) --FlocciNivis 10:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 160 - Grand Park City Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Fine for me. Some might object due perspective, but there's even a QI category "Perspective" for this kind of pictures. --Plozessor 18:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Collections_of_the_Museum_of_Transport,_Greater_Manchester

Collections of the Museum of Transport, Greater Manchester has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Hullian111 (talk) 15:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Intresting view, but tilted and perspective distortion. Maybe hard to correct, due to tight crop --ArildV 07:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC) @ArildV: Thanks for looking, revised version uploaded that should help with the perspective, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Almost perfect now. Thank you --ArildV 18:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also tilted. --ArildV 07:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC) @ArildV: Also tweaked. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Those leaves near a head are a little bit distracting IMO, but OK for QI --Jakubhal 14:19, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 20:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not too sharp and some CA, especially in the upper areas (mostly visible at the roof). --Plozessor 19:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for the review, sharpened, CA fixed. Thanks. Mike Peel 12:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Now it's really good! --Plozessor 12:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

File:High Line, New York 2012 25.jpg

File:High Line, New York 2012 25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please rename those "At Solisbury" files to something more specific. --Plozessor 17:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2019 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- ~~~~  Support Good quality --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good image of an interesting building -- Spurzem 20:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 075.jpg

And also:

• File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 077.jpg
• File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 078.jpg
• File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 079.jpg
• File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 080.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt Airport Skyline 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt Airport Skyline 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 083 - Elephant statue at the Old Parliament House, Singapore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If you fix the verticals and give the file a proper name ... --Plozessor 07:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, file renamed. The perspective is deliberately looking upwards, 'fixing' the verticals would distort the perspective too much. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality! Personally I have no issue with the verticals. --Plozessor 04:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 059 - Bust of Blas Cabrera Felipe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture, poor filename. --Plozessor 07:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 241 - Simon Bolivar monument in Garachico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture, poor filename. --Plozessor 07:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This appears to be slightly tilted. Could this be fixed? --AFBorchert 07:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC) @AFBorchert: Thanks for looking, I've re-tweaked perspective and rotated a bit, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support This is indeed better in my opinion. Thanks. QI to me. --AFBorchert 23:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok imo. --ArildV 13:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tree and the bright sky are not very interesting, maybe a tighter crop? --ArildV 09:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC) @ArildV: Thanks for looking, cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Thank you, good quality. --ArildV 21:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This would need some perspective correction. --Plozessor 17:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, the angle of the photo is such that applying perspective correction wouldn't work (it's close and looking up). Thanks. Mike Peel 19:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support For me this is ok, it could fit in QI's "perspective" category then. --Plozessor 04:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not too sharp and still a bit noisy in the dark parts. --Plozessor 18:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, sharpened and noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support I'd say sharpness is borderline now, but it's acceptable. You could still rename it something more specific. --Plozessor 04:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not too sharp and still a bit noisy in the dark parts. --Plozessor 18:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, sharpened and noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support I'd say sharpness is borderline now, but it's acceptable. You could still rename it something more specific. --Plozessor 04:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 058 - lightbulb sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sharp, overexposed front, meaningless name ("At Singapore") --Plozessor 17:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Sharpened, levels tweaked, renamed, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but what is an LTA-1? --Imehling 10:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the review. It's an Apollo Lunar Module test article, clarified in the caption. Thanks. Mike Peel 15:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smithfield Market 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, please rename to something meaningful. --Plozessor 05:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Prominent purple fringes in the branches at the top. Fixable. --C messier 19:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, new version uploaded. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:40, 29 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunel University 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 057 - Bust of Blas Cabrera Felipe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Appears tilted ccw. Needs a descriptive filename. --Tagooty 04:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC) @Tagooty: Thanks for the review. File renamed. The statue itself is tilted, see where it meets the ground and the background. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks --Tagooty 09:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 1118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 1119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 1121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 908 - Monument to Francisco Ramos Vargas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture but please rename it to something meaningful. --Plozessor 14:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for the review, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 055 - Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowshill Manor 2015 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowshill Manor 2015 093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 20:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowshill Manor 2015 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowshill Manor 2015 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just sharp enough. --Plozessor 19:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Cabinet Office logo.svg

File:Cabinet Office logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xeroctic (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Garachico, Tenerife 2019 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowshill Manor 2015 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just sharp enough. --Plozessor 19:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salisbury 2023 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Subject in focus. --Sebring12Hrs 11:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 058 - Bust of Blas Cabrera Felipe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If you tilt it so that the base is horizontal and rename it, I'd clearly promote that, it's perfectly sharp and all. --Plozessor 17:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for the review. File renamed. The statue itself is tilted, see the other photos of it, I corrected the angles here based on the background. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good now! --Plozessor 12:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

What is this nonsense?

A church picture in a map category like this? greetings Rauenstein (talk) 23:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Rauenstein: Yup, that's working as intended. The category is a combination of 'maps' and 'Champey' - so the Infobox describes this at the top, and then shows the same content as at Category:Champey so you can understand what Champey is. It just so happens that the image (P18) value of Champey (Q835481) is a church. Note that you have the image switcher to see the other related images that are linked to from the Wikidata item. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:11, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Completely illogical, sorry. Anyone who came to this category wants to see the maps. He already knows the community category because that's the main category. I also know that I can switch, but I don't understand the point of this unnecessary gimmick. Another example of what the introduction of wikidata leaves behind for nonsensical bot actions. Rauenstein (talk) 23:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

What might seem illogical to you, helps others. For example, finding this category through google search, and not seeing the main category - or not knowing English, and wanting to see the category context in their language. The infobox is down to one side, so it doesn't distract from the content - but having more than one map would help. BTW, is this the same category as Category:Maps of Champey (Haute-Saône)? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 15:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jay.Jarosz 19:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jay.Jarosz 19:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Fuerte de Adeje 2020 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Mayor 2015 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please identify, if possible, the artist. --AFBorchert 05:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the review, artist information added. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Stockholm 2019 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Mayor 2015 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good picture, maybe give it a more specific filename. --Plozessor 05:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Mayor 2015 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Mayor 2015 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe use a more specific filename. Also, I think the building on the left does not disqualify the picture because it is not the subject, but if could brighten that a bit it might look more natural. --Plozessor 05:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Mayor 2015 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacock 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalyst - gate valve 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's leaning on at right a bit. --Sebring12Hrs 12:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 11:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Not sharp at full resolution but good at 5 MP. --Plozessor 05:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hi, I love your work, I used some of your photo in my new Wikipedia page (in Italian) about Pico Viejo!

9002Jack (talk) 22:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacock 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but there is some cw tilt --Poco a poco 10:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the review, rotated, does that look better? --Mike Peel 01:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Indeed --Poco a poco 08:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Garachico, Tenerife 2019 050 - Plaza de la Libertad plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture but fix the filename (to something like the description already is). --Plozessor 15:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the review, filename changed. --Mike Peel 01:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Stockholm 2019 032 - Gustaf Sandberg bust by Eric Rafael-Rådberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sharp in full resolution, but ok at 3 MP. However, please fix the file name. This is a bust of Gustaf Sandberg, not just "at Stockholm". --Plozessor 15:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the review, filename changed. --Mike Peel 01:41, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A perspective correction would be good, to remove the appearance of a toppling tower. Otherwise good --MB-one 14:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked, does that look better? --Mike Peel 01:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

QICBot bug when filename has apostrophe in it

Hi! The latest QICBot post on my usertalk page is not properly showing the file thumbnail or file name:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jay.Jarosz#Quality_Image_Promotion_6

I think it might have to do with the apostrophe in the filename?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Swiss_Farmer%27s_View.jpg

--Jay.Jarosz (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

@Jay.Jarosz: Yes, it looks like it's not displaying on your talk page because the apostrophe is appearing as %27. However, that seems to be how you nominated the file? The bot hasn't changed the filename at all in the process, from what I can see. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tyntesfield 2015 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tyntesfield 2015 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 14:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dyrham Park 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 12:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 10:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tyntesfield 2015 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The house leaning to the right. --Mike1979 Russia 09:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC) @Mike1979 Russia: Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 13:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Much better but now it's leanig away from us a bit. --Mike1979 Russia 15:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC) @Mike1979 Russia: I've tweaked the perspective some more, better? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Ideal, I think. --Mike1979 Russia 13:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chester Zoo 2016 038 - Oakfield Manor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted (left learning inward). Personally I'd also compress is vertically a bit to reduce the distortion of the roof, but that is a matter of taste (will not deny promotion due that). --Plozessor 05:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, tweaked, including aspect correction, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 13:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)  Support I'd still shrink the right side a bit, but it's ok. --Plozessor 18:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eleftherios Venizelos bust, Athens International Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, and would need a better filename. --Plozessor 05:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, noise reduced, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 14:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs geocoding/a more precise identification of the building. --C messier 19:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for looking, identification and object location added. Thanks. Mike Peel 21:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 21:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ibirapuera Park, São Paulo 2018 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardim Botânico de São Paulo 2019 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 14:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardim Botânico de São Paulo 2019 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 14:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardim Botânico de São Paulo 2019 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 14:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dyrham Park 2018 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)