Nevertime

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nevertime!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Your Flickr uploads

Hello Nevertime!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:

• Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
• You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!
  

Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Could you please see my question at File talk:Piazza Vecchia.jpg about one of your Flickr uploads? - Jmabel ! talk 02:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Nevertime!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Prosciutto di Norcia.jpg was uncategorized on 27 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Nocellara del Belice from Sicily.jpg was uncategorized on 14 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Pomodorini vesuviani.jpg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

---

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Villa Jovis.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Here is the file from flickr: File:Villa Jovis 2.jpg -- Common Good (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Your Flickr uploads

Hello Nevertime!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! One hint ahead: Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr. Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 21:15, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 97edc9f1c29402e7ba513a5605a5fabf

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Vermouth-_Martini_&_Rossi.jpg

File:Vermouth-_Martini_&_Rossi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Present from Caffè Cova.jpg

File:Present from Caffè Cova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Cantiere navale - Genova.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cantiere navale - Genova.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Cantiere navale - Genova.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Truu (talk) 20:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cantiere navale - Genova.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cantiere navale - Genova.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cantiere navale - Genova.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Captain-tucker (talk) 16:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Riso_amaro.jpg

File:Riso_amaro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 04:32, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Triennale Milano - Dolore (in ricordo di Edoardo Sanguineti).jpg

File:Triennale Milano - Dolore (in ricordo di Edoardo Sanguineti).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Fæ (talk) 05:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Limone di Sorrento (pagliarelle).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Limone di Sorrento (pagliarelle).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

 Daniel  Message  15:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Cortona - San Michele Arcangelo a Metelliano.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cortona - San Michele Arcangelo a Metelliano.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 15:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Cortona - San Michele Arcangelo a Metelliano.jpg

File:Cortona - San Michele Arcangelo a Metelliano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 15:21, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Ingrid Bergman in Stromboli.jpg

File:Ingrid Bergman in Stromboli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

VernoWhitney (talk) 01:13, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Palazzo dell'Arte - Triennale di Milano.jpg

File:Palazzo dell'Arte - Triennale di Milano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Camparitivo in Triennale (serata).jpg

And also:

• File:Camparitivo in Triennale.jpg
• File:Triennale di Milano – “Milan Design Week”, Neoreal Canon.jpg

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Triennale di Milano

Ciao, la chair con il FOP non c'entra assolutamente niente, anche perché quella foto è stata scattata all'interno di un edificio e dunque il panorama non c'entra niente. Raoli ha messo in cancellazione quell'immagine come violazione di FOP perché stiamo eliminando sistematicamente ogni immagine che violi il FOP e per farlo andiamo a cercare tutte le immagini in copyviol nelle categorie degli autori morti da meno di 70 anni. Quell'immagine è in copiviol (o almeno io e Raoli riteniamo che lo sia) perché quella sedia è un oggetto "d'arte" creato da un "artista" non morto da più di 70 anni (è ancora vivo), e la foto è un'opera derivata dal lavoro del signor Mario Botta. Ci sono però delle speranze che la tua immagine venga tenuta, ti invito a visitare questa richiesta di cancellazione e a leggere le motivazioni di chi ritiene che il file vada tenuto.--dega180 (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Grazie Dega. Vediamo che se te a differenza riesci a capirmi. Nel mondo moderno chi controlla il potere, i mezzi, il governo, chi gestisce capitali, personale, opinioni è concentrato nelle mani di pochi e non di molti. Questa piccola oligarchia, come comunque da secoli fa, cerca di non perdere il proprio potere e i propri diritti. Per questo sono nati nel corso del tempo organi di controllo in ogni campo. Molto spesso quindi si assiste al diritto dei pochi di prevalere su quello dei tanti. Ciò, storicamente parlando, accade da sempre, perlomeno da quando l'uomo si è riunito in comunità, quindi potrei azzardare che è proprio della natura umana. La questione della mancanza di FOP o LdP può essere quindi ricondotta facilmente al caso generale in cui i diritti dei pochi prevalgono su quello dei tanti, ciò non è per forza sbagliato, anzi molto spesso è un fatto positivo per molti motivi. Una immagine quindi sarà sempre soggetta ad un determinato diritto. La legge o meglio il corpo di leggi in materia di protezione dei diritti relativi alle immagini è il diritto di autore (legge n. 633 del 22 aprile 1941 aggiornata nel 2004). Essa protegge in linea generale tutte le immagini scattate, cioè regola il loro utilizzo/riutilizzo. Ogni paese naturalmente ha una sua legge sui diritti di autore. Nel mondo anglosassone si chiama copyright (diritto di copia), da noi diritto di autore. Apparte per il nome esistono notevoli differenze tra il diritto italiano e quello britannico o statunitense. Per questo si è deciso di adottare un diritto internazionale in modo da uniformare le varie legislazioni per evitare confusione nei casi in cui il diritto di un paese va in conflitto con un altro. In poche parole: il diritto internazionale stabilisce i principi di "lex loci originis" e "lex loci protectionis" in modo che si rimanda al diritto del paese di origine e al diritto del paese di protezione. Ciò fa si che se una immagine è stata scattata in Italia essa è soggetta esclusivamente al diritto italiano. Dunque, il diritto di autore protegge tutte le opere d'ingegno. Esistono però e per nostra fortuna dell limitazioni a questo diritto: in Italia esiste il c.d. {{PD-Italy}}, ma non la Libertà di Panorama. Anche la libertà di Panorama è una eccezione al diritto di autore. Esiste in tutti i paesi di questa pagina che sono OK: FOP. Come vedi in Italia non esiste quindi ogni opera ricade nel diritto di autore e viene da essa protetta. Questo è il motivo per cui le immagini sopra sono state messe in cancellazione. Anche se la parola non lo dice chiaramente la Libertà di Panorama non si applica solo ad edifici ma anche ad opere d'arte. Infatti per alcuni paesi dell'Europa questa Libertà di Panorama è configurata in maniera differente: in alcuni è completa, cioè pone nel pubblico dominio riproduzioni sia opere d'architettura che d'arte, in altri invece solo quelle d'architettura (gli edifici), in altri paesi invece pone riproduzioni d'opere d'architettura e d'arte in pubblico dominio a patto che siano utilizzate per fini non commerciali, in altri ancora non tutti gli edifici rientrano nella categoria delle opere d'architettura. Come vedi la situazione è molto variegata. In Italia comunque il concetto di Libertà di Panorama non esiste quindi non è permesso pubblicare immagini di opere d'arte o d'architettura liberamente senza cioè permesso/autorizzazione dell'autore della stessa. La sedia in questione rientra nella categoria delle opere d'arte poiché non è un prodotto industriale o con quella funzione, ma è un oggetto con funzione di opera d'arte. A questo punto entra in gioco il concetto di opera d'arte. Infatti potresti arguire che una sedia non è un'opera d'arte. Per esempio chi ti dice che la sedia sulla quale sei seduto non sia anch'essa opera d'arte? Nella maggior parte dei casi, come quello della tua sedia, il diritto di autore virtualmente esiste ma è decaduto il quanto secondo la legge esso decade quanto l'opera d'ingegno viene prodotta su scala industriale. Questo è il caso della automobili o dell'elaboratore che stai attualmente utilizzato, sia esso il più raro, figo, originale smartphone, cellulare, tablet, portatile, fisso o altro oggetto prodotto su scala industriale. Importa anche capire che se tu possiedi un oggetto fatto da uno scultore e tu lo utilizzi come portacenere esso non perde la sua natura di opera d'arte poiché tu lo stai utilizzando con una funzione utilitaria. Stesso vale per un'installazione di copertoni. Un'installazione, lo dico subito, è un'opera d'arte poiché anche l'accostamento di elementi che si giudicano comuni risulta un'opera d'arte. Per esempio se si accatastano in ordine sparso dei copertoni di un'automobile anche quella è un'opera d'arte ed è protetta al momento in cui viene esposta e fotografata il valore di opera d'arte. nell'arte moderna si assiste all'utilizzo di oggetti di uso quotidiano per fine artistici. Questo crea casino per utenti come Pava o altri che insistono sul loro punto di vista, giudicando gli altri come privi di fonte. In poche parole: l'oggetto quotidiano diventa l'opera d'arte. Molte opere di Piero Manzoni sono basate su oggetti a cui non gli si attribuisce valore artistico, ma sono comunque opere d'arte. Lo stesso vale per l'interno degli stadi, che si sa sono fatti allo stesso modo più o meno, quindi potrebbero sorgere inutili dubbi sulla mancanza di originalità. Altro esempio di oggetti quotidiani, a cui non si attribuirebbe originalità, ma che invece la possiedono, sono Una e tre sedie di Joseph Kosuth, la Body art, Diane di John De Andrea, L'uomo sulla motofalciatrice di Duane Hanson, il Graffitismo (che non ho preso di mira per la cancellazione FOP per la mia pura sensibilità, ma che rappresenta comunque un'opera d'arte) o anche Fontana di Marcel Duchamp. Sarebbe ignobile definire la Fontana di Duchamp come un semplice gabinetto o meglio orinatoio. è d'obbligo quindi badare prima alla funzione dell'opera e poi all'eventuale originalità che è un concetto piuttosto variabile nel tempo su cui non fare troppo affidamento. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Ciao Raoli, ma questa sedie è prodotta su scale industriale dall'Alias come la Spaghetti chair prodotta anche industrialmente dall'Alias. Sono vendute in serie da per tutto nel mondo!--Nevertime (talk) 16:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:La via dei pastori - particolare di un banco- Napoli.jpg

And also:

• File:Pastori in legno.jpg
• File:Presepe della Reggia di Caserta.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Coloured fountain knot - Milan.jpg

File:Coloured fountain knot - Milan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

dega180 (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Formaggio di Fossa di Sogliano.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Formaggio di Fossa di Sogliano.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Formaggio di Fossa di Sogliano.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Formaggio di Fossa di Sogliano (alter).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Formaggio di Fossa di Sogliano (alter).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Formaggio di Fossa di Sogliano (alter).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Il podere.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Il podere.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:La Dolce Vita di Federico Fellini.jpg

File:La Dolce Vita di Federico Fellini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Comment

When you upload an image from flickr, just type {{Flickrreview}} in the image file...so that the flickrbot can mark it. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Ercole Farnese (puzzle 3D).jpg

File:Ercole Farnese (puzzle 3D).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lymantria (talk) 09:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

In fact the flickr member/photographer violates copyrights here, as he takes a photograph of a copyrighted design object (a derivative work). Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Cinema Ritrovato - 2009.jpg

File:Cinema Ritrovato - 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Vulcano Buono - Inside.jpg

File:Vulcano Buono - Inside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Cinema italiano in bianco-nero.jpg

File:Cinema italiano in bianco-nero.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Design alla Triennale.jpg

File:Design alla Triennale.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Comment

When you upload an image from flickr, just type {{Flickrreview}} in the image file...so that the flickrbot can mark it. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Fellini casting.jpg

File:Fellini casting.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Leoboudv (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:MoMA – Eclisse lamp.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MoMA – Eclisse lamp.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:MoMA – Eclisse lamp.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 03:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Salone del gusto - Terra madre.jpg

File:Salone del gusto - Terra madre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 18:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Bufal'art.jpg

File:Bufal'art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Giornate del Cinema Muto (logo).jpg

File:Giornate del Cinema Muto (logo).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--레비Revi 04:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Museo del Novecento (staircase).jpg

File:Museo del Novecento (staircase).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 08:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Cappero (capparis spinosa).jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Cappero (capparis spinosa).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 16:50, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Future Film Festival - Bologna.jpg

File:Future Film Festival - Bologna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 22:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Museo archeologico di Taranto (Gold earring).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Museo archeologico di Taranto (Gold earring).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Museo archeologico di Taranto (Gold earring).jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--레비Revi 09:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Homage to Giorgio Morandi.jpg

File:Homage to Giorgio Morandi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 23:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Museo del Novecento - Milano.jpg

File:Museo del Novecento - Milano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 23:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Museo Nazionale del Cinema - Torino.jpg

File:Museo Nazionale del Cinema - Torino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Underlying lk (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Centro Direzionale - Napoli.jpg

And also:

• File:Teatro Verdi (Brindisi).jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Opening soon 2009.jpg

And also:

• File:Triennale di Milano (inside).jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Lavazza paradiso.jpg

And also:

• File:Salone del mobile 4.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 03:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Reggio calabria lungomare lampione etna.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 03:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Prosciutto di Norcia, I.G.P. Ham of Norcia.jpg

File:Prosciutto di Norcia, I.G.P. Ham of Norcia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 20:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Museo nazionale del Cinema - atrium (Turin).jpg

File:Museo nazionale del Cinema - atrium (Turin).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 06:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Museo nazionale del Cinema - Mickey (Turin).jpg

File:Museo nazionale del Cinema - Mickey (Turin).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

FredWalsh (talk) 06:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Chocolate museum of Antica Norba.jpg

Thank you very much for your kind help, really appreciated. Moyanbrenn (talk) 18:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Chocolate museum of Antica Norba.jpg

Thanks again for your support of yesterday Moyanbrenn (talk) 09:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Napoli sotterranea (mappa).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Napoli sotterranea (mappa).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Napoli sotterranea (mappa).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ruthven (msg) 11:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Hortus_Romanus

Category:Hortus_Romanus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Stefdn (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Temporary Museum for new Design -- Milano design week 2012.jpg

File:Temporary Museum for new Design -- Milano design week 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)