Olivier LPB

Welcome on my talk page, you cann see my last talk page at :

• User talk:Olivier LPB/Archives(Beginning - 13 February 2017)
• User talk:Olivier LPB/Archives(14 February 2017 - 13 February 2018)
• User talk:Olivier LPB/Archives(14 February 2018 - 31 July 2018)

Daphnis protrudens

J’inaugure te nouvelle page de discussion pour te remercie de la promotion inespéré des cette espèce qui, contrairement à moi, le vaut bien. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Janus (two-headed tortoise) (Testudo graeca)- General view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:26, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of Beaumont-Village.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 09:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of Paul Henri Delatte.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Hyles

Je viens de voir deux promotions en QI pour Hyles je t'en remercie.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

• et pour Eumorpha translineatus! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Henri Delatte - Coat of arms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral: Single image scope. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 08:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 08:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de Sauguis - View from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Hyles and All

Merci pour les 3 hyles de ce matin en QI!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

• et Xylophanes haxairei ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
• Merci pour les promus du jour; je n'en reviens pas du score du set X.mirabilis en FP... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
• Merci pour les quatre du jour.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Xylophanes mirabilis mounted specimen, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Xylophanes mirabilis mounted specimen has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bishop Patrick McKinney Immingham 10.jpg

Copyright status: File:Bishop Patrick McKinney Immingham 10.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Patrick McKinney Immingham 10.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio (bis).jpg

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio (bis).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio (bis).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio.jpg

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 2.jpg

Copyright status: File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

• And extracted images Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 03:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
• Also
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - C.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - B.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - A.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 9.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 8.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 7.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 6.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 5.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 4.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 3.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 2.jpg
• File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 1.jpg

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 03:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: Hello, you have done a mistake, you can't change like that the licence. The bot has already validate the licence, but the author in flickr has probably change the licence on flickr after that. So no problem and I will revert your contribution if it is that. Olivier LPB (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

PDM

Public Domain Mark is not an irrevocable license as required by commons, and does not equate to cc-zero.Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

You don't understand, photos was published in Creative common licence. And after uploading in commons the author in flickr has changed the licence. The bot of uploadwizard confirm my words. So please stop change the licence tag. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

En français : les photos ont originellement été postées sur flickr sous licence creative commons. Le bot l'a vérifié lors de l'import. Que l'auteur du compte flickr change d'avis parès coup laisse néanmoins la licence libre irrévocable, néanmoins si ce dernier passe la licence en domaine public, cela ne pose pas de soucis. 11:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: peux tu venir m'expliquer si j'ai mal compris ? Olivier LPB (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Les images avec "Public Domain Mark" ne sont pas acceptées sur Commons, car ce n'est pas vraiment une licence. Il faudrait demander au titulaire du compte de changer la licence en {{Cc-0}}. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Cardinals Paul Poupard and Adrianus Johannes Simonis in 2017.jpg

Cardinals

Hello Olivier LPB, I saw this file in Category:Ad Simonis. What makes you think the cardinal on the right is Mgr Simonis? I think this is not correct. But I don't know who else it might be. - ArjanH (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@ArjanH: Hello, I have used the fr:Composition_actuelle_du_Collège_cardinalice to know which cardinal can be sit near Poupard. And I have hesitate between cardinals Friedrich Wetter and Ad Simonis. Olivier LPB (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@Olivier LPB: Thanks for your quick reply! Honestly I think it is neither one or the other, but looking at their hair it should be cardinal Wetter. Simonis only has hair on the sides of his head... Did you count alphabetically or is there another way of positioning the cardinals in the room? - ArjanH (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

In fact because this is a consistory, they must be in protocolary order (except for special positions like the secretary of State). I must see the video again to verify if in this configuration it is the descending order or ascending. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gwenriche‎

Bonjour, Pourriez-vous reformer votre message. Merci, et cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done Olivier LPB (talk) 08:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Armoiries de Mgr Dollmann

Bonjour Olivier LPB,

Est-il possible de modifier les armoiries de Mgr Vincent Dollmann svp ? Il est archevêque de Cambrai depuis le 15 août 2018, mais ses armoiries sur Wikipédia sont toujours celles d'un évêque. Il n'est pas métropolitain et n'a pas le privilège du pallium, mais il faudrait néanmoins lui ajouter une rangée de houppes vertes au chapeau et une croix à double traverse derrière l'écu. Si vous pouviez vous en occuper, je vous en serai reconnaissant.

Merci d'avance. In Christo. Arg95 (28.03.2019) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arg95 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour @Arg95: , en effet je peux m'en occuper. En fait généralement on ne modifie pas tout de suite car il arrive souvent que le prélat change de blason en changeant de siège, donc on attend de connaitre le blason si changement. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear Olivier LPB, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. -- Eatcha (talk) 17:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Olivier LPB, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 17:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:African Leopard Near Otavi Waterhole Etosha Namibia.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:African Leopard Near Otavi Waterhole Etosha Namibia.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean-Pierre Bosser, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Suppressions abusives

Bonjour Olivier,

Comme tu le sais, j'ai été bloqué sur Wikipédia après un petit pétage de plombs, mais, pour se venger, un administrateur dont je ne citerai pas le nom a supprimer des tas d'articles que j'avais créé. D'abord, il a supprimé plusieurs articles créés avec ce qu'il appelle des « faux-nez », après le blocage de mon compte « historique ».

Parmi d'autres :

• Groupe de Saint-Gall
• Sanctuaire Notre-Dame-d'Afrique
• Marie-Paul Farran

C'est, paraît-il, une possibilité donné par l'encyclopédie, alors pourquoi pas. Pour l'anecdote, certains articles ont été recréés et restaurés sous le nom de l'administrateur en question (ce qui est contraire aux règles, mais aussi illégal, puisqu'il s'attribue un travail qui n'est pas le sien), mais ça, ça ne me pose pas de problème (le conflit était d'ailleurs venu du fait que je souhaitais qu'on retire toute mention de mon pseudo, ce qui, comble de la farce, m'avait été refusé).

Plus gênant, certains articles avaient été créés avec mon compte, avant que celui-ci ne soit bloqué. Ils ont pourtant été supprimés de manière tout à fait illégitime ! L'administrateur est là dans le règlement de compte et ça, cela m'embête. Accepterais-tu de demander leur restauration ? Je t'en donne la liste :

• Martin Häusle
• Henry Sire
• Maison Lacordaire
• François de Penfentenyo
• Modestin de Jésus et Marie
• Caïus de Corée
• Maria et Giustina Schiapparoli

Je comprendrais tout à fait que tu refuses,

Bien cordialement,

Vannea — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB0C:24B:7100:81EE:9C4A:E8A3:FF1B (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488309442.jpg

And also:

• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28559359716.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28310835700.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 27979279053.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488308142.jpg
• File:Gerard Larcher with Mateusz Morawiecki in 2018.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28310826700.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28516676011.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28310823210.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28513750371.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488307712.jpg
• File:Wizyta w Watykanie (40747742650).jpg
• File:Wizyta w Watykanie.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26918493421.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28564730782.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26713370130.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488301202.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28386824680.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26382815053.jpg
• File:Wizyta w Watykanie (42556254881).jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28628211365.jpg
• File:Mateusz Morawiecki's family with Franciscus.jpeg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28564602182.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28310818690.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28564664722.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28516675641.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26713372090.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26381562054.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28310817610.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28592783191.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26918493081.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28628211265.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28054954543.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28010729434.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28343439350.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28638986516.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488312452.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26381564484.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28671120545.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło na mszy świętej z okazji 1050-lecia Chrztu Polski w Częstochowie - 28603903295.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło na mszy świętej z okazji 1050-lecia Chrztu Polski w Częstochowie - 27987957173.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło na mszy świętej z okazji 1050-lecia Chrztu Polski w Częstochowie - 27986734014.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło na mszy świętej z okazji 1050-lecia Chrztu Polski w Częstochowie - 27987956763.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło na mszy świętej z okazji 1050-lecia Chrztu Polski w Częstochowie - 27988549973.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło na mszy świętej z okazji 1050-lecia Chrztu Polski w Częstochowie - 27987956523.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26918493351.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26987011055.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28310822200.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 27978080404.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28639073886.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488307102.jpg

And also:

• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28310815880.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488303702.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28595193656.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28559359466.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28513749961.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28671118155.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28549114201.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28516666291.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28386821770.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28595193256.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28010729124.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28549114191.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28639085766.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło na mszy świętej z okazji 1050-lecia Chrztu Polski w Częstochowie.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło na mszy świętej z okazji 1050-lecia Chrztu Polski w Częstochowie - 28603903355.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28628211125.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28592928061.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28595193456.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28011702863.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28010728664.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28310838530.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28559360556.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 27979285583.jpg
• File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488307402.jpg
• File:Brzegi- Udział premier Beaty Szydło w Mszy Świętej - 28671107875.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28595192566.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28011703013.jpg
• File:Premier Szydło i papież Franciszek w Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau - 28549114641.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26713370610.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26987010895.jpg
• File:Wizyta w Watykanie - 26915561721.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26987010205.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26713371950.jpg
• File:Wizyta w Watykanie - 26711249480.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26987009975.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26381561954.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26953682356.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26713370290.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26892633042.jpg
• File:Wizyta Premier Beaty Szydło w Watykanie - 26382814873.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Wizyta w Watykanie (28682159358).jpg

And also:

• File:Wizyta w Watykanie (42556254741).jpg
• File:Wizyta w Watykanie (28682159618).jpg
• File:Wizyta w Watykanie (40747742890).jpg
• File:Wizyta w Watykanie (42556255011).jpg
• File:Mateusz Morawiecki and his wife in front of John Paul II's grave.jpeg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pietro Parolin with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018 (2).jpg

Copyright status: File:Pietro Parolin with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018 (2).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pietro Parolin with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018 (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 02:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pietro Parolin with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018.jpg

Copyright status: File:Pietro Parolin with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pietro Parolin with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 02:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio - 31111962820.jpg

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio - 31111962820.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio - 31111962820.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 03:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 3.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 3.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Chenzw. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Coat of arms of Franciscus.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Coat of arms of Franciscus.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Coat of arms of Franciscus.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Photo of the group - 1.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Photo of the group - 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Photo of the group - 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Photo of the group - 2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Photo of the group - 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Photo of the group - 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 1.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 4.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 4.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 4.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 5.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 5.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 6.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 6.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 6.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 7.jpg

Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 7.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 7.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:FlickreviewR 2. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Franciscus with Zoran Zaev and Zorica Zaeva during their trip in the Vatican City in 2018.jpg

And also:

• File:Franciscus with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018 - 1.jpg
• File:Franciscus with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018 - 2.jpg
• File:Franciscus with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018 - 3.jpg
• File:Franciscus with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018.jpg
• File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Photo of the group - 1.jpg
• File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Photo of the group - 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Pietro Parolin with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018.jpg

File:Pietro Parolin with Zoran Zaev during his trip in the Vatican City in 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Remerciements

Merci pour les deux faces du papillon promues ce matin en QI... Grace à toi je commence bien ma journée ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Pas de quoi ! Cela faisait longtemps que je n'avais rien fait à ce sujet ? Question : pourrais tu regarder ce qui cloche avec cette photo File:Église Notre-Dame-des-Ardilliers - Saumur - Instruments de la Passion - Cross and dices.jpg, j'ai utilisé ShiftN pour la corriger mais cela ne semble pas suffisant en procédure d'évaluation. Olivier LPB (talk) 07:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

@Olivier LPB: Tu as deux gros pbs : la correction de perspective et les aberrations chromatiques; et plusieurs détails dans : les tons, les couleurs, le netteté ... En combinant CameraRaw et Photoshop, on peut faire une nouvelle version. Je peux te l'envoyer sur ton Email. Fais moi un Email à partir de Commons en me donnant ton adresse et je t’expédie le résultat. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 1.jpg

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 2.jpg

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 4.jpg

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 5.jpg

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 6.jpg

File:Zoran Zaev's trip in The Vatican city - Swiss guards - 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pierre de Villiers par Claude Truong-Ngoc septembre 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)