Pbm

Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 19:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Irssi.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 02:09, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdansk Brama Stagiewna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It needs tilt correction. --Iifar 17:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Corrected. --Pbm 17:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC).  Support Fine with me now. --Iifar 10:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smołdziński Las - church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's pretty good, but imo needs a bit perspective distortion correction. --Iifar 17:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC) New version uploaded. --Pbm 18:03, 10 June 2012 (UTC).  Comment Not quite there yet. I uploaded new version from original file. Is it ok with you? --Iifar 10:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Sure. Thanks for help. --Pbm 15:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Seems ok to me. Mattbuck 21:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orelec - church 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 18:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jędruszkowce - shrine 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AzaToth 20:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Sanok Dąbrówka

Teraz przyznaję Ci rację:) Trochę pochopnie anulowałem twoją edycję, jako że myślałem że kategoria "Sanok Dąbrówka" to "Dąbrówka (Sanok)" i nie zorientowałem sie że to kategoria dla stacji. Zatem wszystko w porządku i przepraszam za zamieszanie. Pozdrawiam!! --Lowdown (talk) 08:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ParaRudniki 2012 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Częstochowa - Industriada 2010 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trondheim - buildings near Nidelva 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Danrok 19:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trondheim - Ladestien 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Ivar 09:45, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trondheim - cemtery near Nidaros Cathedral 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:08, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilleby train station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandefjord - ferry 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ParaRudniki 2012 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trondheim - cemtery near Nidaros Cathedral 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just about ok. --Mattbuck 13:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trondheim - Ladestien 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 13:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Częstochowa - Industriada 2010 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Isn't the back a bit blurry? This does not occur in the photo of FSO Warszawa 203.--Zyxist 17:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC) A bit borderline, but ok. Mattbuck 13:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trondheim - Lade Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now Poco a poco 16:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kijów - Sobór Mądrości Bożej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice atmosphere and colours imo but needs a slight perspective correction cw on the left of the cathedral (easy to fix). --JLPC 17:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Is it better now? Pbm 17:19, 29 June 2013 (UTC)--OK. --JLPC 20:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiev - St. Michael's Cathedral 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiev - St. Michael's Cathedral 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice quality. --Julian Herzog 19:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kijów - Sobór Mądrości Bożej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness improvable, but ok --Poco a poco 17:42, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiev - St. Michael's Cathedral 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Kiev - plaque 01.jpg

File:Kiev - plaque 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 17:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Kiev - plaque 02.jpg

File:Kiev - plaque 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 17:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Kiev - plaque 03.jpg

File:Kiev - plaque 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 17:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cherobyl - monument 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myślinów - church 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trondheim - buildings near Nidelva 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very small perspective issue is not disturbing. Don't be more catholic than the pope. --Smial 12:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Sandefjord - monument 01.jpg

File:Sandefjord - monument 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4ing (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Sandefjord - monument 02.jpg

File:Sandefjord - monument 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4ing (talk) 21:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Industriada

Witaj, po pierwsze dlatego ze nie sadze ze kiedyś powstanie 30 kategorii: jedna kategoria na jedno miasto. A po drugie dlatego ze od początku była kategoryzacja według roczników (2011, 2013) a nie według miasta (była tylko Częstochowa). Serdecznie pozdrawiam. --ThePolish 18:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegina - Panagitsa Church 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 18:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Re:Kijów - Sobór Mądrości Bożej 01.jpg

Powinieneś zawęzić scope, poprzez dopisanie "exposure from E" lub "view from E". W ten sposób w przyszłości jeżeli ktoś zrobi zdjęcie z innego kierunku, będzie mógł je również nominować do VI w innym scope.
Pzdr. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Sophia Cathedral in Kiev - view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment W scope brakuje kierunku geograficznego, z którego zostało wykonane zdjęcie. Poza tym brak geokodowania. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:58, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
• Fixed GPS coordinates added, scope changed. Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 17:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Sandefjord - monument 03.jpg

File:Sandefjord - monument 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4ing (talk) 21:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Sandefjord - monument 05.jpg

File:Sandefjord - monument 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4ing (talk) 21:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Sandefjord - monument 09.jpg

File:Sandefjord - monument 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4ing (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Sandefjord - monument 10.jpg

File:Sandefjord - monument 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4ing (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Sandefjord - monument 12.jpg

File:Sandefjord - monument 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4ing (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Use of image

Hi! As you asked, I tell you that used your image from Chernobyl in my post in facebook page --Visem (talk) 06:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Kiev - St. Michael's Cathedral plaque 02.jpg

File:Kiev - St. Michael's Cathedral plaque 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Doctor Architect (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Kiev - St. Michael's Cathedral plaque 01.jpg

File:Kiev - St. Michael's Cathedral plaque 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Doctor Architect (talk) 20:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Aegina - Cathedral of Saint Nectarios 01.jpg

File:Aegina - Cathedral of Saint Nectarios 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Chernobyl - power plant - reactor 4 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)