Straktur

Learn more about this page

Welcome!

Hello, Straktur, and welcome to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

First steps - will tell you everything you need to know about how to upload, what licenses are OK and what information to include in your image summary
Babel guide - Commons is truly international, here's how to handle some multilingual issues
Commons FAQ - has some answers to common Commons questions
The Community Portal - help us organise and improve our files
A Gallery of your images - please correct any that are untagged or orphans (put them in a category)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Commoner! If you haven't already done so, you might also want to open an account on a Wikipedia in your preferred language, or one of the other Wikimedia projects. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date. If you have any questions, drop a note on the village pump, the Help desk, or contact an administrator. I look forward to your contributions!

bitte füge deine Bilder einer Kategorie oder einem Artikel zu edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, vielen Dank für die von dir Commons zur Verfügung gestellten Bilder. Bitte gebe beim Hochladen von Bildern in die Commons auch immer eine passende Kategorie an oder füge die Bilder zu einem Artikel (englisch: Gallery) hinzu. Denn Bilder ohne Kategorie bzw. die nicht in Artikeln verlinkt sind können per Suchfunktion schwer gefunden werden ! Ich weis, es ist nicht immer einfach eine Kategorie zu finden. Suche Bilder zu dem Thema. Bei diesen Bildern sollte (hoffentlich) bereits eine Kategorie eingetragen sein. Verwende diese dann - wenn sinnvoll. Um die richtige Kategorie zu finden ist auch das Tool CommonsSense sehr hilfreich.

Solltest Du mehrere Bilder auf Commons hochgeladen haben, so findest Du hier alle Bilder Gallery Besten Dank für deine Unterstützung! --gildemax 22:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Straktur!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image:Schwalben.jpg was uncategorized on 7 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Graubner gotthard 1947.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Appelius.jpg edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Appelius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Stefan Appelius https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Appelius hat ein besseres Foto veröffentlicht und möchte die Löschung von file: appelius.jpg

--Straktur (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Warning edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Stop nominating files for deletion for nonsense reasons. Jcb (talk) 23:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ich beantrage die Löschung eigener Fotos. In Germany ist es leicht abgemahnt zu werden wegen Kleinigkeiten. Im Jahr 2017 musste ich 1300 Euro bezahlen. Deswegen nichts mehr in Wiki und Fotos raus aus Wiki: Abmahngefahr wegen Verletzung Datenschutz. I request the deletion of own photos. In Germany it is easy to be warned about things. In 2017, I had to pay 1300 euros. Therefore, nothing more in wiki and photos out of wiki: Danger due to breach of privacy.--Straktur (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Privacy violation with a picture of a public railway station with not a single person visible? Jcb (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Am Abmahnen verdienen in DE Rechtsanwälte gut. Gesetze werden geändert. Rechtsanwälte bieten Abbo (40 Euro pro Monat), um Abmahnungen zu vermeiden. Es ist schwierig, der "Rechtslage" zu folgen. Also besser nichts tun. At admonish lawyers deserve well. Laws are changed. Lawyers offer Abbo (40 euros per month) to avoid warnings. It is difficult to follow the "legal situation". So do not do anything better. --Straktur (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please see Commons:Forum#Abmahngefahr?. There should be nothing to worry about. Jcb (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

die Mafia freut sich. De ist kein Rechtsstaat mehr. the mafia is happy. De is no longer a constitutional state.--Straktur (talk) 19:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry, but you can't expect me to take such claims for granted. And I am totally aware of what corruption is, I have been fighting corruption for over ten years in third world countries. Jcb (talk) 19:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

They are fighting - and are they still alive? I give up. No photo, no comment in Wiki. 500 photos are in it from me. Where do you live? --Straktur (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

As you can see at my user page, I live quite close to Germany. I know some German people personally. I don't have the impression that you view of your country is shared by the majority of German citizens. Jcb (talk) 21:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Abmahnungen deuten auf begangenes Unrecht hin, die übliche Meinung. Firmen vermeiden deshalb, davon zu berichten. Durch die Abmahnung habe ich recherchiert. Das Abmahnen ist Betrug, gesetzlich möglich. Der Abmahner kann den Streitwert und damit sein Honorar selbst festlegen. Und es gibt den fliegenden Gerichtsstand: der Abmahner darf bei Einspruch das Gericht auswählen. Damit wird die Justiz befangen,kann nicht neutral gegen Unrecht der Abgeordneten ermitteln. Warnings point to committed injustice, the usual opinion. Companies therefore avoid reporting it. By my warning, I have researched: The admonition is fraud, legally possible. The Abmahner can determine the amount in dispute and thus his fee. And there is the flying jurisdiction: the Abmahner may appeal the court. This will jail the judiciary, can not neutralize the deputies' injustice.--Straktur (talk) 05:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Röhnschafherde.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Röhnschafherde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bikerhiker75 (talk) 06:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic