Taw

Pa76.chojnow.sdi.tpnet.pl (talk)

Welcome

Hello Taw, welcome to the Commons. A nice page to start is the Commons:Community Portal which offers a helpful navigation (the polish version still needs translation, perhaps you´re able to help). You can use the babel tags on your user page instead of the raw text about your language abilities if you want :-)

On the chat we talked about Kraśnik, I put all photos from today in there. So please put further images of this city in that gallery too and have a look to Category:Poland to browse trough comparable galleries.

If you need special help for difficult things in your language ask Paweł, Tomasz or Rafał, they may help.

So long, greetings from :Bdk: 05:20, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Good work. Well, I´ve seen that there are more towns with a close name ;-)

It would be great if you can always categorize new gallery pages (as I did here). Also interwiki links are useful. Regards --:Bdk: 04:29, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Wroclaw hala ludowa1.jpg

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Wrocław.

EugeneZelenko 13:29, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Poznań

Fotki opisałem, nie rozpoznałem jedynie kominów ;), jednak nie miałem czsu przetłumaczyć opisów na angielski. Fotki mozesz dorzucić do artykułu Poznań, większośc obiektow jet, więc znajdziesz. Z tego co nie ma to: Cytadela to Stare Miasto, a Świerczewski to Grunwald. Świetna fotka wnętrza fary z organami Ladegasta! ISa i ISU mozna zaś wrzucić do ich artykułów Iosef Stalin tank, ISU-122 (zresztą są tam te same maszyny). Pozdrawiam Radomil 10:30, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Admin

You are now an admin her on Commons. Congratulations! villy ♦ ✎ 18:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

User:Mathiasrex

Please explain this user that (s)he must provide author name in addition to {{PD-old}}/{{PD-Art}} and add images to page/category. Could you please also watch Commons:Bar, which I believe is best place to ask Polish administrators for help. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 15:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Ban na IRC-u

Może mi Pan wyjaśnić, z jakich powodów dostałem bana na IRC-u?

Kondzio1990 10:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:1zl r.gif and other

This image of an polosh coin and a lot of other are now without copyright information. I think you have the infos, so it is the easiest way, when you add a copyright tag. -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Saarbrucken saar 0137.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Saarbrucken saar 0137.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 16:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Come on, you should have taken a quick look at my contribution page instead of pasting silly templates :-)

It's just the dumb upload form that can't be made remember the licence selection and defaults to none. Taw 16:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't want to insult you. MediaWiki:Quick-delete.js is so handy script :-) --EugeneZelenko 16:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

And is there some script for automatically selecting {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} in the upload form ? Taw 23:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

I think wikitech-l is best place to ask such questions. --EugeneZelenko 14:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Commons-l subscription

Hello Taw,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Admin news

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)

Prześwit

Chciałem zrobić trick na mojej stronie usera, taki jak udał się w prawym dolnym rogu na stronie Sanbeca, lecz to się nie udaje. Admini z pl wiki powiedzieli, że to najprawdopodobniej błąd renderera rsvg i zamiast niego mam pewnie imagemagicka. Możesz mi powiedzieć co Ty o tym myślisz?

PS. Odbanowano mnie z pl wiki. Pietras1988 09:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Administrative notice

Deutsch

Hi. This message is sent out to you because you are an administrator on Commons, and you made little use (or no use) of the admin tools lately: less than 5 times in the last five months.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a poll among users). According to that policy, admins who use their tools infrequently will be asked whether they still need their adminship, and if they do not respond or require them the removal of the tools will be requested.

If you feel you still need your admin tools, please sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days from the date this message was sent out. However, if you then don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will lose the adminship without any notice.

This is not a comment on the considerable help you have given to the project in the past but reflects the wish of the community to see active administrators and to ensure that possible security breaches are minimized.

This message is sent out by bot. If you want to give feedback on it, you can do so here — 08:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jaroszowka konie 09270023.jpg, Image:Jaroszowka konie 09270024.jpg, Image:Jaroszowka konie 09270032.jpg, Image:Jaroszowka konie 09270032.jpg, Image:Jaroszowka konie 09270033.jpg, Image:Jaroszowka konie 09270034.jpg, Image:Jaroszowka konie 09270035.jpg, Image:Jaroszowka konie 09270032.jpg,

If you know the breed of the horse, please mention it in the description. We have a lack of photos for the articles of Horse breeds but don't need much additional photos without known breed. --Kersti 22:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Semen.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Semen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 17:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Krasnik 069 drzewo.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Krasnik 069 drzewo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 14:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Krasnik 061 mlyn.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Krasnik 061 mlyn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 14:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Krasnik 057 kosciol.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Krasnik 057 kosciol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 14:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Taw!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 03:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Poznan 39 koziolki.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Goliszow wieza kosciola 09270016.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Wroclaw uniwersytet.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Poznan 37 koziolki.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Poznan 40 koziolki.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Poznan 38 koziolki.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Poznan 36 koziolki.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Goliszow wieza kosciola 09270015.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Poznan 07 kominy.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Poznan_57_armata.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Poznan_57_armata.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Poznan_57_armata.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

I have tagged this file either because it has no source whatsoever, or because the given source does not give enough information about its author or its date, making the copyright status of the file incertain. In any case, please don't ignore this message, contact me instead if you have more information or if you want to discuss the issue. Eusebius (talk) 20:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

File:23c3_by_taw_female_nerds_1.jpg

File:23c3_by_taw_female_nerds_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Taw, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Form of Government.png

File:Form of Government.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)