User talk:Tuxyso/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Emscherkunst Tanzender Strommast Zauberlehrling 04 Crop.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emscherkunst Tanzender Strommast Zauberlehrling 04 Crop.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Zeche Zollverein Schacht 12 Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg

Hallo, bin bei der Kategorisierung von Special:ListFiles/Fernost auf dein Bild und die 2. Bildversion gestoßen. Wollte schon {{Split}} reinsetzen aber hab dann gesehen, dass die Bilder identisch sind (Motiv) und es würd vielleicht komisch aussehen (Uploader/Urheber?) Das aktuelle Bild (1. und 3. Version) zeigt ja am linken und rechten Rand weniger als das größere "Originalbild" von Fernost. Hast oder hattest du die größere und weniger knallige Version, die Fernost da einen Tag später als Test hochgeladen hatte, noch woanders stehen? Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Holger1959! Ich kann mich erst in ein paar Tagen um deine Frage kümmern. Ich habe die Originaldateien auf jeden Fall als RAW-Dateien zur Verfügung. Vermutlich hatte ich seinerzeit eine Originalversion zu Demonstrationszwecken in meine private Dropbox kopiert. Warum der Benutzer Fernost die Datei ohne meine Einverständnis (ich kann mich zumindest nicht daran erinnern) einfach hochgeladen hat, weiß ich nicht. Was ist denn genau der Hintergrund deiner Anfrage? Möchtest du selbst einen Bearbeitungsversuch vornehmen? --Tuxyso (talk) 21:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Mir war das nur aufgefallen und ich wollt wissen ob "split" sinnvoll wär (mach ich öfter bei größeren Abweichungen zwischen den Versionen, und eigentlich immer bei wirklich verschiedenen Motiven wenns vom gleichen Uploader ist). Aber es konnt ja auch sein, dass die 2. Version unter anderem Namen vielleicht noch auf dewiki liegt und ich die nur nicht gefunden hab, dann wärs ja überflüssig oder aber die 2. Version könnt auch gelöscht werden. Wir haben natürlich eine Menge Bilder von Zollverein, da kommts auf eine Variante mehr oder weniger nicht so an. Dacht jedenfalls es ist besser dich einfach zu fragen, ob/was zu tun ist. Bearbeitungen fremder Bilder überlass ich lieber anderen, hab ich nicht so das Händchen für. Holger1959 (talk) 22:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anartia amathea 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anartia amathea 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio lowi 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doelen Hotel Amsterdam 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Egmond aan Zee Leuchtturm Teilansicht 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bananenfalter Caligo memnon 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Egmond aan Zee Leuchtturm 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. Huge level of information and nice work. --Slaunger 08:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Good quality --Llez 04:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice moment --The Photographer 00:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theater Schouwburg Het Park 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That helped! Good quality. --Slaunger 05:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purmerends Museum Stadthuis 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autofähre Dokter Wagemaker in Den Helder 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus Linie 29 auf Texel 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hervormde kerk, Den Burgh 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junge Silbermöwe im Flug bei Texel 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent -- Spurzem 11:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent -- Spurzem 11:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autofähre Dokter Wagemaker in Den Helder 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would choose another crop. --XRay 15:29, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purmerend Pferderennen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenenplaats Den Burg Texel 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK (but why not cropping to exactly 1:1?) --A.Savin 11:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC) It has not special reason. I never use fixed ratios but crop in a way that important elements are visible and composition looks good. --Tuxyso 07:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 02 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 02 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

• Please remember to move the nomination page too while moving the file. Otherwise it creates some strange results. :) Jee 07:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jee! Thanks for your information. I've just forgotten to move the nom page after renaming. I will remember for the next time. Thanks for your work. Kind regards, --Tuxyso (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama Egmond aan Zee Leuchtturm 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama Egmond aan Zee Leuchtturm 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Fairlane Victoria Sedan 1957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi, nice contrast with the i3 --Poco a poco 19:55, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Panoramic_Overview_from_Glacier_Point_over_Yosemite_Valley_2013_Alternative.jpg

I'd like to Reverts Colin for back to version MerveillePédia (adding very little blurry pixels that are interesting). MerveillePédia (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

• Please keep the photo as it is, MerveillePédia. It became featured in the version without the tiny area at the right and it is a bad idea to recover any previous (non-featured) versions. Accept the current crop as individual decision of the creator (me!). I think it is a bad habit to do reverts without asking the creator as you've done it here. Thus, thanks Colin for the revert of the revert. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Mülheim vom Rathausturm Richtung NW 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! --DXR 19:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Mülheim vom Rathausturm Richtung NW Crop 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hervormde kerk, Den Burgh Unteransicht 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:38, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

QICbot confusion

Ich will jetzt nicht auch noch Öl aufs Feuer gießen, aber vielleicht kannst Du Herrn Böhringer mitteilen, dass es auch für einen erfahrenen Commoners mit 14000 Bildern nicht geht, dass er einfach Photos, die bereits in CR sind, einfach nochmals tagesaktuell nominiert. Das kann der Bot überhaupt nicht auseinanderhalten. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Vielleicht schaut sich die ganze Sache mal ein Admin wie z.B. Steinsplitter an. Ich verliere bei der Angelegenheit langsam den Überblick. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

mach ich jetzt nur noch Fehler? Die Bilder wurden vom bot nicht mangels QI entfernt sondern wegen der einseitigen Diskussion die 2 Tage dauerte. Ich kenne auch keine Regel, trotz erfahrener Usertätigkeit, die eine erneute Nominierung untersagt. Ich habe aber kein Problem damit, wenn sie entfernt werden. Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 10:55, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Man braucht hier keine Regel, sondern schiere Logik: Wenn eine Diskussion unter CR läuft - und einige deiner Bilder dort haben ja bereits reviews dort - dann werden sie erst abschließend ausgewertet, wenn mindestens 2 Tage nach der letzten Meinungsäußerung jemand manuell den QICresult-Tag setzt. Gleichzeitig wird aber der Bot automatisch zwei Tage nach einem gültigen  Oppose oder  Support bei den regulären Nominierungen tätig. Das heisst, es kann folgendes passieren: Ein Bild wird in der regulären Review abgelehnt. Gleichzeitig läuft aber noch die CR und - sagen wir mal zwei Wochen später - wird das Bild mit 3:2 Stimmen angenommen. Das ist überhaupt nicht Sinn der Sache. Gewertet wird entweder im regulären Review oder im Consensual Review, aber nicht gleichzeitig in beiden Institutionen. Wenn dafür keine explizite Regel aufgestellt wurde, dann wahrscheinlich, weil bisher noch niemand drauf gekommen ist, dass jemand das Quality Assessment zweigleisig durchlaufen wollte. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

danke für die Erklärung. Ist halt doch ein Urwald,diese Commons. --Böhringer (talk) 12:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Aleppo Pines grove, Pinet, Hérault 02.jpg

Hi Tuxyso, new version uploaded a bit more dramatic... have a nice day.-- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 12:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserbahnhof Mülheim Morgen 03 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserbahnhof Mülheim am Morgen 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Ruhrnatur am Morgen 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserbahnhof Mülheim Morgen 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casino Mülheim 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadthalle Schlossbrücke Mülheim am Morgen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Hallo

Tuxyso, hab mir gerade ein paar Bilder auf commons von dir angesehen. Respekt, auch zu deiner Ausrüstung (bes. Objektive). Ich bin auch Nikonianer;-) und hab mir vor 3 Monaten die D800 geleistet (vorher D200), Vollformat hat schon was, die passenden Objektive fehlen mir aber noch. --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Hannes 24! Schön, dass dir meine Fotos gefallen. Mit dem Vollformat liebäugele ich auch schon längere Zeit. Mit dem kürzlichen Kauf der D7100 habe ich mich aber erst mal wieder für längere Zeit dagegen entschieden. "Notfalls" habe ich über einen befreundeten Fotografen Zugriff auf eine D800, die natürlich eine ganz herausragende Kamera ist, Glückwunsch zu dem Kauf! Ich bin allerdings immer noch glühender Anhänger des DX-Formats. Für mich lässt das DX-Format momentan keine Wünsche offen(Ok zwei vielleicht: es gibt momentan von Nikon de facto kein vernünftiges DX-Standardzoom und T&S-Objekive sind nicht sinnvoll an DX nutzbar). Selbst bei verschiedenen Hochzeiten von Freunden, die ich fotografiert habe, bin ich super mit meiner DX-Ausrüstung ausgekommen - mit dem AF-S 85mm f/1.8 und einem gute 2.8er Tele bekommst du auch an DX gute Porträts hin. Richtig begeistert bin ich momentan von dem Sigma 18-35 f/1.8, das eine herausragende Bildqualität liefert - die D7100 ist hinsichtlich ihrer Pixeldichte ja sogar noch eine größere Objektivdiva als die D800 :) Naja eine "FX-Objektivliste" für deine D800 hätte ich schon im Sinn:

• Holy Trinity:
  • Nikom AF-S 14-24 f/2.8
  • Nikon AF-S 24-70 f/2.8
  • Nikon AF-S 70-200 f/2.8 VR II
• Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 - für sein Geld ein super Objektiv, steht dem 1.4er in der Schärfe nicht nach
• Nikon PC-E 24mm f/3.5
• und noch ein schönes Macro :)

Welche Objektive hast du denn bisher und in welche Richtung möchtest du aufrüsten? --Tuxyso (talk) 18:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Ich hab noch ältere "gute" Objektive, mit denen ich mit FILM fotografiert habe: Nikon 80-200/2,8 ohne AF, 300/4,0, das vorige 24-120 ohne VR, 18-135, 28/2,8, Sigma 400/5,6... Zur D800 hab ich mir als Universalzomm das 24-120/4 VRII genommen, (wenn ich für die Pfarre fotografiere). In letzter Zeit beschäftige ich mich mehr mit Digiskopie (bin auch Amateur-Ornithologe), aber da bekommt man nur Belegfotos (sehr selten gute Aufnahmen - wenn das Licht passt). Ich hab das KOWA 883 + Pana G1+Standardzoom. Aber da gibt es auch schon viel bessere Systemkameras (G4 oder dvon Sony) und Spektive (das neue Swarovski ATX95). Alles sehr teuer;-) Das 24-70/2.8 werd ich einem Kollegen abkaufen, ein lichtstarkes Weitwinkel möcht ich mir auch zulegen. Alles eine Finazierungsfrage lool --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Du bist thematisch ja sehr breit aufgestellt. Deine Liste der Artikel über Adelsgeschlechter ist beeindruckend. Kennst du dich dementsprechend auch gut mit Herladik aus? Ein (nach dem ersten Eindruck) sehr gutes und erschwingliches Tele-Zoom für deinen Vogel-Anwendungsbereich ist sichherlich das nagelneue Tamron 150-600. Ich konnte damit einige Fotos auf der Photokina machen und was insbesondere von der tollen Verarbeitung und Mechanik sehr angetan (ansonsten habe ich eine ziemliche Tamron-Phobie). Hast du dieses schon auf dem Radar gehabt? Wenn du bei Nikon bleiben möchtest wird es leider schnell sehr teuer. Für Weitwinkel wird wohl kein Weg am 14-24er vorbeiführen :) --Tuxyso (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

(sorry, schau nicht täglich hier vorbei) Bei mir ergibt sich immer aus einem Projekt (100 Punkte für Unterbringung dieses Wortes;-) das/die Nachfolgeprojekte (nochmals 50 Zusatzpunkte). Bei mir war es die Pfarrkirche meiner Heimatgemeinde => Franz Anton Pilgram, deren Entwerfer => die Vorfahren von FAP => das Adelsgeschlecht Pilgram => österreichischer Adel + derjenige der Habsburgermonarchie => protestantischer österreichischer Adel um 1620. Da hab ich mich jetzt verbissen. Das ist ein herrlich komplexes Thema. Spannend ist, dass man richtig Detektiv spielen kann/muss, um Zusammenhänge zu finden, da Literatur und Quellen über die evangelisch-österr. Adeligen sehr verstreut sind.

Ja das neue Tamron soll toll sein. Ich steh normal auch mehr auf Sigma, wenn Fremdobjektiv. --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 01 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 01 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint Agneskerk Egmond with shopping Street 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:54, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestantse kerk Egmond 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shopping Center Magna Plaza Amsterdam 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --ArildV 08:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC)  CommentNice but I think it should be more centered, look at the columns above and below --Livioandronico2013 08:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)  Done, please take another look. --Tuxyso 08:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good --Livioandronico2013 09:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Even better now. --ArildV 09:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Mülheim vom Rathausturm Richtung S 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Veltnis Arena Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veltnis Arena Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Hubertl 17:03, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinruhrzentrum Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Eigenwillig

Hi,

schon eine sehr eigenwillige Auslegung, ein klar unterbelichtetes und durch die Wolken sehr schattiges Objekt wie in diesem Bild als FP zu bewerten und im Falle von Schloss Lenzburg wenige Schattenpartien zum Problemfall zu erklären. Übrigens warst du auch der einzige, der die angenehme Herbstsonne für ungeeignet erklärt hat. --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Taxiarchos228, wenn du mit meine Einschätzung zu einem Bild nicht einverstanden bist, kommentiere das bitte an passender Stelle und nicht hier auf meiner Talk-Seite. Ich habe einfach keine Lust mehr mit dir zu diskutieren. Deinem Unmut hast du ja (zum wiederholten Male) Luft gemacht. Akzeptiere doch einfach mal, wenn jemand eine andere Meinung hat als du. Bedenke bei deinen (nicht selten überheblichen) Kommentaren, dass die ganze Sache hier ein Hobby-Projekt ist, bei dem der Spaß im Vordergrund stehen sollte und man Leuten auch schnell den Spaß verderben kann. Dazu gehört unter anderem auch, dass man seinen Mitstreitern freundlich und vor allem mit Respekt begegnet, auch wenn man sie (bis auf 4-5 User, deren Bilder man bewundert) allesamt für dümmer hält (bzw. unterbelichteter, um im Foto-Jargon zu bleiben) als man selbst.
Ich bin übrigens kein Herdentier und vertrete eine eigene Meinung, s. z.B. mein Kommentar zu deine Pucki-Nominierung bei den KEBs. Verschone mich zukünftig schlicht mit vagen Vermutungen über mein Abstimmungsverhalten und Motiven, die diesem zu Grunde liegen. Um noch mal auf dein Bild zu kommen, bei dem dich meine Contra-Stimme scheinbar schwer getroffen hat: Mir gefallen deine Schattenfotos einfach nicht. Dabei ist es für mich unerheblich, ob das nun weiche oder harte Schatten sind. Da du dich selbst als Architekturfotograf bezeichnest, wirf mal einen Blick in das wirklich lesenswerte Buch von Adrian Schulz über Architekturfotografie. Dort wirst du nicht ein einziges Bild finden, bei dem die Hälfte eines Gebäudes im (weichen) Schatten liegt. Er setzt auch Schatten und Schattenwurf ein, aber viel gezielter als das bei deinen letzten Schattennominierungen, bei denen ich jeweils mit Contra gestimmt habe, der Fall war. Freue dich doch lieber, dass du wieder ein FP-Siegel mehr hast trotz meiner Contra-Stimme statt dich über einzelne Stimmen aufzuregen. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

In deinem eigenen Sinn und im Sinne eines gesitteten Umgangs mit mir sei folgendes angeraten: Löse dich von der Vorstellung, ich würde hier irgendwelche Dinge als Unmutbekundung deiner Person gegenüber durchführen. Hätte ich ein generelles Problem mit dir oder deinen Bildern würde ich mich aktuell wohl kaum gegen die Löschung deines Luftbildes aussprechen. Ich habe auch keinerlei Problem damit, wenn stichhaltige Argumente ins Feld bezogen werden oder ein schlichtes "spricht mich nicht an" geäußert wird. Auch Bauchentscheidungen wie diese halte ich für durchaus legitim.

Womit ich dann aber schon ein Problem habe und das muss ich auch nicht auf der Kandidatenseite thematisieren: Wenn jemand sachlich nachweislich falsche Aussagen trifft um damit seine Meinung zu begründen. Es ist schlichtweg sachlich nicht haltbar, dass mehr als 50% von Hügel und Bauwerk im Schatten liegen würden. Die Bereiche mit Schatten einzukringeln und im Dreisatz das Gegenteil zu beweisen ist mir wahrlich zu blöde. Aber du wirst selbst wissen, dass dein Argument nicht haltbar ist. Dass du hier völlig Banane argumentierst merkt man nicht zuletzt daran, dass du der einzige bist der Schattenpartien zu erkennen glaubt wo keine sind sondern auch daran, dass Colin (als kritischer Bewerter bei FP bekannt) trotz Kontra gerada die herausragende Lichtsituation würdigt.

Ganz generell: Wo Licht ist, ist auch Schatten und erst das gefällige Wechselspiel von beidem macht ein Bild interessant. Sicher können durchaus auch interessante Objekte komplett ohne Schatten auch punkten. Aber du weißt so gut wie ich, dass gerade in der Architekturfotografie praktisch nie ein Bauwerk ohne irgendeinen Schatten ablichtbar ist. Gerade du, der völlige Schattenfreiheit zu propagieren scheint nominiert übrigens auch Bilder, die sehr häufig zumindest von einem Teilschatten bedeckt werden. Manchmal geht das auf, manchmal nicht. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Im Gegensatz zu deinen Aufnahmen befindet sich "mein" Schatten allerdings auf irgendeiner Wiese oder einem davor liegenden Platz (s. z.B. Aalto-Theater). Warum du dort beispielsweise den Schatten als ernsthaftes Contra-Argument anführst, wenn das Hauptobjekt in toller Abendsonne erscheint, kann ich echt nicht verstehen. Schatten und insbesondere Licht sollte die Aufmerksamkeit auf dein Hauptmotiv lenken - beim Aalto-Theater gelungen, bei deiner Burgaufnahme aus meiner Sicht nicht. Und noch mal: Mir ist es völlig egal, ob andere das auch so sehen oder nicht - es ist eine Meinung von etlichen anderen, also so what? Das Licht deiner Aufnahme mag schön sein, für die Betonung deines Motivs ist es aber unvorteilhaft. Den Begründungen dazu (und den dortigen Hinweisen auf simple Mathematik) ist nichts hinzuzufügen. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Warum schönes Licht und eine klare Aufnahme eines Bauwerks unvorteilhaft sein soll bleibt dein Geheimnis. Beim Aalto-Bau in Essen war es 1. Schlagschatten was sicher nicht als schönes Licht gelten kann und 2. haben mich dort die Mülltonnen massiv gestört. Es geht bei deiner Stimme auch nicht um fehlende Konformität sondern objektiv falschen Tatsachenbehauptungen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Veltnis Arena Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg

File:Veltnis Arena Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 18:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Shopping Center Magna Plaza Amsterdam 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shopping Center Magna Plaza Amsterdam 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Magna Plaza Amsterdam 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of la Asunción, Cómpeta 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC) could you please synchronize the time? Watch and your own timestamp? ;-)--Hubertl 08:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möbel Ostermann Bottrop Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. IMO contrast could be better. --XRay 08:47, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Für das Bild der Erlöserkirche in Mülheim! Aarp65 (talk) 13:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Für das Panorama des Marktplatzes von Heißen! Aarp65 (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwillingshaus Bad Mergentheim 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:31, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bananenfalter Caligo memnon 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bananenfalter Caligo memnon 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südafrika-Kronenkranich im Flug 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südafrika-Kronenkranich Jungtier im Flug 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 10:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St Diego Skyline Panorama 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Diego Skyline Panorama 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Letterboxes Ocotillo Wells 2013 Crop.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Letterboxes Ocotillo Wells 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutschordensmuseum Bad Mergentheim 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better. --DXR 17:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riesenseeadler Walsrode 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:59, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basstölpel Walsrode Herbst 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI -- Spurzem 13:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riesenseeadler Walsrode 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothalskasuar Walsrode 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 12:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. Should be renamed to Wal_s_rode though. --Kreuzschnabel 12:28, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment What about the new rule of max. 5 nominations per day? I think you should move some images to the next day (to November 16) --Halavar 01:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC) The rules have been voted upon and approved, but the changes have not yet been made to the guidelines. Good enough quality. --Ram-Man 04:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC} Halavar, I did not note that the guidelines had changed. If you take a look on the number of reviews at 2014/11/15 my QIC are clearly no flooding. But next time I will stick to this five of a day rule. --Tuxyso 07:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)  Info The new rules are yet not put into force. Especially as there is yet no consens about handling the surplus nominations. --Cccefalon 11:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riesenseeadler Walsrode 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The bird is well-exposed imo. --DXR 11:42, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzkopfsteinhuhn klein und gross Walsrode 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 13:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basstölpel Walsrode Herbst 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basstölpel Walsrode Herbst 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichsburg Cochem beleuchtet 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice,but maybe a little too red? --Livioandronico2013 20:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC) It all depends on the white balance. From my memory the illumination was quite red.  Done Nonetheless you are right a bit too red. I made moderate corrections. --Tuxyso 20:59, 3 December 2014 (UTC)  Awesome! --Livioandronico2013 21:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:29, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

Hi Medium69! Thanks for your information regarding new PH-4 template. Is there a (formal) definition for PH-4? PH-4 = a lot of featured pictures, PH-3 = a lot of quality images? Or is PH-4 only for professional, non-hobby photographers? Probably Alchemist-hp can provide additional information who marked himself as PH-4. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

I would say those who believe take professional quality photos. In your case and the various promotions that should be applicable. Sorry my english ; Google is my friend for the translation --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 20:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rieselfelder Stauwehr 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment View notes. Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)  Done I've removed the dust spots and slightly reduced clarity on the water surface. Please take another look. --Tuxyso 00:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Very good --Rjcastillo 00:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schuhschnabel Weltvogelpark Walsrode 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks a lot George for your friendly greetings. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EON Ruhrgas Blaue Stunde Winter 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

FP

I fixed this image. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Super Ruhr-Fotografie!

Mir sind deine Bild aus dem Ruhrgebiet aufgefallen. Ein Lob hierzu! Super Bilder!

--Andreas V. (talk) 13:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Andreas V.! Vielen Dank für dein Lob - das hört man gerne und motiviert mich weiter zu machen. Bist du auch fotografisch unterwegs? Mein schönstes Foto aus dem Ruhrgebiet aus 2014 ist aus meiner Sicht File:Emscherkunst Tanzender Strommast Zauberlehrling 04 Crop.jpg, falls du es schon entdeckt hast.--Tuxyso (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Sehr gerne,Tuxyso! Motivation ist immer gut :-) Viele Artikel bedürfen aktuellerer und besserer Bilder. Dein Bild vom Zauberlehrling gefällt mir gut. Du hast aber auch sehr viele andere gute Bilder! Ich bin fotografisch auch gerne im Ruhrgebiet unterwegs. Es gibt so viel zu sehen und abzufotografieren :) Ich habe ein paar Bilder hochgeladen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Eurext --Andreas V. (talk) 21:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnadenkirche Mülheim Innenraum 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Disturbing people but QI -- Spurzem 21:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reitstall Heesen Mülheim Winkhausen Hansberg 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 02:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick ueber Essen aus Richtung Muelheim 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernblick auf Skyline von Essen und Schönebeck 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kennedy-Tower-Essen-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Komplettpanorama-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:27, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Oberhausen-Kleines-Schloss-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality.--ArildV 09:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Pano-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments near perfect, just one error IMO (see note) --Christian Ferrer 13:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)  Done Please take another look. --Tuxyso 15:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)I see a little bit the correction but that's ok, I found another one (see note) --Christian Ferrer 16:02, 18 April 2015 (UTC) Complete new stitching (a lot of work!). All errors should be fixed now. --Tuxyso 07:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Support excellent work --Christian Ferrer 08:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willy-Brandt-Schule-Muelheim-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 08:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Pano-2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Pano-2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom Maria Himmelfahrt Bozen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality;--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ortszentrum Schenna mit Pfarrkirche Rathaus und Tourismusbuero 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ortszentrum Schenna mit Maria Himmelfahrt 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Häuserreihe am Waltherplatz 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 22:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Innungshaus Haus des Handwerks Mülheim 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. I think it was difficult to get this image. -- Spurzem 20:24, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Warum schwierig, Lothar? Die Straße, auf der ich stehe ist momentan baustellenbedingt kaum befahren. Oder meinst du etwas anderes? --Tuxyso 20:40, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Ja, ich meinte, dass es schwierig war, das große Haus aus relativ kurzer Entfernung fotografiert fast ohne Verzerrungen darzustellen. -- Spurzem 21:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Habe auch nichts mit Software entzerrt, Kamera hochkant und gerade und dann zugeschnitten. --Tuxyso 21:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Saubere Umsetzung ohne Bildverzerrung, so ist es richtig. Klar ein Qi. --Ralf Roletschek 21:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick auf Kuens und Riffian von Schenna 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passeiertal von Kuens mit Blick nach Meran 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 20:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Texelgruppe Hohe Wilde 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passeiertal und Meran von Schenna 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 13:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonie Kaiserswerth Pforte 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonie Kaiserswerth Verwaltungsgebäude 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornplatz Bozen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obstmarkt Torgglhaus Bozen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonie Kaiserswerth Mutterhaus 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Ifinger Schenna von Kuens 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and high quality. --King of Hearts 09:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Johannesberg Cafe Gilf Meran 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ernst Rasche Brunnen Platzgestaltung ohne Titel 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 22:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus Mülheim Mosaik 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 22:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rembergschule Mülheim 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche St. Nikolaus Meran 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtgymnasium Meran 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ensemble-Auerstraße-Georgstraße-Mülheim-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick auf Hohe Wilde Texelgruppe 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpness is OK IMHO, nice composition. --C messier 15:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Texelgruppe Hohe Wilde 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Texelgruppe Hohe Wilde 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Ausgezeichnete Arbeit Ermell (talk) 06:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank,Ermell für deine Wertschätzung. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Townhall-Essen-2012.jpg

File:Townhall-Essen-2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.149.157 21:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hafen Los Cristianos von Montana Chayofita 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obststand-Mercado de Nuestra Señora de Africa 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It's a pity that the seller does not smile. -- Spurzem 14:52, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Mülheim an der Ruhr vom Bismarckturm 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Club Nautico Puerto Colon von Playa La Pinta 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:37, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruga Kranichwiese und Dahlienarena von Grugaturm 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Essen City von Grugaturm 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Clément Bardot 18:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schildkröte auf Kubakrokodil Monkey Park 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality en bijzonder.--Famberhorst 07:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Caleta Fischrestaurant 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now, thanks. --DXR 07:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wellenbrecher Strand Los Cristianos von Hafenmauer 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizon not horizontal. Otherwise ok. --Cccefalon 08:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)  Done Please take another look, Cccefalon. --Tuxyso 09:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universitätsklinikum Essen vom Grugaturm 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp but for me not enough contrast between the tower at the left and the sky. -- Spurzem 19:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Mensch, Lothar, das kann doch echt nicht dein Ernst sein... --Tuxyso 19:14, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Doch. Unmittelbar über dem orangefarbenen Teil ist kaum ein Übergang zwischen Gebäude und Himmel zu sehen. Das ganze Bild ist ziemlich hell. -- Spurzem 20:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Ich weiß nicht, woran es liegt: Das Bild wirkt hier blasser als in KEB. Nun auch hier QI. -- Spurzem 21:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC) - another look on request, yes, it´s QI - and FP! - for me! --Hubertl 12:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hermannsdenkmal-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figur westliche Plattform Hermannsdenkmal 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel Hermannsdenkmal Ernst von Bandel 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischersteg-02-Poelvenn-See-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischersteg-Poelvenn-See-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect composition. QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 04:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leegheide-nahe-Glabbacher-Bruch-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice landscape and clouds. QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 04:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glabbacher-Bruch-morgens-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 04:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infozentrum Krickenbecker Seen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glabbacher Bruch 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ronald Mc Donald Haus 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 22:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flootsmühle 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichtreflexe und Spiegelungen Krickenbecker Seen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GMC-3100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcen-Castle-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Zeche Zollverein Schacht 12 Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg

File:Zeche Zollverein Schacht 12 Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:45:477A:29F3:25F4:3229:3B1F:1EB7 18:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulptur-Schichtung-Grugapark-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick-ueber-Gruga-vom-Wasserfall-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus-Ruhrnatur-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akadamie-Mont-Cenis-Seitenansicht-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luftschutzbunker-Sodingen-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 20:09, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Peter-Paul-Herne-Sodingen-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Groote-Pleen-Landschaft-2015-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:27, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Groote-Pleen-Landschaft-2015-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:30, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Besucherzentrum-Buitenzentrum-De-Pelen-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Groote-Pleen-Landschaft-Meerbaansblaak-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Skulptur-Schichtung-Grugapark-2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skulptur-Schichtung-Grugapark-2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Groote-Pleen-Landschaft-2015-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silberpalais-Duisburg-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel-Arosa-Ruettenscheid-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)