Ueb-at

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ueb-at!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 15:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Ueb-at, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Grabdenkmal kaler von lonzenheim.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Grabdenkmal kaler von lonzenheim.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Grabdenkmal kaler von lonzenheim.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Das Foto mag ja von dir sein, aber das Foto im Foto, ist das auch von dir? Du brauchst auch dafür eine Berechtigung (OTRS Freigabe), Bezug auf alt (> 100 Jahre, Fotograph länger als 70 Jahre tot - danach schaut das Foto nicht aus), oder Berufung auf Panoramafreiheit. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality images

Hi, Ueb-at, ich habe zwei Bilder von dir als Quality images vorgeschlagen, eines bräuchte ev. Nachbearbeitung, falls du übereinstimmst und Lust hast. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirtschaftsgebaeude kellerstoeckl welten.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Saubere Arbeit. --Haeferl 23:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Bildkategorien

Lieber Ueb-at, in welcher Gemeinde steht denn dieses Haus? Bitte deinen schönen Fotos auch in die jeweilige Ortskategorie einfügen. Danke. lg --Eweht (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

klärung notwendig

Hallo Ueb-at, kannst du bitte klären, ob es sich bei File:Orstkapelle_gosdorf.JPG um die Ortskapelle oder die Wegkapelle (wo das Bild eingehängt ist) handelt? Ich verschiebe dann auf das eine (File:Ortskapelle Gosdorf.JPG) oder das andere. Danke & lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, HerziPinki! Wieder einmal richtig erkannt. Ist leider nicht die Wegkapelle sondern die Ortskapelle, ca. bei Hausnummer 30. Danke für´s nachschauen und auch für die Nominierungen! lg Ueb-at (talk) 16:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Ueb-at --Ueb-at

danke, habs nach File:Ortskapelle Misselsdorf.jpg verschoben. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Hinweis Upload Denkmallistenbilder

Hallo Ueb-at, der Upload von Bilder geht über die Denkmallisten aktuell mit dem neuen Upload Wizard. Es werden Beschreibungen, ID und Kategorie automatisch vorausgefüllt, du bekommst mehr Benutzerführung und mehr Hilfe bei der Kategorisierung. Magst mal ausprobieren? Außer du hast lokale Datein IMG4711 oder DCN4711 oder ähnliche (da gibt es aktuell ein Problem). lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

QI

die zwei gehören dir:

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock halbenrain west.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ortskapelle sulzbach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Feuerwehr hl.Florian 1998 oesterreichische post austria-lexikon.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Ueb-at, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 11:36, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Europaeisches Parlament .JPG

And also:

• File:Europäisches Parlament Nobelpreis.JPG

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 17:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Im Anschluss an unser Gespräch beim BDA

Hallo Ueb-at, nochmals die schriftliche Zusammenfassung. Darf ich dich bitten, dich an den von dir angelegten Kategorien zu versuchen. Ich schau dir auf die Finger und korrigiere. Als Beispiel vielleicht Category:Kath. Filialkirche hl. Georg (Eisenhüttl):

Kategorien zu den denkmalgeschützten Objekten sollten:

• auf Kategorieebene die objektbeschreibenden Kategorien haben, nicht auf Bildebene. D.h. im konkreten, dass die Kategorien

[[Category:Kukmirn]]
[[Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Kukmirn]]
[[Category:War memorials in Bezirk Güssing]]
[[Category:Churches in Bezirk Güssing]]
[[Category:Filial churches in Burgenland]]
[[Category:Saint George churches in Burgenland]]
[[Category:Churches in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Eisenstadt]]

von File:Kirche_eisenhuettl.JPG nach Category:Kath. Filialkirche hl. Georg (Eisenhüttl) zu verschieben wären.

• den Baustein {{Doo}} mit der BDA Id des Denkmals enthalten, konkret {{doo|28678}}. Die id findest du entweder in der Denkmalliste oder beim Bild, wo du die Kategorien herkopierst.
• eine {{Wikidata infobox}} enthalten, konkret {{wikidata infobox}}. Das macht Wunderdinge, wenn
• auf Wikidata die angelegte Commonscat verlinkt ist. Dazu musst du konkret auf Kath. Filialkirche hl. Georg (Q37943838) unter Andere Websites (ganz unten) den Namen der Kategorie eintragen, konkret Category:Kath. Filialkirche hl. Georg (Eisenhüttl) Die volle Pracht der Infobox entfaltet sich erst, wenn diese Verbindung hergestellt ist. Zu dem Objekt auf Wikidata kommst du am einfachsten über den link wikidata in der grauen Box mit der Denkmal-Id.

generell sind Kategorien Abstraktionen und Zusammenfassungen von gleichartigen Objekten, im Falle Commons, von Bildern zu einem Objekt. Gibt es nur ein Bild, so braucht es keine Kategorie. Aber wenn sie angelegt ist, bleibt sie halt.

Fragen bitte, lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki,

als erstes vielen Dank für deine Informationen. Habe es leider erst jetzt gelesen und muß es eingehend anschauen. Wenn ich darf melde ich mich zu einen späteren Zeitpunkt. lg Ueb-at (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

sicher darfst du dich jederzeit melden. Sonst melde ich mich halt.

Ich habe mir eben deinen Artikel de:Kirche Neuhaus in der Wart und die zugehörende Commonskategorie angesehen und erlaube mir folgende Anmerkungen.

• Der Denkmalschutz im Artikel und in der Commonscategory ist nicht belegt und nach de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Mischendorf auch nicht gegeben. Wenn du das Objekt nicht in der Denkmalliste der Gemeinde findest, gehe bitte davon aus, dass es auch nicht denkmalgeschützt ist.
• Bei der Commonscat habe ich Angaben zur Diözese, zum Patrozinium, zur geographischen Einordnung und zum Erbauungszeitpunkt ergänzt. [1]
• Einige deiner Innenansichten der Kirche waren mE klare Außenansichten, habe ich verschoben.
• Zum Artikel:
  • Artikel haben keine Überschriften im Artikeltext, sondern erben den Titel vom Lemma. D.h. ein Artikel fängt NIE mit einer Überschrift an.
  • ein Link geht genau umgekehrt, nicht [[Franziskaner|Franziskaner (OFM)]] sondern [[Franziskaner (OFM)|Franziskaner]], im konkreten Fall, wo der Antonius schon verlinkt ist, ist die Information allerdings redundant (=überflüssig), da sie im Artikel über den Antonius besser aufgehoben ist. Und dort schon steht.
  • Denkmalschutz habe ich entfernt.
  • Kategorie de:Kategorie:Neuhaus in der Wart existiert auf WP:de (der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia) nicht. Dann auch bitte nicht einfügen, Kategorien sollten generell erst angelegt werden, wenn ungefähr 10 Artikel vorhanden sind, ich glaube kaum, dass das bei dem Dorf jemals erreicht werden kann.
  • Koordinaten bitte immer auf der Karte überprüfen, immer die Objektkoordinaten (in diesem Fall der Kirche) und nie die Ortskoordinaten. Im Zweifelsfall eher weglassen.
  • Wenn es keine Einzelnachweise gibt, braucht es auch keine Überschrift.
  • Bilder (in der Galerie) sollten immer eine Beschreibung haben.
  • [2] habe noch 2 Kategorien entfernt, weder ist das Pfarrkirche, noch Baudenkmal (siehe Kategoriebeschreibung, Denkmalschutz ist Voraussetzung).

lg --13:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki, einfach toll was du dir für Arbeit mit mir machst. Super und perfekt! Vielen Dank. lg Ueb-at (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:USFA_License_plates_of_Austria

USFA License plates of Austria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

91.19.145.98 16:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Übersbacher-Zeitblick Fotobuch Stadtgemeinde Fürstenfeld.JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Übersbacher-Zeitblick Fotobuch Stadtgemeinde Fürstenfeld.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bilderband Chronik Freiwillige Feuerwehr Übersbach Ueb-at Zeitblick.pdf

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bilderband Chronik Freiwillige Feuerwehr Übersbach Ueb-at Zeitblick.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)