User talk:Uoaei1/Archive03

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich

... für Dein Engagement

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an infowikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über vereinwikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk)  14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC)  > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen fest

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, sind 18 Deiner Bilder: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Xanthoria parietina 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xanthoria parietina 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papaver orientale Seitenstetten 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama Süd 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Spechtensee gegen Westen 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spechtensee gegen Westen 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariazell von Gemeindealpe 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariazell von Gemeindealpe 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Menyanthes trifoliata Spechtensee 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Menyanthes trifoliata Spechtensee 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Bodenbauer Linde 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Kapschgasse Linde 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:08, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Bodenbauer Linde 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:48, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Kapschgasse Linde 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Bodenbauer Linde 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A 5:7 ratio might reduce the dominance of the sky --Cccefalon 03:50, 17 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Crop changed --Uoaei1 14:49, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Bodenbauer Linde 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Bodenbauer Linde 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Bodenbauer Linde 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:19, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Kapschgasse Linde 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Kapschgasse Linde 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama Ost 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama Ost 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brixner Dom Deckenfresko Anbetung 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brixner Dom Deckenfresko Anbetung 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lilium martagon mit Rutpela maculata 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lilium martagon mit Rutpela maculata 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Fresko Brotvermehrung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments User:99of9

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Fresko Geburt Christi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality why f/16? --Livioandronico2013 13:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Fresko Katzen und Mäuse.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dactylorhiza majalis Spechtensee 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dactylorhiza majalis Spechtensee 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresko Pfingstwunder 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresko Pfingstwunder 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schinaria Beach Panorama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schinaria Beach Panorama 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC) *  Comment Isn´t it a bit to dark at the rock formations? --Hubertl 09:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)  Done Brightened --Uoaei1 18:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Bernardi-Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Bernardi-Altar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Bernardi-Altar Madonna 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephansdom Barbarakapelle Gewölbe 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, minor CA, but OK for me --Isiwal 12:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)  Done CAs removed --Uoaei1 14:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephansdom Barbarakapelle Gewölbe 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There are some minor magenta CA left, but for QI its good. --Hubertl 10:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)  Done CAs removed --Uoaei1 14:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresko Langhaus Westfeld.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Johannishof 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Kolomanihof 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Fassade 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Kanzel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kapitelsaal 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Brunnenhaus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but good enough given the difficult conditions --DXR 09:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Nordflügel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check the top. Do the image need a correction or is it OK?--XRay 05:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)  Question What do you mean? For me it is ok. --Uoaei1 05:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment May be the top isn't horizontal. It looks tilted. But only the top. --XRay 06:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)  Done Corrected, thanks! --Uoaei1 06:38, 5 September 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now.--XRay 13:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresko Langhaus Ostfeld.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Kanzel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Hochaltar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg alter Kreuzgang Fenster 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Krypta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Veitskapelle Ossarium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Creepy. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Johannes-Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Epiphanie-Altar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kirche Kuppelfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Brunnenhaus 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Epiphanie-Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Michaels-Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Dein Bild der Domorgel St. Pölten

Hallo Uoaei, herzlichen Dank für die promotion meiner Bilder und Gratulation zu den Bildern des Tages! Aber bitte schau dir das Bild von der St. Pöltener Dom Orgel noch einmal kritisch an. Mir erscheint es schon sehr unscharf zu sein und es passt eigentlich nicht in deine QI-Sammlung. Die anderen reviewer sehen das vermutlich auch so, aber keiner will es rausschmeißen - ich auch nicht. LG --Isiwal (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

@Isiwal: Hallo, danke ebenfalls für deine offene Anmerkung. Magst recht haben, dass das Bild nicht sehr scharf ist, vielleicht durch die HDR-Bearbeitung (eigentlich sind es 5 Bilder im Bereich +/- 4 Blendenstufen. Ich lass es jedenfalls mal im Wettbewerb und schau, was rauskommt. Bei der Gelegenheit möchte ich dich gleich um deine Meinung bezüglich meiner FP-Nominierung Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 03.JPG fragen, die nicht so ankommt wie ich es mir erhofft hätte. Was meinst du, warum ist das so? Auch dieses Bild ist ein HDR mit dem gleichen Blendenbereich. LG --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, aus meiner Sicht ist das Bild der Bibliothek um nichts schlechter oder besser als das FP von der Göttweiger Orgel. Das ist vielleicht der Haken an der Geschichte: sie sind vom Motiv zu ähnlich - siehe Kommentar "Like so many other similar interiors here.." Zum Technischen: Beide sind an den Ecken etwas weich, was ein gutes Bild nicht unbedingt schlecht macht. Ich vermute, daß diese Randunschärfen vom Objektiv kommen und dagegen kann man eigentlich nichts machen außer mehrere Aufnahmen zwischen F8 und F11 und dann das beste Ergebnis nehmen. Ich habe das 18-105 auch im Kit mit der D7100 gekauft und war von Anfang an unglücklich damit. Das absolute Billigobjektiv 18-55 ist da bei 18mm besser. Mit HDRs kenne ich mich nicht aus, habe ich auch noch nie gemacht. Bei F8 und Änderung der Belichtungszeiten sollte von meinem Verständnis her eigentlich alles passen. Bei Änderung der Blende bei gleicher Zeit könnte es sein, daß einem die Schärfentiefe bei den weit offenen Blenden ausgeht. Aber soweit ich die Kommentare gelesen habe, ist die Schärfe eh kein Thema. Nachdem ich sonst nicht auf FP unterwegs bin, kann ich leider nicht für das Bild abstimmen. Mich hat schon einmal einer aufgeblattlt weil ich den Livio auf Grund seiner Info unterstützt habe. Aber ein paar Tage hast ja noch, das wird sich vermutlich eh ausgehen. Dafür ist die Barbarakapelle mit 19:0 durchgegangen wie nix! --Isiwal (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kirche Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kirche Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Bibliothek Fresko Nordkuppel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Nikolaus-Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Leopold-Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stephansdom Barbarakapelle Gewölbe 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stephansdom Barbarakapelle Gewölbe 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Gallitzinberg Rundtempel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg alter Kreuzgang 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kirche Hochaltar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semmeringbahn 20-Schilling-Blick 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Krypta 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kirche Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 11:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Krypta 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 11:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Deckenfresken 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kaiserstiege Deckenfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Nordflügel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 04:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Ost+Nordflügel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 04:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Marmorsaal Deckenfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Hofgarten 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kirche Kuppelfresko Drache 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Fearsome and QI for me.. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Deckenfresken 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Deckenfresken 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Prächtig! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Chorgestühl 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 16:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Hofgarten 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Deckenfresken 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kreuzgang 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice DoF in interesting structure --Daniel Case 04:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Hochaltar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Ritterkapelle 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Krypta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Hofgarten 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Gewölbe 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Abteistiege Deckenfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Taferl Basilika Langhausfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Marmorsaal Detail 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Gnadenbild 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Madonna 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Hochaltar 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Innenraum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Marmorsaal Deckenfresko 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Ritterkapelle Kapitell 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Zwettl Kapitelsaal 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Zwettl Kapitelsaal 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Orgel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Bronzeportal 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Josephs-Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Taferl Taferlstein 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Innenraum 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Fresko König Süd.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Verkündigung 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Nordwestseite 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Hofgarten 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Innenraum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Fresko Verkündigung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Kuefstein-Kenotaph 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Taferl Basilika Kuppelfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sonntagberg Basilika Deckenfresken 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sonntagberg Basilika Deckenfresken 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Westtrakt 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 04:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kreuzgang Hof 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Fresko Johannes der Täufer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Taferl Basilika Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One little issue (see my note) elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 05:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)  Done @Cccefalon: Corrected, thanks for review! --Uoaei1 07:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 08:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Hochaltarbild 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 08:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Boxler-Epitaph.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Heimsuchung 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Anbetung 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschach Ruine Wolkenstein 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Bibliothek 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschach Ruine Wolkenstein 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:59, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Altar 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Kanzel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Innenraum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Altar 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 17:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pürgg Johanneskapelle Innenraum 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pürgg Johanneskapelle Innenraum 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschach Ruine Wolkenstein 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Hochaltar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Orgel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good work. --Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Hochaltar 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Die Idee,

die Zusammenarbeit mit der Erzbischöflichen Diözese wg. einer Sondergenehmigung für Wikipedianer zu suchen (und anderer Diözesen), ist auf hohe Zustimmung gestoßen. Wir werden das im Herbst angehen. Wie genau ist noch unklar (ich tippe auf ein Empfehlungsschreiben an die jeweiligen Pfarreien). Wir kämpfen nämlich mit den Inhalten wegen WLM2016. Das wäre eine Möglichkeit. Danke für deine Promotion heute und den Hinweis. --Hubertl 05:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caltha palustris Spechtensee 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschach Ruine Wolkenstein 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Innenraum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonntagberg Basilika Deckenfresken 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Leiss-Epitaph.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menyanthes trifoliata Spechtensee 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschach Ruine Wolkenstein 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Turm 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Bibliothek Fresko Hauptkuppel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Südfront 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Hochaltar 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Altenburg Bibliothek Fresko Nordkuppel 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Altenburg Bibliothek Fresko Nordkuppel 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschach Ruine Wolkenstein 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Südseite 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschach Ruine Wolkenstein 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Fresko Johannes Evangelist.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Marmorsaal Deckenfresko 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Kirche Kanzel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Taferl Taferlstein.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hi Uoaei1. One question: Could you improve this image (WB, CA...)? Thanks! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

• @ArionEstar: Hi! Does not make much sense based on jpg without the raw image data. Regards, --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
  • What is raw image data? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
• @ArionEstar: I am surprised that you ask this. Well, almost all DSLR can be configured to store not only the jpg, but also the raw image file. The raw file represents the data directly from the sensor, while the jpg is adjusted by some settings like WB. The point is that in jpg each pixel is represented by 8 bits per color channel (256 x 256 x 256 colors), and that it furthermore uses a compression to reduce file size which looses some amount of information. On the other hand, raw data are much more accurate (my Nikon provides 14 bits per pixel and color channel, i.e. 16384 x 16384 x 16384 colors per pixel), and without lossful compression. So my point is: if you want to change something in your image like WB, this should be done on the accurate raw data, and not with the inaccurate jpg. When you change a jpg, you will loose even more information than in the original, and artefacts will soon be visible. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Pforte 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Prälatenhof 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Hochaltar 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Hochaltar 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Prälatenhof 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Fensterverdachung 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:01, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Ostseite 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:01, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschach Ruine Wolkenstein 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Organ 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Abteihof 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Krypta Deckenfresken 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Chorumgang Gewölbe 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Vaults 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Oxen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Turm 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semmeringbahn Ghega-Denkmal 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality, perharps slightly dark?--ArildV 08:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your review! --Uoaei1 19:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Altenburg Kirche Orgel 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Altenburg Kirche Orgel 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Oxen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semmeringbahn Weinzettelwand 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kaiserstiege Deckenfresko 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Ostflügel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Gestühl 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Christian Ferrer 04:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Fenster 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Despite the outblowing window on the upper left. Acceptable for QI --Hubertl 12:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Kapitell 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtenseehütte Wegweiser 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe a bit harsh in the shadow --Hubertl 10:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Nordseite 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Seitenstetten Hofgarten 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Gargoyles 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primula denticulata Spechtensee 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Turm 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laon Cathedral Organ 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laon Cathedral Organ 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee Wörschachbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Kanzel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Prälatenhof 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Innenraum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Kapitell 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Stained Glass Window South Aisle 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC) Comment 1888, "gothic"? Please look below left and right (MDCCCLXXXVIII). A good imitation...--Jebulon 18:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral in Fog 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Gestühl 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:21, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Ostseite 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Stained Glass Window Central Aisle 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Exhilarating. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Stained Glass Window North Aisle 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Krypta 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Westfassade 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It´s a bit better now, QI standard. --Hubertl 18:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Innenraum 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Stained Glass Window Central Aisle 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Stained Glass Window Central Aisle 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Kirche Westfassade 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Nordseite 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Ostflügel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral North Rose Window 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Interior 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semmeringbahn 20-Schilling-Blick 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Altenburg Krypta 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Ostseite 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Altenburg Kirche Kuppelfresko 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Altenburg Kirche Kuppelfresko 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Gratulation!

... fürs Mitmachen!

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich - und herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Foto File:Stephansdom Barbarakapelle Gewölbe 01.JPG hat Platz 2 gewonnen und deine Fotos File:Semmeringbahn 20-Schilling-Blick 01.JPG, File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Brunnenhaus 02.JPG, File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Brunnenhaus 03.JPG, File:Stift Seitenstetten Marmorsaal Deckenfresko 02.JPG, File:St. Pölten Dom Innenraum 01.JPG und File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Fenster 01.JPG gehören zu den 40 Fotos, die ex aequo Platz 11 belegen. Insgesamt wurden dieses Jahr 7757 Fotos eingereicht. Die Liste der Preisträger findest du hier: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/2015/11/04/gewinner-wiki-loves-monuments-2015-oesterreich/.

Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn du persönlich an der Preisverleihung teilnehmen kannst, die am 9. Dezember 2015 um 17 Uhr in der Wiener Hofburg stattfindet. Wir werden dich diesbezüglich noch per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral East Rose Window 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Interior 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Sebastians-Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Stiege 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Westfassade 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Gestühl 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Chorgestühl 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Hochaltar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral West Facade Night 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Hof 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Unterer Einstützenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Stiege 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Cloister 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Hof 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality, though maybe a bit satured/contrasted --Christian Ferrer 06:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Nordflügel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Hof 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Cloister 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Northeast Tower 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Hochaltarbild 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Necessarium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Chorumgang 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Cloister 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I know... --Hubertl 09:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Northeast Tower 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Southeast Tower 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee Kreuz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Brunnenhaus 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Porte d'Ardon 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral View from Tower 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Northwest Tower 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral East Towers 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral View from Gallery 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Maria Schnee Panorama 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Hof 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Ostseite 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee gegen Nordwesten 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Southwest Tower 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Seitenstetten Marmorsaal Deckenfresko 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Seitenstetten Marmorsaal Deckenfresko 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Southeast Tower 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee gegen Nordwesten 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Tremmelberg NW-Panorama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral West Facade Blue Hour 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Southwest Tower Top Vault 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs at lower and upper right. --Ajepbah 06:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)  Done CAs cleaned, thanks for review! --Uoaei1 08:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now --Ajepbah 19:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kirche Nordseite 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Bodenbauer Linde 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Like spellbound. --Johann Jaritz 07:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleinalpe von Seckau Sonnwenddorf 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful landscape. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Main Portal (Night) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Left Side Portal (Night) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Dürnberg Oberer Wölzer 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral East Towers 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Lantern Tower 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Portals (Night) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Right Side Portal (Night) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Oxen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Interior 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Altenburg Kirche Innenraum 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Altenburg Kirche Innenraum 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laon Cathedral Interior 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Tremmelberg O-Panorama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not so fond of huge panoramas but nevertheless I'm sure this is QI --Moroder 10:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Vaults 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Leicht verzogen. --Hubertl 23:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)  Info The vaults are distorted in reality - check other images in the same category. --Uoaei1 07:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)*  Comment man kann sich auch auf nichts verlassen mehr, heutzutage! *gg* --Hubertl 12:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Choir Screen South 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Choir Screen North 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Choir Screen North 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Choir Screen North 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Portail du Jugement Dernier Trumeau 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Portail de la Vierge Trumeau 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Portail du Jugement Dernier Tympanon 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Portail de la Vierge Ébrasement 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South Transept 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Southeast View 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. If you clear the perspective problems, it should be FP. --Hubertl 07:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC) @Hubertl: Which perspective problems? Pls. give me a hint! --Uoaei1 07:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC) see note. --Hubertl 07:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South Tower 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South View 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame East View 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Seitenstetten Abteistiege Deckenfresko 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Seitenstetten Abteistiege Deckenfresko 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame East View 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South Transept 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Towers Southeast View 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ of Cathédrale Notre-Dame, Laon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:38, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ of Altenburg Abbey Church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome fresco in Altenburg Abbey Church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winged altar in Maria Laach am Jauerling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Altenburg Abbey Church, viewing eastwards to the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame East View 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South Tower 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South View 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Portail du Jugement Dernier 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laon Cathedral Interior 04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laon Cathedral Interior 04.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South Transept 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Portail Sainte Anne 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Portail du Jugement Dernier 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Portail de la Vierge 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Apse Windows 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Paris Notre-Dame Southeast View 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris Notre-Dame Southeast View 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Sainte Chapelle East View 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Palais de Justice Gate 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Prettige feestdagen en een gezond 2016. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame Southeast View 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Sainte Chapelle East View 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Palais de Justice Gate 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcissus poeticus Spechtensee 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Brunnenhaus 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Brunnenhaus 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Maria Laach Kirche Gnadenbild 01.JPG

Hi, I tried some adjustments: File:Maria Laach Kirche Gnadenbild.jpg. Of course, doing it from the original RAW would be better. I also think that the bright spots should be retouched to be FP. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

I imported a corrected version. Don't worry, I won't overload your version. ;o)

These defects are weird. They look like what we can find on old argentic prints. IMHO, they are distractive enough to require a restoration. Anyway, I think that we can have 2 versions. Happy New Year! Regards, Yann (talk) 22:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Yann: Hi! I disagree, as in my opinion it is not the task of the photographer to decide about restauration of a painting. However, we can leave the two versions as they are. Regards and Happy New Year also to you! --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Gnadenbild

bei der Antwort zu Yann fehlt meiner Meinung nach ein "not"... Ich bin im Übrigen auch der Meinung, dass man ein Bild nicht retuschieren sollte. Ws anderes ist bei Rahmen, diese haben in den seltensten Fällen etwas mit dem Original zu tun. Da kann man schon mal. So wie ich es bei Egger-Lienz, „die Namenlosen“, gemacht habe. --Hubertl 19:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Narcissus poeticus Spechtensee 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Narcissus poeticus Spechtensee 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)