Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wernervc!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:43, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:18, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Please experiment in the sandbox edit

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  Frysk  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−
  
An edit you made seemed to be a test, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Feel free to visit the community portal if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thank you!

Trijnsteltalk 18:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Flanders Field American Cemetery (Waregem) 5.JPG edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flanders Field American Cemetery (Waregem) 5.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

High Contrast (talk) 16:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:St. Symphorien .JPG edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:St. Symphorien .JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 21:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Adinkerke_Churchyard_Extension edit

 

Adinkerke Churchyard Extension has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Maxx (talk) 18:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Categories of places edit

Hello, nice pictures of Commonwealth cemeteries. Could you be so kind to put categories of places to your categories of cemeteries? --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, mijn excuus voor het late antwoord. Wat bedoelt u precies met uw vraag? Kan het dat u graag een plaatsbepaling bij de foto's ziet?
groetjes Wernervc (talk) 18:41, 2 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Neermeerskaai 2 1.JPG edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Neermeerskaai 2 1.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Rozier 3 1.JPG edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rozier 3 1.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 22:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
Wat een prachtige foto's zie ik vaak van je voorbijkomen. Puik werk! Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hallo Sjoerddebruin, bedankt voor de ster. Het sterkt mij in de betrachting om goede foto's te maken. Groetjes van Wernervc. --Wernervc (talk) 20:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Maroc_British_Cemetery,_Grenay edit

 

Category:Maroc_British_Cemetery,_Grenay has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

parent categorie edit

Dag Wernerve, het is niet de bedoeling naast een categorie ook nog de betreffende parent categorie te zetten: Category:World War I cemeteries of germans in France heeft als parent Category:German war graves in France, dus die categorie wordt niet meer toegevoegd. groet--Havang(nl) (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK. --Wernervc (talk) 15:48, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Foto's Frankrijk 21 juli-21 sept edit

Dag Wernervc, ken je de foto-campagne L'été des villes al? Je kunt bij je foto's uit Frankrijk, geupload tussen 21 juli en 21 sept 2015, het sjabloon {{L'été des villes}} plaatsen en dan worden die foto's toegevoegd aan de campagnepagina en de bijbehorende categorieën. Voor nieuwe fotos kun je de uploadwizard van de campagne gebruiken, die geeft automatisch het sjabloon bij de foto. Groeten --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

no FOP in Belgium edit

Hi Wernervc, do you know the sculptor of the statue shown in File:Romain Deconinck 1-2.JPG? To me, it looks to be rather recent. Contrary to The Netherlands, Belgium has no Freedom_of_panorama exception for public works. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Romain Deconinck 1-2.JPG edit

 
File:Romain Deconinck 1-2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

The picture is deleted. --Wernervc (talk) 08:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi! edit

You don't know but I just find a tiny mistake in a coordinate location on wikidata. I noticed that you're probably Belgian and I guess with the freedom of panorama now you have a lot to do.

I am preparing a tool about requested image and I wanted to ask which tool are you using now to find missing images? I like to share expertise with people, so I can make better tool. I've studied the topic for months so I can tell you later all i know if it helps.--Alexmar983 (talk) 00:07, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Image uses edit

Hello. I have used several of your pictures of CWGC headstones in some articles and wanted to let you know and thank you for the photographs. File:Ypres Reservoir Cemetery-13 (cropped).JPG (Francis Aylmer Maxwell), File:Sanctuary Wood Cemetery -12.JPG (Gilbert Talbot), and File:Voormezeele Enclosure n°3-12.JPG (George Llewelyn Davies). Did you know that these people had Wikipedia articles at the time you took the photos, or was it just chance? I hope there will be others as well. I will try and keep track of the additions I make. Carcharoth (talk) 13:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm glad you want to use my pictures. When you look in the category: Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemeteries in Belgium (or France), you will find many pictures that are created by me and that might be useful for you. Kind regards. --Wernervc (talk) 14:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Grindbakken-Dok Noord 8.JPG edit

 
File:Grindbakken-Dok Noord 8.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Gent - Wolweverskapel 17-3-2017 16-05-01-2-2.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gent - Wolweverskapel 17-3-2017 16-05-01-2-2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Gentbrugge Communal Cemetery-1.jpg edit

De "communal cemetery" is een kerkhof bij deze kerk. Ik zie een afbeelding van de kerk, van de begraafplaats is niets te zien. Henxter (talk) 08:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

OK. Is verwijderd en staat bij Sint-Simon en Judaskerk (Gentbrugge). --Wernervc (talk) 13:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Bucquoy-road-cemetery-01-3.jpg edit

 
File:Bucquoy-road-cemetery-01-3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 21:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Household Cavalry Memorial, Zandvoorde edit

Hello. Thank you again for all your photos of war graves and memorials in Belgium and France. If you are able to go to Zandvoorde again, would it be possible to photograph the Household Cavalry Memorial? Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, if I am in the vicinity of Zandvoorde again (if the weather is better) I will make some pictures of this Memorial for you. Greetings --Wernervc (talk) 12:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image use on a blog edit

Hello, I would like to use the image of Joseph Kaeble's gravestone (File:Wanquetin Communal Cemetery Extension-12.jpg) for the Victoria Cross blog series on the Library and Archives Canada blog. I want to make sure that I give you the proper attribution for the use of this image. Can you let me know how you would like to be attributed? You can reach me either on my talk page Ouvrard or by email: bac.blogue-blog.lac@canada.ca

hello, you can use the image (File: Wanquetin Communal Cemetery Extension-12.jpg) free. --Wernervc (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you! Ouvrard (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi,done with pleasure, thank you for the gift. --Wernervc (talk) 21:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

uncategorized images edit

Hi Wernervc, I've stumbled across some of your images when categorizing Category:All media needing categories as of 2016 and it seems that you are / have been using removal of categories as a strategy to select images for categories while not selecting quite similar ones. [1], [2]. Now, every image should be categorized and by removing all categories, you are creating a race condition with other commonists. I have put back the two similar images to the appropriate categories. What are your possibilities to get rid of the images you do not want?

  • Upload a better version on top of the old image, instead of creating it twice (preferred possibility, but too late in current cases)
  • Once you have uploaded quite similar images twice:
    • request deletion as the uploader (but there is no guarantee, and not after a long time)
    • request deletion as {{Duplicate}}
    • request a merge (never tried this), will result in the same situation as when uploading a new version
    • put {{Superseded}} to the image you do not want
    • create a subcategory of the category in question and move unwanted images there (I use this only for really bad images)

Uncategorization is not an option. In the end, it is the one who uses your images who will select the appropriate one. See your 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 uncategorized images (~140). best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your photo used without attribution edit

https://www.brusselstimes.com/hidden-belgium/508907/hidden-belgium-the-grave-of-peter-pan 2A02:2788:1038:281:D5E3:C87B:6BAB:25DB 11:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply