Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Даша Астафьева & NIKITA.jpg
[[:]], not featured
edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2013 at 14:03:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by mamamusic company - uploaded by Glooi - nominated by Алый Король -- Алый Король (talk) 14:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Алый Король (talk) 14:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Oppose noisy, overexposed faces and why BW? The world is colorful. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2013 (UTC)- Support Great!Trongphu (talk) 22:25, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Too noisy and artificial. --A.Savin 09:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support nice EV, we should have more pictures like this. Tomer T (talk) 11:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per A.Savin --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support I like the composition and lighting, and even the grain, it's not so annoying! Colour would be also nice, but imo it's a good BW. It's nice to have studio shots of bands. --Kadellar (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Nice --Claus (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support It's supposed to be artificial, it's a musical "act". And per Kadellar. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 02:10, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose imho noise level is too high. --Ivar (talk) 07:44, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Perhaps the grain you are worried about is digital noise but this is just the sort of beautiful black and white grain quality I would have been very happy to produce for clients in a large enlargement, on 20" x 30" or 20" x 24" bromide print, taken on Ilford HP4 or 5, or maybe even Kodak Tri-X, as I used to make as pro 25+ years ago. There are a few spots, probably dust spots, down near the bottom of the legs that need retouching. As a studio band shot, it's very good. Ww2censor (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC) (talk) 21:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
