Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Храм Смоленской иконы Пресвятой Богородицы в Новогорбово ворота.jpg

File:Храм Смоленской иконы Пресвятой Богородицы в Новогорбово ворота.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2021 at 23:30:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Russia
Info created by Alexander Artyomenkov - uploaded by Niklitov - nominated by Niklitov -- Niklitov (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Niklitov (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, perspective needs correction, and I doubt that can be done without compromising the image's featurability. Daniel Case (talk) 15:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The perspective distortion is part of the composition here, not a mistake that would need correction. --Kreuz schnabel 17:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A perspective shot like this one needs to be symmetric to convey its idea. Crop suggestion added. Overall surprisingly low quality – why 400 ISO? And what’s the distracting shiny object on the left edge? Pity the main gate’s right wing is partly covering the building behind. --Kreuz schnabel 18:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done (crop) Thanks! — Niklitov (talk) 20:16, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the talent of the photographer is being judged here, not only the perfection of the apparatus, right? — Niklitov (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No, what's judged here is the greatness or lack of greatness of the photo. Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What’s judged here is the "outstandingness" of the resulting image (or, as Ikan put it, the "greatness"). While both a talented photographer and a good gear are useful things to take a great image, they are not really taken into account. It would be hard for a beginner with a cheap phonecam to get his photo featured here but it’s not impossible – given the greatness of the image will make up for its shortcomings on the technical side. – This here image is skilfully composed and has a good idea IMHO, there’s just a lack of sharpness and the unfortunate right wing of the gate :-/ --Kreuz schnabel 15:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

moral support It has some minor weaknesses, but it is photographically interesting. A very welcome diversion from what we're used to see here. --El Grafo (talk) 08:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The distortion is not convincing me. --Milseburg (talk) 18:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose distortion --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]