Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0203.jpg

File:15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0203.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2016 at 05:39:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Pirámide del Sol en Teotihuacán, Mexico - all by --Ralf Roleček 05:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ralf Roleček 05:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In my experience (a week later, at that!), this is a really hard structure to photograph well when you're that close to it. Marks for trying; I share your pain. Daniel Case (talk) 06:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 07:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unlike others, I haven't been there but I keep wanting to move the camera a bit to the left to get the stairs at the far right and see the full slope of the pyramid on the left side. The light also makes the surface a bit uninteresting. Guess Daniel is right. w.carter-Talk 08:58, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. I’d at least like to see one side of it entirely to the ground. Has this been stitched of two exposures? There’s a funny foreground center blurring suggesting this. Something seems to have gone wrong with the focus as well, since most parts of the pyramid are less sharp than the foreground grass, and the rightmost fifth is really blurry. --Kreuzschnabel 10:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- it is original from the Kamera without crop or stitching. --Ralf Roleček 11:48, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dann hat die Optik ein Problem mit unten mitte. Erinnert an ein Planlagenproblem zu Diafilmzeiten, aber ich hoffe mal nicht, daß dein Sensor da eine Delle hat :-) --Kreuzschnabel 14:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - oder ein Fettfinger... Das Objektiv war erst kürzlich zur Wartung bei Nikon und es gab keine Beanstandungen. --Ralf Roleček 15:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 20:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]