Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7673.jpg
File:16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7673.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2017 at 21:44:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
- Info Western Wall of the Temple Mount, Jerusalem - all by -- Ralf Roleček 21:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Ralf Roleček 21:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Nitpicks like the noisy upper edges aside, I'm sadly not wowed by it enough. It's a decent photo though. I just feel like a different camera position and composition would have emphasized the specialty of the wall better. – LucasT 22:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Even if it lacks the drama associated to this place, it is a pretty good description picture. The details on the wall are interesting, and even the people give a sense of the place, in a more mundane manner. The photo teaches. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support per Tomas --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I haven't decided how or even whether to vote on this photo, but in some ways, I prefer several of your other photos of the Kotel to this one: File:16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7689.jpg has a satisfying near-rectilinearity as compared to this one's slant, and I like the motion of the men walking toward the wall; File:16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7691.jpg, which concentrates on the women's section, shows the pitchers for the blessing on washing, putting the wall in a different context, though there's a dust spot that should be cleaned toward the right above the wall; File:16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7690.jpg shows men praying and touching the wall from an appealing angle. None of the photos are perfect and all can be critiqued, but all are good and different. However, compared to the others, I can't think of anything that strikes me about this one as special. So that's likely to result in either a non-vote or a mild oppose vote from me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lucas. lNeverCry 08:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lucas. --Karelj (talk) 23:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lucas; a very static image. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It is not a bad raw material for a great photo. I think that a crop would give it a much more forceful look, the angle and the wide floor makes it a bit touristy. See note. I downloaded it and tried it, it came out very nice. Try it. Anyone else agree? --cart-Talk 20:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. Good eye. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, not for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Why not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, not for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. Good eye. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per my own remarks above and others' remarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results: