Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2010 0515 rama 4 and sathorn 22a.JPG

File:2010 0515 rama 4 and sathorn 22a.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2012 at 16:55:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Takeaway - uploaded by Takeaway - nominated by Claritas -- Claritas (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- very difficult shot - in the middle of a conflict situation, and although the technical quality isn't great, I think it's a really valuable photograph. Claritas (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 18:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Blurry scenery, bad composition of the background. Only the tire stands out. TrebleSeven (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's taken in rather difficult circumstances. Seeing as the main subject is sharp and stands out, I think we can forgive the blur on the left. The background is alright to me - this is a quality image. --Claritas (talk) 19:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality image doesn't always equal to a featured image. We cannot forget / forgive elements of an image with an FP. Not an Fp for me. Sorry. :) TrebleSeven (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I can understand where you're coming from. --Claritas (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd recommend nominating it at the English Wikipedia. You've got a better chance there. TrebleSeven (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do it for me if you think it stands a chance. I can't, 'cos I'm banned there. --Claritas (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question -- Sorry but the only "Rama" I know is the alien spaceship of Arthur Clarke SF novel. An explanation of the context in the image file would be welcome. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file description states that it's a street in bangkok. --Claritas (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Maybe it has chances to become a valued image (VI). -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 00:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's what it is already. TrebleSeven (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose 80% is missing. พ.s. 22:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose All in all it's not above average. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination - --Claritas (talk) 12:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]