Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Cape Verde. Sal. Hund Vid Färgad Dörr.jpg

File:2014 Cape Verde. Sal. Hund Vid Färgad Dörr.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2014 at 11:27:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by danielåhskarlsson - uploaded by danielåhskarlsson - nominated by danielåhskarlsson -- Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 11:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 11:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please review the categorization. There are a lot of red links and categories that seem far too specific ("street","dog"). I also suggest that you remove the correctable quality issues (like CA) first, otherwise the image is likely to have a tough time here. I would also be interested to know if the light on the dog is natural or was added in post-production. --DXR (talk) 11:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
CommentThanks for write. I have now removed some categorization. But don't understand the CA and quality issues? Please explain more. The light ON the do is natural but I have added "darkness" to the area around the dog. Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, CA is the colorful outline that is caused by imperfections of lenses. You can e.g. see it at the sign that says "No entry under 18", where black lines are surrounded by color that wasn't really there (you can read more here). This is usually easily removed by software and that's why it is usually expected that it is no longer there in FP candidates. --DXR (talk) 12:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank again for your time =) The photo was taken free hand, with a tripod the picture will got more sharpen ofc. But I think this new version I upload is much more sharp and clean. But please give more opinions! Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very artistic. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. The composition is nice, but I don't like the darkening around the dog. At least, I don't like the way it's so obviously darkened. It appears as a halo around the dog, rather than a gradual vignette. Diliff (talk) 11:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per "Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer". We expect documentary standards for non-studio shots. In addition to the fake vignette, there's just too much overall manipulation of levels/contrast/saturation. If the islands have colour doors and walls, then show that faithfully, rather than crank the knobs up till my retina's complain :-). -- Colin (talk) 11:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 14:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]