Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:4 Cilindros, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 04.JPG

File:4 Cilindros, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 04.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2013 at 15:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Unusual perspective of the BMW Tower (known as "4 Cylinders"), host of the BMW Group headquarters, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support An interesting architectural image. There is slight distortion of the horizontal panels and facade band near the bottom of the image but I think it is acceptable. Ww2censor (talk) 21:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I made some improvements in the perspective and chose a new crop Poco a poco (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not as interesting as your previous FP. J Kadavoor J e e 06:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's more interesting. Tomer T (talk) 08:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice perspective. --Selbymay (talk) 08:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice perspective and interesting --The Photographer (talk) 14:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ... and well done.--Jebulon (talk) 17:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately it is difficult to identify the building in question so I find the educational value of a nondescript building hard to warrant a FP, while the sky is a bit too flat. No wow here. —Mono 19:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agrees with Jkadavoor and Mono. It's very hard to recognize. --관인생략 (talk) 14:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As other opponents. --Karelj (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 19:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--JT Curses (talk) 15:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose One doesn't learn much about the building, it's too disjointed from the whole, and the image looks monotone. Hekerui (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the symmetry. The other FP might be more encyclopaedic but this one has a more original composition. It also serves to explain the vanishing point. --Kadellar (talk) 21:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition; well done overall. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture