Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A cameleer with his traditionally decorated camel. Cairo, Egypt, North Africa.jpg

File:A cameleer with his traditionally decorated camel. Cairo, Egypt, North Africa.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2013 at 11:00:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Mstyslav Chernov - uploaded by Mstyslav Chernov - nominated by Amada44 -- Amada44 ^{talk to me} 11:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amada44 ^{talk to me} 11:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please categorize the picture. it's a shame the camel is blurry. Pleclown (talk) 11:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I've added some categories. --El Grafo (talk) 12:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, the nose of the camel is not sharp, but imho this might even count as a plus: It adds some depth to the image and leads the viewer to the eye. It's hard to put into words, but I like this portrait very much. --El Grafo (talk) 12:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice. --Ralf Roleček 15:12, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow (though the camel nose could be sharper). -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice photo and a nice compositional idea, but I cannot make friends with protruding / frontal elements (nose) which are unsharp - even visible in thumbnail size. The unsharp nose is too prominent for staying in unsharpness. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tuxyso --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground blur. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, it's a nice image but the blurred nose is too much a a distraction for me.-Godot13 (talk) 00:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground blur, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others--Claus (talk) 08:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /J Kadavoor J e e 15:34, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]