Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abbaye Notre-Dame de Ré Île de Ré Charente-Maritime.jpg

File:Abbaye Notre-Dame de Ré Île de Ré Charente-Maritime.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2015 at 19:14:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nominationAbbey Notre-Dame de Ré, 14th.c., Ré Island, Charente-Maritime, France. -- Jebulon (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great light, although I think it's maybe a tiny little bit overexposed. But what really keeps me from supporting are (1) the lack of sharpness and (2) the guy with the hat in the middle (and maybe also the other guy next to him). Additionally, I think the blurry birds in the sky should be cloned out. --Code (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 05:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Medicore quality. Composition not so striking as it could be, and should be more central. Gray background, gray subject. On some stormy, rainy day this could be much more stunning. Category isn't correct. This are ruins → objects. --Mile (talk) 08:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- CommentThe "proposed category in nomination is not a mandatory", and I find this really boring (I'm polite), because almost never accurate neither relevant. Please Mile, I think you should oppose with this comment (be bold, no drama !)--Jebulon (talk) 09:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 12:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per PetarM. Daniel Case (talk) 15:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent for me -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per PetarM --Σπάρτακος (talk) 10:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately, light and composition don't elevate this above QI status in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈ 11:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I thank the supporters very much, but after thinking about, I'm afraid opposers have some good rationales, among them : sharpness not excellent, and color non optimum. Trusting the histogram, there is no overexposition however. Nice ruins, anyway...--Jebulon (talk) 19:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Jebulon You know what would suit you here (ironic yes) - fisheye, shot from inside, on dark stormy day. --Mile (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- aaaaargh 💥👹💣--Jebulon (talk) 20:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]