Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aeronave A-29 Super Tucano em voo sobre a Floresta Amazônica.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 02:13:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
Info created by Sgt. Johnson Barros (Brazilian Air Force) - uploaded by High Contrast - nominated by The Photographer -- The Photographer 02:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Support -- The Photographer 02:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Oppose the original version was a bit milky, but I think the current edit goes a bit too far in terms of contrast, the shadows on the ground are way too dark for my taste. Over-all, I've seen better air-to-air shots, this looks kind of cluttered to me. --El Grafo (talk) 12:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)- Weak Support. Good composition, very sharp, the ground perhaps a bit too dark. -- Spurzem (talk) 14:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose, as I agree that I've seen better air-to-air shots. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Gildir (talk) 05:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review, i takook notes about the problem fixing shadows, lights, color balance, noise in shadows, blacks, chromatic aberrations. Please Ikan Kekek, El Grafo and Daniel Case, take another look and tell me what do you think. Thanks --The Photographer 23:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Comment - I realize you're trying to address criticism of dark shadows, but it seems a little washed out to me now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- I fixed WB and I now look less washedout, let me know what do you think --The Photographer 00:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Much better than the previous version, but I think I like the version that was originally submitted best of these three. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Please, could you explain why?. I want see what problems can you see that are fixed on original version --The Photographer 22:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- The color and light look more natural to me in the originally-submitted version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek Thanks, I see, camera sensor change colors and the people see differents colors and it is more subjetive. Thanks for your review. --The Photographer 00:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, and I also might react differently to this version if I didn't have the other one to compare it to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- Please, could you explain why?. I want see what problems can you see that are fixed on original version --The Photographer 22:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Much better than the previous version, but I think I like the version that was originally submitted best of these three. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- @The Photographer: Better, but the background still gets in the way of making the planes stand out. Daniel Case (talk) 16:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
