Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amanita muscaria vliegenzwam 02.JPG
File:Amanita muscaria vliegenzwam 02.JPG, not featured
edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2012 at 17:28:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:44, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Stas1995 (talk) 10:31, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Support???!!! Very grainy and unsharp! Maybe downsample and check the results. --Gidip (talk) 11:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)- Oppose per Gidip --Florian Fuchs (talk) 11:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Gidip. JKadavoor Jee 11:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Need 50 edits to vote --Stas1995 (talk) 14:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Gidip. --Kadellar (talk) 21:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Penyulap ☏ 03:11, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Gidip -- JDP90 (talk) 05:04, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality. B.p. 08:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Smudged details and color fringing. But nice mushrooms. - Uberprutser (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Info created by Famberhorst - uploaded by nieuwe versie downsample
- Oppose This is a completely different picture, not a derivative work !!! (and the quality is not really better...)--Jebulon (talk) 18:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Comment Now, the previous version is back... Any way, my oppose vote remains...--Jebulon (talk) 18:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose For me, it doesn't have a "wow" factor. Michael Barera (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
