Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Angelo su una tomba del CImitero Monumentale di Milano, Italia.jpg

File:Angelo su una tomba del CImitero Monumentale di Milano, Italia.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2017 at 20:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info An angel spreads his wings on a tomb at Cimitero Monumentale in MIlan, Italy. Backlight, dark look, cemeterial feeling, created by Paolobon140 - uploaded by Paolobon140 - nominated by Paolobon140 -- Paolobon140 (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolobon140 (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The high level of chroma noise and lacking detail makes the quality below what's expected from an FP, IMO. I recommend first nominating your images at QIC to see if they are described as good.--Peulle (talk) 20:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Paulle, as i already did, i suggest you to calibrate your professional Apple monitor better so that you will be able to appreciate your traffic lights pics even more. A good techincian costs little money.Paolobon140 (talk) 20:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I reviewed this image on a brand new Macbook Pro, which was pre-checked by a professional technician before handed out to me at work. There is nothing wrong with the monitor. As for the traffic light photos, those were an effort to contribute some public domain photos to Commons, and most of them are not very good.--Peulle (talk) 08:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Peulle -- Prismo345 (talk) 20:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition --Cvmontuy (talk) 21:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do like the light on the face and arm. But Peulle is right: the chroma noise is awful and the shadow parts of the picture quite posterised and lacking tonal detail. These both indicate to me the image was under exposed and recovered in post, which you might have got away with on a new Sony or Nikon but the older Canon cameras are poor for that. Unlike luminance noise, chroma noise doesn't disappear much even if I downsize the image a bit, and unlike film grain, chroma noise has no appealing aspects. As an aside, wrt "over sharpening" discussion elsewhere, I do see some oversharpening here, which a clear white pixel halo to the high-contrast edge with the sky. -- Colin (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, and I also don't really understand why you chose that particular orientation and those particular crops. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* Becasue i like that particular orientation and those particular crops, it is quite evident:-)Paolobon140 (talk) 16:44, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clear but non-explanatory. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose Too dark generally, the color noise, the oversharpening noted by Colin and the awkward crop. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shadows are too strong --Michielverbeek (talk) 15:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While I do get the angle and crop, I mean it's the same representation that Stan Lee came up with in the 1940s and it's been a template for hero shots of all super heroes ever since (you can almost see Hawkman in this), it would need a more dramatic lighting to work here. There are also the technical issues noted by others. Nice try though! I'd love to see someone recreate the extreme angles and light from Sin City: A Dame to Kill For or any of Frank Miller's books. --cart-Talk 22:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- agree with Daniel HalfGig talk 23:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]