Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Antoine-François Callet - Louis XVI, roi de France et de Navarre (1754-1793), revêtu du grand costume royal en 1779 - Google Art Project.jpg

File:Antoine-François Callet - Louis XVI, roi de France et de Navarre (1754-1793), revêtu du grand costume royal en 1779 - Google Art Project.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2020 at 00:03:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
Info Portrait of Louis XVI, King of France & Navarre, in coronation robes - created by Antoine-Françoise Callet - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Alsakan -- Alsakan (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This Versailles painting is by far one of the best historical examples of French coronation portraits as well as the one with the highest quality we have on here -- Alsakan (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support VarunSoon (talk) 06:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 6th edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. --Cart (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Paris 16 (talk) 00:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - But it's either not an impressive painting or the reproduction doesn't capture what's great about it, so I'm thinking VI (for which this should be nominated, regardless of the results here). However, I'll cross out this opposing vote if there's an otherwise unanimous consensus to feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Hmm, I do like the painting and the quality is good overall, but there is a lot of visible JPEG artefacting in the darker areas. Cmao20 (talk) 14:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20: I'm not seeing it - could you annotate where? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: , they are visible across quite a lot of the painting but I have noted two areas where they are most prominent. It's not hugely noticeable which is why I voted neutral rather than oppose, but at 100% I can clearly see the blockiness that evidences too much JPEG compression. Cmao20 (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose very low resolution for a canvas of 278 cm (109.4 in); Width: 196 cm (77.1 in).--BevinKacon (talk)
Weak oppose per Bevin. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]