Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barclays Cycle Hire, St. Mary Axe, Aldgate.jpg

File:Barclays Cycle Hire, St. Mary Axe, Aldgate.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2012 at 16:54:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 16:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 16:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a quality problem: visible green CA Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've uploaded a new version. This is upgraded to us Lightroom4's process 2012 and removal of green/purple CA. Colin (talk) 20:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose...because of lack in quality for a standing motif. --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support In order to concentrate on the shapes and patterns rather than detail I chose a wide aperture and focused on the first bicycle. The image is functional too, with the cycle hire sign, clear Barclays logos, and no distracting people. Colin (talk) 20:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition and choice of perspective. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting composition (per Colin); but the front of the first cycle is obscured , top of seats and some other parts are overexposed. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good idea but IMO wrong execution (f/2.8), this kind of pictures need a wider DoF. The CA problem got better, though --Poco a poco (talk) 11:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - nice advertisement for Barclays :-) Like the composition and achieved DoF. --Murdockcrc (talk) 14:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice try, but what is featurable about this picture? What does it illustrate? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the rhythm of the picture and the composition. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Žiga (talk) 06:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. And a bit too blurry at the point of focus (presumabely due to f2.8) --Taraxacum (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow ;-) Albertus teolog (talk) 08:00, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:03, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]