Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beachy Head and Lighthouse, East Sussex, England - April 2010 crop horizon corrected.jpg

File:Beachy Head and Lighthouse, East Sussex, England - April 2010 crop horizon corrected.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2011 at 10:28:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Papa Lima Whiskey - nominated by Claus
Support -- Claus (talk) 10:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is the centre image part that makes the wow. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow... --Chrumps (talk) 02:08, 12 February 2011 (UTC)\[reply]
Support Great composition and juxtaposition. - LeavXC (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is the first time I ever vote for feature image candidate. I'm glad I could pick such a good one to be my first vote. --Gaendalf (talk) 04:22, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

* Support nicely composed. CoolTV

no right to vote --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose flat --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose washed out colors. Not the best of a Diliff work. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like these ones pastel colours! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alchemist-hp and Carschten.--Snaevar (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition. - Benh (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good--Citron (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose under-saturated. W.S. 08:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice landscape, but per others.--Jebulon (talk) 09:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose interesting subject but it is under-exposed.. and a little bit wash-out colors. Ggia (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Under-saturated and cliffs overexposed. ---donald- (talk)
Support As other supporters. Maedin\^talk 12:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alt

Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment sky looks ccw tilt, should be corrected before I can support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
now corrected: rotation CW by 0.3. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not as whashed out as the previous version, but the saturation level leaves me undecided.--Snaevar (talk) 14:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks a tad oversaturated to me and the cropped version is far better in composition IMO - Benh (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Can one experience such intense colours on that island?... -- KlausFoehl (talk) 09:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Benh.--Jebulon (talk) 09:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose seems over-saturated and dark. Ggia (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Benh.--shizhao (talk) 12:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]