Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berliner Platz Mülheim 2014.jpg
File:Berliner Platz Mülheim 2014.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2014 at 18:29:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 18:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)- Support I love the spacey effects created by the curving contrails. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Thanks a lot, Tomer T for the nomination. This photo was one of my first more serious attempts of using a nodal point adapter for documenting public squares. In de-wp some users dislike such shots due to the extreme angle of view (nearly 360° in the case here). In think such shots are quite valuable from an encyclopedic view and look pleasing at the same time due to the high level of detail. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico talk 20:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose -- sorry but this does not look good from that angle and it looks like multiple photos put together. Dman41689 (talk) 06:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)- Oppose This kind of panoramic views doesn't work without panoramic viewing software. Maybe there will be someday an open source 3D viewer in the Wikipedia, enough money is imho available for such a development... -- Smial (talk) 13:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I Agree with the opposers.--Jebulon (talk) 22:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm forced to agree with the opposers, but wow, the sharpness on this is incredible. I wish all FP and QI had this level of technical quality. -- Ram-Man 02:24, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
