Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boyd's forest dragon (Lophosaurus boydii) Daintree 2.jpg

File:Boyd's forest dragon (Lophosaurus boydii) Daintree 2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2024 at 18:15:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
Info Here is the whole of the same dragon. No FPs of genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why not the whole dragon?--Ermell (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that this shows so much more detail that people would prefer it. 20:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Support JukoFF (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Category is a red link -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I miss the tail. an important body part when climbing.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Compared to the the photo of the whole, I appreciate more the first proposed one. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both photos are good in their different ways, but from a purely photographic/compo standpoint, this one is much better. We have 1/2 and 3/4 photos of people, why can't we have the same of animals? Sometimes long tails (or other long parts of animals) are not important for a good frame of the animal. --Cart (talk) 10:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support [Edit: I forgot to sign.] --Thi (talk) 22:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Again, please Thi, you must sign your vote to make it valid.~~ Thank you. --Cart (talk) 12:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose in favour of the alt Cmao20 (talk) 02:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Alt image fits better --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version edit

Info version of the whole reptile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 16:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 20:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I disagree with Cart here, from a purely photographic/composition standpoint this one is better too. I love seeing the lizard in the context of its surroundings, the bokeh is really nice, and I like that we have some space on the left hand side of the tree trunk. Plus it just looks a little strange IMO to see a lizard without its tail. Cmao20 (talk) 02:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cluttered background but it's nice to see the long tail, and the way the animal climbs up on this trunk. Ideally a stitched photo with multiple frames showing the same resolution as the picture above and the tail would have been fantastic. Next time? :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been possible in theory as the dragon remained motionless for several minutes, thinking that it was hidden. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 18:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As the tail is very long, it is useful to include it. Good image --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Comment A bit of minor confusion, leading to an accidentally early closing of this. This resulted in Charles making his new nom in good faith, so he now has three active noms. Not his fault, so I think it's best to just let this slide. Correcting things would only result in more mess and confusion. --Cart (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strike this. I have now learned that it was indeed Charles who prompted this mess. My bad for making a good faiths comment. --Cart (talk) 13:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)

The chosen alternative is: File:Boyd's forest dragon (Lophosaurus boydii) Daintree.jpg