Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH.ZG.Zug View from Guggi 01 16x9+R 8192x4608 Br058 gp denoising Br075.jpg

File:CH.ZG.Zug View from Guggi 01 16x9+R 8192x4608 Br058 gp denoising Br075.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2023 at 07:55:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland
Info The old town of Zug (Switzerland) at blue hour. Created and uploaded by Roy Egloff, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful blue-hour photo; thanks to the snow it appears almost as in a fairy story. --Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As beautiful and still it looks as messy and ugly it's named.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The filename is not optimal, of course, but at least it is descriptive (starting with country code and canton code, it contains the name of the city and even the point of view). The extra stuff added at the end is indeed a bit irritating, but probably it’s useful for the creator (e.g. because he has a whole bunch of related files on disk and the filename helps to identify which one was uploaded). On Commons we usually respect the personal filename schemes of contributors as long as the filenames are unique, more or less descriptive, and don’t contain offensive stuff. Therefore I see no grounds to rename the file in accordance with the rather restrictive Commons file renaming policy (see Commons:File renaming). --Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I didn't claimed renaming the file. I just wanted to share my opinion on this odd contrast, but I fully respect the file CH.ZG.Zug View from Guggi 01,... and stuff.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 20:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Sorry if my reply sounded harsh! --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special atmosphere and appealing lighting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice! -- Ivar (talk) 12:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support All it needs is the stacks of money these people are saving in taxes . Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 17:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland