Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CVN-69-SPIE-training.jpg
File:CVN-69-SPIE-training.jpg, featured
editVoting period ends on 14 Feb 2009 at 09:10:06
- Info created by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Miguel Angel Contreras - uploaded by Durin - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality navy pic with heavy CA. Lycaon (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment That's odd, I use it as the desktop on my newly adjusted 24 inch LCD, and I can honestly say I haven't noticed any chromatic abberation. Could you point it out? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- On the nose and on the stern. On some airplanes wings near the nose but not really salient --Richard Bartz (talk) 02:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Question Is there anything that can be done about it? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 02:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- On the nose and on the stern. On some airplanes wings near the nose but not really salient --Richard Bartz (talk) 02:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment That's odd, I use it as the desktop on my newly adjusted 24 inch LCD, and I can honestly say I haven't noticed any chromatic abberation. Could you point it out? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support: Interesting! I think the quality is ok and I would not consider this as "heavy CA". --Siebengang (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Wow! I can't support because of the quality (focus is on helmet) and because of that tire. —kallerna™ 14:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Avala (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Usually I'm not too enthousiasdtic about all these U.S. military pix, buit this one gives me acute vertigo just by looking at it! -- MartinD (talk) 20:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Support. -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 21:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support-- Leon7 (talk) 04:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Winiar✉ 09:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Tiago Fioreze (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 05:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose--Kuvaly (talk) 13:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Might I have a reason? Is there something I can improve? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 02:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support I took my time supporting this picture. Mixed feelngs. I support it because it is an informative image taken from a rare point of view. It shows the power packed on a carrier, true military might... Perhaps some may not agree with the topic, but that is besides the point, power is power, and the image conveys it. On the technical side, I would wipe out the antenna at the right of the man, for it seems to connect the helicopter to the ship and it is a dsitracting element. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Info That's not an antenna...the the I in SPIE stands for 'Insertion', and the white line is a rope. If you look closely, you can see a man rappelling down to the ship. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 02:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Have to agree with MartinD. This one is impressive. --norro 14:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Wow!!! --Karel (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Mywood (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)