Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Calanque Sormiou Wikimedia Commons.jpg

File:Calanque Sormiou Wikimedia Commons.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2016 at 14:39:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info Calanque of Sormiou, France.
Info created by Benh - uploaded by Benh - nominated by Thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would be even better if there was a bit less shadow on the right but very good anyroad. --Kreuz schnabel 14:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 17:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The large portion in shadow ruins it for me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Because of the large portion in shadow, sorry, per King of Hearts. --Cayambe (talk) 06:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the shadow is very well-handled and helps create a left-right balance. But each to their own! -- Thennicke (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose shadow --Mile (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, unfortunately ;) I really went wrong with processing as well. - Benh (talk) 07:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - You have the right to withdraw the nomination as photographer, if you like. As I posted above, I like this photo, but I certainly wouldn't stand in your way (nor would I really have the right to do so) if you wanted to withdraw this nomination and nominate a photo you like better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the nomination but as per the opposers. Benh (talk) 08:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]