Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cast victim eruptions Pompeii.jpg

File:Cast victim eruptions Pompeii.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2015 at 18:46:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination--Jebulon (talk) 11:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive and moving close-up view of a cast of a victim of the Eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 in Pompeii, Italy.-- Jebulon (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'm sorry. I like the subject matter, but the whole photo is fuzzy except for part of the head. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I withdraw my nomination The level of reviews here is as low as the level of most of the pictures. My mistake to come back, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 11:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - Nice. I notice you didn't attempt to address my point, but instead slammed the entire site ad hominem. I don't claim to be a great photographer, though there certainly are some great ones on this site. I simply express my opinion based on what I see. And if you think the photos here are so bad, why did you want yours featured here? Feature it on another site whose photos you like better, or on your own. Good luck, and goodbye. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment Do not worry Ikan Kekek, it's normal here to cry and hurt when their photos are shaped correctly as this.LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Comment - It shouldn't be normal, in my opinion, and I find it anti-Wiki. I'm an admin on another Wiki site that doesn't have (or no longer has) a habit of tolerating high levels of invective between users. We found that tolerating a high level of anti-social behavior was chasing away some really valuable contributors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need patronizing lessons about what is "pro" or "anti-Wiki" here. And I don't "cry", I just withdraw. A picture can be bad, and reviews too. I experience that here for a while. Those who find that other wiki sites are better are welcome for a "good luck" and "good bye" too...--Jebulon (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were the one who said you were leaving, but I see you're still here... Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

not as nominator, only as reviewer.--Jebulon (talk) 12:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 08:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]