Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cataratas do Iguaçu - Parque Nacional do Iguaçu 3.jpg

File:Cataratas do Iguaçu - Parque Nacional do Iguaçu 3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2016 at 19:10:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded by ZECINTRA - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Incredibly, there are no Featured Pictures in Category:Iguazu Falls, and only 3 Quality Images. This is a beautiful and impressive picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's weird how bad it is in full-screen, shutter speed should be lower, he froze the water in a very harsh way. Impressive subject, the image.. eh, the colours, and all the rest are boring... -- RTA 20:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I came to the same conclusion as Ikan Kekek. Also, I love how the foliage is shown being blown by the mist. -- Ram-Man 21:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Christof46 (talk) 21:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Rodrigo. INeverCry 23:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It has wow, nice light and composition. I think the processing is quite bad though. It seems like a too big radius has been applied in a sharpening step, as can be seen on the fringing on the central vegetation at the top of the water fall, and then I think a too aggressive noise reduction has been applied, especially in the misty areas in the upper right section of the photo, which looks somewhat posterized/articifial painting-like. I would prefer more pixel noise instead. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per blown areas and posterization near bottom center of image noted by Rodrigo. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Weird processing. No longer looks like a photograph. -- Colin (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for all comments. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]