Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cobeta, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 19.jpg

File:Cobeta, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 19.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2016 at 03:03:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info General view of the municipality of Cobeta located in the province of Guadalajara, Castile-La Mancha, Spain. The population of Cobeta is (according to the 2004 census) 108 inhabitants. Note: this picture belongs to the project No municipality in Spain without a photograph. All by me, Poc o² 03:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 03:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate Support - You mean "No municipality in Spain without a photograph". I like the photo, but I wonder what it would have looked like if you had cropped to the right of the building that's cut off. Did you take any wider-angle photos? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sorry, Ikan, I meant without photograph, I corrected it. I've uploaded a new version with more image on both sides, but the building on the right is still cropped. I don't know whether I've another version of it. I have only a few RAW files with me. Poc o² 17:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support a bit oversaturated?! but enough wow. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral pending correction of that leaning tower on the left which has been noted.< Daniel Case (talk) 16:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC) Support now that that's been done. A landscape that confronts the viewer with what a Spanish winter is and isn't. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case: True, I've corrected it. Poc o² 17:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fine technique and light, but the composition is not at all FP level in my opinion. Especially the right hand side appears rather arbitrary with the cropped buildings and the electrical wires coming down in a distracting way. Wires can be OK if they add to the composition of a photo. In this case they do not for me. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 22:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Slaunger. INeverCry 22:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too ordinary composition for me, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Laitche, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 15:19, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Laitche, no wow.--Karelj (talk) 16:52, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 06:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]