Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.
The upper left is sagging a bit. Do you think you could adjust the perspective just a little bit so that the first row is as straight as the last? W.carter 19:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC) I tried, also I uploaded the RAW file if anyone wants to help to improve the picture. Regards!!! Ezarate 22:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Looks much better and less "saggy" now that you upped the light a bit. QI! W.carter 10:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Do you think you could denoise the sky a bit? W.carter 20:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 21:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! It wouldn't hurt to brighten everything but the sky a bit, but overall sharp and good composition so QI. W.carter 09:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
There is red/green CA almost all over the image, fixable but a lot of work. The image is also a bit dark. W.carter 19:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 22:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
CAs are gone, thank you :), but since you brightened the whole pic rather than just parts of the trees, you now have blown out branches, the whole building to the right and part of the monument are also whashed out in white. Try a middle way or just partial brightening. W.carter 10:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC) DoneEzarate 21:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! QI. W.carter 09:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Needs some perspective correction, the lamp post and store front are leaning out, and there is a lot of CA in several places. Think you can fix that? --W.carter 19:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 23:37, 21 August 2016 (UTC) * Comment this crop is bad, worse than the first one, the lamp post is not straight and has visible CAs too. No QI for me as it is. --Hubertl 01:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC
Agree. Don't know if you misunderstood, but Hubert1 is right. W.carter 07:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)) Done --Ezarate 18:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, storefront behind the front of the car is still leaning, you only did half the job. W.carter 20:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC) you´re right, done again Ezarate 20:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
I honestly can't see any change. Is the uploading system slow again? I made a note on the part that is still leaning, don't know if you can see it too? W.carter 10:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC) I tried again, it´s straight for me Ezarate 18:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Finally!! :D QI. W.carter 20:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment Bottom crop is a little tight but OK. Green chromatic aberrations should be removed. --Peulle 10:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 16:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Support Yep.--Peulle 19:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
It's a bit dirty. -- Spurzem 19:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Sorry but I can't solve that issue Ezarate 22:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
We need pictures of dirty cars as well as long as the photo is good. ;) But the picture needs some perspective adjustment, wall are leaning, and remove the CA. W.carter 10:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 00:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. --W.carter 09:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment The shadows are very dark and the image needs perspective correction. Minor CAs too. --XRay 06:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 23:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Support IMO OK now. --XRay 07:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
There is a bit of CA on the chrome and everything in the pic is tilted in some way. Think you could fix that? W.carter 10:48, 1 October 2016 (UTC) DoneEzarate 19:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Better, but still some CA left. See notes. W.carter 09:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 20:33, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 11:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Very good but, scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Please check your image. Noisy and too dark. --XRay 06:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 19:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Support Good quality. IMO OK now. --XRay 07:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Please check the wires. IMO they are meganta. IMO a problem with CAs. --XRay 05:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 23:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC) Support Good quality. --XRay 11:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!