Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.
The upper left is sagging a bit. Do you think you could adjust the perspective just a little bit so that the first row is as straight as the last? W.carter 19:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC) I tried, also I uploaded the RAW file if anyone wants to help to improve the picture. Regards!!! Ezarate 22:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Looks much better and less "saggy" now that you upped the light a bit. QI! W.carter 10:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Do you think you could denoise the sky a bit? W.carter 20:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 21:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! It wouldn't hurt to brighten everything but the sky a bit, but overall sharp and good composition so QI. W.carter 09:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
There is red/green CA almost all over the image, fixable but a lot of work. The image is also a bit dark. W.carter 19:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 22:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
CAs are gone, thank you :), but since you brightened the whole pic rather than just parts of the trees, you now have blown out branches, the whole building to the right and part of the monument are also whashed out in white. Try a middle way or just partial brightening. W.carter 10:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC) DoneEzarate 21:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! QI. W.carter 09:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Needs some perspective correction, the lamp post and store front are leaning out, and there is a lot of CA in several places. Think you can fix that? --W.carter 19:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 23:37, 21 August 2016 (UTC) * Comment this crop is bad, worse than the first one, the lamp post is not straight and has visible CAs too. No QI for me as it is. --Hubertl 01:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC
Agree. Don't know if you misunderstood, but Hubert1 is right. W.carter 07:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)) Done --Ezarate 18:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, storefront behind the front of the car is still leaning, you only did half the job. W.carter 20:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC) you´re right, done again Ezarate 20:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
I honestly can't see any change. Is the uploading system slow again? I made a note on the part that is still leaning, don't know if you can see it too? W.carter 10:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC) I tried again, it´s straight for me Ezarate 18:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Finally!! :D QI. W.carter 20:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment Bottom crop is a little tight but OK. Green chromatic aberrations should be removed. --Peulle 10:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 16:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Support Yep.--Peulle 19:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
It's a bit dirty. -- Spurzem 19:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Sorry but I can't solve that issue Ezarate 22:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
We need pictures of dirty cars as well as long as the photo is good. ;) But the picture needs some perspective adjustment, wall are leaning, and remove the CA. W.carter 10:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 00:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. --W.carter 09:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment The shadows are very dark and the image needs perspective correction. Minor CAs too. --XRay 06:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 23:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Support IMO OK now. --XRay 07:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
There is a bit of CA on the chrome and everything in the pic is tilted in some way. Think you could fix that? W.carter 10:48, 1 October 2016 (UTC) DoneEzarate 19:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Better, but still some CA left. See notes. W.carter 09:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 20:33, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 11:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Very good but, scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Please check your image. Noisy and too dark. --XRay 06:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 19:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Support Good quality. IMO OK now. --XRay 07:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Please check the wires. IMO they are meganta. IMO a problem with CAs. --XRay 05:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 23:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC) Support Good quality. --XRay 11:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Compelling facial expression, but way too much color noise, something like a newspaper photo. -- Ikan Kekek 06:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC) Reworked form RAW, @Ikan Kekek: --Ezarate 00:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Much less color noise, but unfortunately, now I'm seeing that some of the hair on the priest's head is a blown, posterized mass. Is that fixable? -- Ikan Kekek 08:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: now? --Ezarate 00:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The hair is much better, but I guess the tradeoff was to bring back a lot of the color noise. You've tried valiantly, but I doubt this can be turned into a QI. By all means try again if you like, though; I'll continue looking and hoping. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: NR applied Ezarate 02:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
OK, I think this is good enough for QI now. -- Ikan Kekek 10:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevskytalk 19:25, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ezarate, I have fixed you dust spots, but unfortunately in the proces, I have also modified the EXIF data, such that I am indicated as the author - it has to do with my presets in Lightroom, and I did not think about that when I offered to help. I have tried to poke around and see if it was simple for me to change the metadata, but it isnt. Should I revert to your revision, or do you want to keep the dust spot removed edit despite the misleading EXIF data? Sorry for the mess! -- Slaunger (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
The perspective is a bit distorted, not much, should be easy to correct. Looks fine, apart from that -- Renardo la vulpo 20:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC) DoneEzarate 23:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Comment Maybe you overdid the correction? I assume that the rectangles in the corners of the plaque are squares, and scaled them accordingly. Your rectangles now are higher than large. Is it like that in the original? -- Renardo la vulpo 20:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC) I tried to reprocess again but it´s realistic the picture, thanks Ezarate 13:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC) In this case it's QI for me. -- Renardo la vulpo 21:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to email@example.com.
↑This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.