Open main menu
English: Welcome to the Commons, Ezarate!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 16:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Contents

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarAzul-calle-06303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The tree on the right is a bit on the dark side. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 19:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarAzul-playa-06316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarAzul-calle-06304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarAzul-playa-06320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but composition is not really attractive --Michielverbeek 07:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frank Robinson, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarAzul-calle-06317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Tilted. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)   Done --Ezarate 16:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)   Comment Overcorrected. Now the houses on both sides lean outwards. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)   Done --Ezarate 18:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)   Comment The house on the left improved a bit, though it is still not completely upright. The houses on the right are still leaning strongly outwards. It should be easy to correct all with Hugin. Unfortunately I have no time to help you before weekend. Perhaps someone else can help. --Johannes Robalotoff 06:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC) See now, I tried with Hugin, Regards!!! --Ezarate 23:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)   Support Now you were successful. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AltarNtraSradelRosario-PortoAlegreBrasil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Could you please eliminate that dust spot I annotated for you? --PtrQs 01:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)   Done thanks!!! --Ezarate 16:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you --PtrQs 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IslaGorriti-bosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piña-IslaGorritiPtadelEste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PuertoPuntadelEstedesdeIslaGorriti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FaroPuntadelEste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Eleuterio Felice Foresti.pngEdit

 
File:Eleuterio Felice Foresti.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Signature of Amedeo Avogadro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Signature of W. S. Merwin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Signature of Eleuterio Felice Foresti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of LU6 Radio Atlántica Mar del Plata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of LU9 Radio Mar del Plata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

User Coats of Arms of Mevlüt KılıçEdit

Hola Ezarate. Obrigad@ for what you did with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fictional Coats of Arms of Mevlüt Kılıç.png. Can you do something similar with File:User Coats of Arms of Mevlüt Kılıç.svg also, please? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 13:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Radio 10, Argentina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

User:BSRFEdit

Hi again. I see that User:BSRF can be made autopatroller. If you agree please do the necessary. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Please, request it in Commons:Requests for rights to reach a consensus Ezarateesteban 17:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of LV1 Radio Colón, Argentina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Radio Mitre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of FM Santa María de las Misiones.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Volume923DailyTelegraph.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Volume923DailyTelegraph.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Club Central Olimpico Argentino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of FIFA World Cup 1978.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Club Atletico Juventud de Pergamino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Andes Talleres Sport Club.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Club Olimpo de Bahía Blanca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:WhatOurGirlsAreDoing.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:WhatOurGirlsAreDoing.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Huracán de Tres Arroyos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Juventud Antoniana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:TarjetasubeJJO.pngEdit

 
File:TarjetasubeJJO.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Invalid license
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Piotr Bart (talk) 15:02, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:"Wind Mountain" Columbia R - NARA - 102278851 (page 1).png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:"Wind Mountain" Columbia R - NARA - 102278851 (page 1).png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChevroletAgileLsTandil-may2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renault12Tandil-may2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 18:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Racing de Trelew.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaEscuela1AyacuchoBsAs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Canal 9 Buenos Aires between 1984-1995.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Televisión Pública Argentina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Logo Mundial 78.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 07:49, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Florencia EtchevesEdit

Hola Ezarate La foto que ilustra el artículo 'Florencia Etcheves' de la Wikipedia en castellano, que en la descripción dice "Trabajo propio", ¿realmente la tomaste vos? Porque definitivamente parece una selfie, y en ese caso la autoría de la foto sería de la señorita Etcheves.

Gracias por el aviso!! procese el otrs la subi y me olvide de terminar la tarea Ezarateesteban 13:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Copa América 2019.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:GBr Log 1.jpgEdit

Hey Ezarate. I don't understand why you want to keep the jpg version. Both files are identical and the jpg version is not used. So normally the SVG version is be used and the others would be deleted. So why do you want to keep the jpg version? --Malo95 (talk) 09:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Two files has differents authors, so the authorship must be keeped Ezarateesteban 12:51, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of Villa Dálmine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaIglesiaJuarez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

GraciasEdit

Hola Esteban, como ya les indiqué a algunos bibliotecarios por correo, esta era mi última petición de desbloqueo. Agradezco que hayas reflejado con presteza vuesto "consenso" y, sobre todo, te agradezco esto. Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 09:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

De nada Ezarateesteban 11:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Hola Esteban, yo también lo he consultado y no he encontrado el consenso necesario para seguir absteniéndome de editar. Así que, dado que no pienso volver a pedir desbloqueo ninguno, y siguiendo el primer y el quinto pilares, que como bibliotecario tan bien conoces, te comunico mi decisión de volver a la edición en la wikipedia en español, después de casi cinco años. Un cordial saludo y gracias por tu comprensión --Discasto talk 22:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC) PS: explicado aquí y aquí
Bueno hombre, trata de no hacer mucho daño porque en Meta te pueden recibir con los brazos abiertos Ezarateesteban 23:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andant train station in 1910's.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tucumán train station of Central Norte railway in 1910's.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casa de Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, under construction, circa 1890.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of Chacarita Cemetery in 1891.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:El Alto Photomontage V1.jpgEdit

Description
English: Photomontage of El Alto City, La Paz, Bolivia.
Date
Source El Pais (Tarija's news) [1]; Wiphala Community Housing © Courtesy of Ivan Flores [2]; Ciudad Satelite/Satellite City...The last image is of my authorship; Platea Central[3]
Author Ande Vega

Ande Vega * talk 20:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SeñaldeTransitoPendienteAscendenre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DiqueElJumeal-Catamarca 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Retrato inventado de Smithson TennantEdit

Hola, Ezarate. He visto una imagen errónea en Wikimedia Commons, que ha dado lugar a errores en páginas de varias Wikipedias en diversos idiomas.

Como antecedentes, hay dos científicos de nombre parecido, James Smithson y Smithson Tennant. Por el primero, le dieron el nombre al mineral smithsonita, y por el segundo se lo dieron a la tennantita. El primero era un "hombre de mundo" con dinero, y fundó el Museo Smithsoniano. El segundo, un químico bastante retraído, que descubrió los elementos osmio e iridio. De James Smithson se conservan varios retratos, pero de Smithson Tennant no se conoce ninguno, y es casi seguro que no exista. Ahora, el problemaː En Wikimedia Commons, en diversas wikipedias, y en decenas/cientos de páginas externas, aparece un supuesto retrato de Smitson Tennant. El de Wikimedia Commons, que es el origen de todos, procede según parece de Televisión Española (vaya fuenteǃǃ) y es simplemente la copia en sepia del retrato al óleo del James Smithson, el del Smithsonian. Puedes comprobarlo por ejemplo comparando las dos páginas en wikipedia en español. Los ingleses saben que no existe el tal retrato, y en su Wikipedia ponen una placa de la calle donde vivió Tennant. Te pido que elimines el retrato inventado de Smithson Tennant en Wikipedia Commons. Eso lo haría desaparecer de las páginas de las wikipedias que lo usan?

Gracias y saludos

Bergminer (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logo of FM Santa María de las Misiones.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Wikimaniadia5byEzarate.jpgEdit

 
File:Wikimaniadia5byEzarate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ата (talk) 13:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AnnaTorresenWikimania2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StockholmCentralStationInterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StockholmCentralStationinterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peatonal-Estocolmo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VistaCityHallEstocolmo.2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry, Too bright, may be perspective problem at the right, CAs, sky very bright, sharpness could be (a little bit) better. --XRay 05:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC) @XRay: see now, please Ezarate 22:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  Support Oh! Much better. Thank you. --XRay 16:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MuseoSuecodeHistoriaNatural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

It seems to be tilted at the bottom. --XRay 09:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 21:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, but there is still a perspective issue. Please have a look to the lines at the top and the bottom. May be there is a additional barrel distortion. --XRay 05:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 21:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 05:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VentanasenEstocolmo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Please fix the perspective. --XRay 09:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)  Done Ezarate 21:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
IMO the perspective is OK now. But for this kind of photograph the windows should be centered. It more space at the right than the left and more at the top than the bottom. --XRay 05:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 21:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 05:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Borrado de imágenes con texto básicoEdit

Hola Esteban. Quería pedirte ayuda y opinión. Ayer me borraron dos imágenes creadas por mi, 1 y 2 (el texto en distintas posiciones). Las hice con Photoshop, un texto básico, con una fuente estándar, con un fondo degradado sencillo y que era para ilustrar los artículos sobre una serie de televisión de varias wikipedias. Al parecer violaba el copyright porque decían que era una captura de pantalla como esta. Estaba explicado en la descripción y tambien lo dejé en las discusiones, pero nadie me ha respondido ni las han borrado. Por favor, podrías revisar el caso para aclararme si he vulnerado las políticas. Gracias por tu tiempo. Saludos. --Geom (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Geom: Pues estamos al límite del umbral de originalidad, mejor una consulta Ezarateesteban 21:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UniversidadeEstocolmo-campus2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PuenteenEstocolmo-Suecia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

The dust spot in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 07:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 22:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Underexposed imo. --ArildV 04:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Per Arild. --Ermell 08:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 18:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BomberosRauch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BomberosRauch-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PuenteenEstocolmo1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

The dust spot is here as well. --Ermell 07:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 22:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)<br Underexposed imo --ArildV 04:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
I agree with Arild. --Ermell 08:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 18:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
And the building on the left sould be vertical. --Ermell 07:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 21:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
But you reduced the brightness again. --Ermell 09:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 23:32, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Signature of Nicolás Der Agopian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nicolás der Agopian, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
  1. El Alto celebra 34 años de creación, El Alto 34th anniversary.
  2. Welcome to Wiphala: Bolivia's Incredibly Colorful Community Housing Project, Culture Trip, HARRY STEWART UPDATED in 19 JUNE 2017.
  3. HISTORIA DE EL ALTO, Huayna Potosi in the background.
Return to the user page of "Ezarate".