Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cuban Red Crab (Gecarcinus ruricola), Bahía de Cochinos.jpg

File:Cuban Red Crab (Gecarcinus ruricola), Bahía de Cochinos.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2015 at 22:40:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods
Info created, uploaded and nominated by P.Lindgren -- P.Lindgren (talk) 22:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P.Lindgren (talk) 22:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's some CA at the scissors (is that the right word in this context?) and the sharpness is not convincing, either. The noise level is high but still acceptable. A nice picture in thumbnail size but not completely convincing at 100%. --Code (talk) 05:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice pose. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurry (camera shaking?), shallow DOF ~~and noisy~~. --Laitche (talk) 12:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition and colors. Quality is OK for a live animal. Yann (talk) 13:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but noisy, blurry and a distracting background. Very pity ... --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Laitche and Alchemist-hp.--Jebulon (talk) 15:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I noticed that I had accidently set the noise slider in lightroom to 0 (from default 25) which explains the noise. I've now uploaded a new copy that should look much better. While I agree that the background is a bit distracting I wanted to show the crab in it's natural habitat. -- P.Lindgren
Oppose Per Alchemist, the blurred upper background is distracting, natural environment or not. Daniel Case (talk) 22:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, too unsharp overall, besides that a nice photo. --Tremonist (talk) 13:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Isasza (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]