Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Börnste, Teiche in der Heubachniederung, Baum -- 2020 -- 3500-4.jpg
File:Dülmen, Börnste, Teiche in der Heubachniederung, Baum -- 2020 -- 3500-4.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2021 at 13:00:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
- I withdraw my nomination created and uploaded by XRay - nominated by -- Commonists 13:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Commonists 13:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for nominating the photograph. --XRay 💬 13:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Ok, I fixed the page creation error for you, hope it works now. But please also fill in the right section for the nom for the gallery from Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany, otherwise the bot won't know where to place it. You do it by using the #. Like: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Name of section. --Cart (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I don't really know either, I'll look into it now, thanks. --Commonists 13:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- If you look at "Location" on the file page where it says: "Location= Börnste < Kirchspiel < Dülmen < Coesfeld < Münster Government Region < North Rhine-Westphalia < Germany < Europe", it might give you a clue. ;-) --Cart (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- I've fixed it for you. "Hausdülmen" is not a section on that page, but "North Rhine-Westphalia" is. --Cart (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral A little bit disturbs me the tilted path. -- -donald- (talk) 07:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- BTW: The path isn't tilted. Sometimes such things are real. --XRay 💬 12:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose This one failed and I notice the same issues here. Burnt parts in the sky and colors alteration -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- BTW: The colors aren't altered. But it's a tone-mapped image from a HDRI. --XRay 💬 12:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- XRay, some of your contrejours are really great when the light is well managed. Unfortunately here the sky is unmistakably cooked. Full white, no texture, burnt. Maybe some frames were missing in your HDRI work. Moreover, several parts of the tree are red or reddish, especially around these blown highlights. Red is not the natural color of this trunk, thus color alteration. In addition to these critics, I want to say that I find the DoF rather low, because you were close to the tree, and thus the background is blurry, in addition to be cooked. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- It was an interesting afternoon with special light conditions. The background, the sky, is (or was) real. The HDRI technique was used the improve the tree itself. The tree would be very dark. But I'll have a look to the unnatural colors. --XRay 💬 13:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Perhaps a nice afternoon, but 3:50 pm, according to the metadata, is too early in my opinion to shoot against the sun. Nevertheless, if the speed of your camera is fast enough, you can get a sky without white parts, as far as I know, and branches that are not reddish. The HDRI process after, just consists in adjusting the light between your most exposed frame and the less exposed one, doesn't it? -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- BTW I met exactly the same problem two weeks ago with a nomination of mine on Wikipedia. The issue was successfully solved. Check your RAWs, maybe it's fixable? -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- For a image taken as HDRI the edges are always a little bit difficult. With the light of the sun the edges of the branches are a little bit overexposed. I'll try to take another shot in the future. And: Afternoon, yes. Just a little bit more than an hour to sunset. I'll try to take the next shot just before sunset. (And a lower position to reduce the visible part of the path.) First, I'll try to fix the current problems with another HDRI tool. --XRay 💬 13:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- I made a redevelopment. IMO it's a good QI. For FP I should take another shot. --XRay 💬 13:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- My opinion to be honest: trunk better, sky worse -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- You're right. Again: Minor improvements, QI yes, but another shot could be a good FPC. (And this photograph is still better than the version before. So it's an improvement.) --XRay 💬 14:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- You say it's better, but look at the upper part, some leaves disappeared behind the highlight area -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes. I made the dark parts at the raw a little bit brighter. I think it's the result. I can improve the leaves, other parts will loose. The solution is IMO to take another shot within the next months. --XRay 💬 14:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Very appealing composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much unsharpness in the background. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination--Commonists 11:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Before I forget: Thank you for the nomination! --XRay 💬 11:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)