Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dn nasva 0854.jpg
File:Dn nasva 0854.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2011 at 12:09:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by WikedKentaur - uploaded by WikedKentaur - nominated by WikedKentaur -- WikedKentaur (talk) 12:09, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral -- WikedKentaur (talk) 12:09, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support Great timing to get the flagman of the race in the background. Royalbroil 13:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support considering thas has high EV for a wikipedia article like Ice yachting. Ggia (talk) 15:54, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support perfect composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support A cool image: cold job and nice photograph. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:54, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Slaunger (talk) 22:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
SupportBeautiful image, but image size is very low, I hadn't noticed, therefore I changed my vote. I still think quality is ok for my taste, but what about the suggestion of not posting below 2 Mp? Was this downsampled? --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image quality looks surprisingly fine despite the small filesize/imagesize ratio. Come to think about it, I think it's fine. That picture is mostly plain pale blue and white, so there's no so much information inside. - Benh (talk) 09:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Below 2 Mp? It is 8 Mpixels? Do you mean that the file size is very low? --Slaunger (talk) 15:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I meant 2 Mb. Size is 445 Kb. --Paolo Costa (talk) 21:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- The size isn't important, only the resolution must be > 2MP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- File size may sometimes be important as the jpeg file size (roughly speaking) increases with increasing information in the photo (intended subject and non-intentional noise). A low file size can be indicative of too aggressive jpeg compression, upsampling or excessive noise reduction, or in this (not a problem) case due to large homogenuous areas with little "diff" in the background. Since a small file size may be alright for some images, we do not have a guideline for it. --Slaunger (talk) 21:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- In that case, I Support this picture, I had misunderstood the guidelines from the first day, thanks for clarifying. --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- The size isn't important, only the resolution must be > 2MP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I meant 2 Mb. Size is 445 Kb. --Paolo Costa (talk) 21:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support Tamba52 (talk) 06:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 07:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support Trongphu (talk) 23:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Claritas (talk) 22:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports