Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Earth 300 vessel design.jpg

File:Earth 300 vessel design.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2021 at 11:09:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Engineering
Info created by Iddes Yachts for the Earth 300 organization - uploaded by MartinPoulter - nominated by MartinPoulter -- MartinPoulter (talk) 11:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinPoulter (talk) 11:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great concept study. I am looking forward to the first pictures after the planned ship launch. (Pity that it is cropped tightly on the left side) -- Radomianin (talk) 11:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support An extraordinary yacht --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 20:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 17:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wait, so what is this? A [partially?] CG model Photoshopped onto a real photo? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, there's no link to the source. But looking at the other versions on Google, the colors here seem manipulated (background gray and boat + sea pink). -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No need for such a tight crop in an illustration. Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose if this were a photo of a real ship in this setting, I would support. But it's a promotional mock-up. There are rare cases when I would support such a nomination, e.g. a model of a planned city, with strong historical value. But not an advertisement for a yacht. Perhaps if it's notable it's a FP on enwiki. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per Rhododendrites. Yann (talk) 15:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I might support if the background could be identified. Otherwise, I may oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop at the left is too tight, the photomontage unbalanced and artificial (I would have preferred either a full 3D-model or better a real photo), and this luxury yacht not my taste -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. Cmao20 (talk) 08:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Agree with Rhododendrites. MartinD (talk) 14:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. I have nothing against private concerns uploading free images of cool new projects they've got going. But that doesn't make their rendering an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 22:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]