Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Facade of the Palace Hotel, San Francisco.jpg

File:Facade of the Palace Hotel, San Francisco.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2017 at 22:42:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by dllu -- dllu (t,c) 22:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 22:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Since walls like this are used to test lenses for distortion, I can't help but notice it isn't perfectly regular. Do you have a lens profile you can apply in your raw conversion software? Have you considered making a b&w version -- the lighting isn't a feature here, nor the sky interesting, and you are left with a study of patterns and form, which works well in b&w. -- Colin (talk) 08:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have the lens distortion profile. I have either forgotten to apply it or there is some residual perspective distortion on the left side. Anyhow, the distortion is extremely small, much less than Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:128 Balconies of 1390 Market Street, San Francisco.jpg which has several supports even though it has a large amount of barrel distortion, especially visible in the bottom corners. Compared to that nomination, this photo also has similar lighting and a vastly more architecturally significant, interesting building. dllu (t,c) 11:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just being picky. Not an oppose reason. I haven't really decided if there's enough wow here for FP. -- Colin (talk) 12:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Info I've just replaced the image with the version with lens correction profiles. It should be well corrected now. dllu (t,c) 20:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm OK with this. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Boring. Charles (talk) 11:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Monochrome version. dllu (t,c) 20:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:20, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 10:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]