Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fondazione Passaré - 051 - Repubblica Democratica del Congo - Maschera Salampasu.jpg

File:Fondazione Passaré - 051 - Repubblica Democratica del Congo - Maschera Salampasu.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2012 at 11:27:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Salampasu mask. Photo by Fondazione Passaré - uploaded and nominated by M.casanova -- M.casanova (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- M.casanova (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marcok (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:40, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too bright areas, I don't think the composition is good enough and that the background makes a perfect contrast, and generally no wow. Tomer T (talk) 04:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Iopensa (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sachi85 (talk) 19:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment is not specified where the mask stored? in Milan? Savona? also should be categorized the best: Category:African Art Collection of Fondazione Passaré specifying that it is a foundation established in Italy where it stores its works --Pava (talk) 17:45, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Info added artwork template and institution template --M.casanova (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pava (talk) 18:48, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Background and light don't convince me for Featured picture. QI IMHO, but Featured picture? --T137(talk) 14:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment canvassing? Tomer T (talk) 14:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I don't know whether someone is asking for votes. What I do know is it was asked whether a simple link to the vote page to the Italian VP here was fine, and nobody complained about that. If this is not ok, please let us know by linking to the relevant policy page, thanks :) --Elitre (talk) 15:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not clean enough for FP. --99of9 (talk) 15:16, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality for studio work. Areas of overexposure, bad lighting. Definition too low. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unattractive bluish reflections, not entirely sharp. --Cayambe (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 06:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]