Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gorna Leshnica Shara.jpg

File:Gorna Leshnica Shara.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2015 at 21:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Gadjowsky - uploaded by Gadjowsky - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Excellent composition and colors. There is some minor posterization in the sky and chromatic aberration in the mountains. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice view and light but not so details (unsharp) and oversaturation plus CAs, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Heartwrenching oppose Such a great shot.. Such a great angle. Such great light. Such great colors ... until you see that patch of just not-quite-right blue in the sky on the right. And then all the unsharpness and CA, and you want to cry. "Where did it go wrong?" you find yourself asking. Well, shooting it at anything below f/11 was a start. And with ISO 200, to boot. Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel. "f/11 ISO 200"! Bollocks. -- Colin (talk) 15:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Daniel Case, I'm afraid. Though I'm not sure whether f/8 and ISO 200 are really to blame here. What a pity! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Excellent composition and colors but not very good quality --LivioAndronico talk 09:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Gadjowsky, Kiril Simeonovski Something went wrong with equipement i suppose. This is second serie of great photos ruined by something. I see its made with D5100 series, nothing wrong with EXIF. D5100 has affected series with sensor position, find it on forum and check serial Number of camera. Some made it on their own, hex key solved it. I would try with some other lens first too see if it repeats and its not the lens. --Mile (talk) 12:30, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the problem is processing, not just softness/CA. Were the frames taken at the same exposure or was too much post-processing applied? Polarising lens? -- Colin (talk) 15:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]