Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hong Kong Railway Route Map ring.pdf

File:Hong Kong Railway Route Map ring.pdf, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2016 at 09:20:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Maps
Info created by Sameboat - uploaded by Sameboat - nominated by Sameboat -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 09:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hong Kong MTR (metro system) diagram in distorted concentric ring pattern. PDF version is created to better represents author's intention of the source SVG due to technical limitations of rendering SVG on Wikimedia. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 09:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I myself have created much more complex images that this and have had no problems with mediawiki rendering. If the SVG is validated, I see no inconvenience and I think you should try to import this in Inkscape and get a clean SVG. --The Photographer (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your nomination. I'm guessing you want us to judge the shapes of the map as art? If so, I'm sorry, but I don't find it compelling enough to feature. Oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can’t see anything special in that either. Most route maps of public transport are simplified and schematised in a similar way. – (I once came across a map of hiking routes in the Lake District designed like the London Underground map. Nice idea!) --Kreuz schnabel 10:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hight EV, however, try make it SVG. PDF is for documents --The Photographer (talk) 13:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per the Photographer. I will not consider on the merits unless it is nominated in a more customary image format. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Verde78 (talk) 11:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. I'm not seeing anything visually striking about this. INeverCry 03:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Kreuz schnabel 19:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]