Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Island Peak Summit Approach.jpg

File:Island Peak Summit Approach.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2009 at 15:26:31

Info created by Mountaineer - uploaded by Mountaineer - nominated by Mountaineer -- Mountaineer 15:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mountaineer 15:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can an IP nominate an image? Although I'm assuming it's Mountaineer, who has forgotten to log in. Also, the problem of the Blue Snow rears it's tinted head again. 203.35.135.133 16:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP can nominate the image, but cannot vote on the image--Mbz1 (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did nominate it, but forgot to log in. Modified metadata to reflect that. -- Mountaineer (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, there are about 50 (mainly military themed) images I've found so far that I think deserve a chance at FP. I'm assuming it would be a bad idea to nominate them all at once? =} 203.35.135.133 18:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support White balance might be improved. but it is a great image.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Very poor quality, with wrong white balance, noisy sky and little detail -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's fascinating of course but the quality isn't the best, sorry. The brute dynamic range which isn't avoidable produces a unreal exposure of the sky. Making a pseudo DRI from a RAW exposure serie could help displaying the whole dynamic range (at least I would have done it) but for that you have to meassure the sky before shooting. --Richard Bartz (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Avjoska (talk) 10:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Crapload (talk) 22:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Richard Bartz --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 21:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

edit 1, not featured

Support--Mbz1 (talk) 02:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sky is kinda noisy, but still. —kallerna™ 13:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's fascinating of course but the quality isn't the best, sorry. The brute dynamic range which isn't avoidable produces a unreal exposure of the sky. Making a pseudo DRI from a RAW exposure serie could help displaying the whole dynamic range (at least I would have done it) but for that you have 2 meassure the sky before shooting. --Richard Bartz (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic !--Savant-fou (talk) 21:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Richard Bartz --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 21:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]