Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Jim Jim Creek -- 2019 -- 4239.jpg

File:Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Jim Jim Creek -- 2019 -- 4239.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2020 at 06:42:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Australia
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 06:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 06:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I wish you could have gotten reflections of the treetops of the tall trees in the photo, but these kinds of things can be overemphasized, and I find it very pretty and good to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but I'm not wowed by this, cropped reflections doesn't help either. --Ivar (talk) 17:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Ivar Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good photo but no FP for me. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Was a bit unsure about this one – it’s a nice scenery but the crop is just too arbitrary, Ivar nailed it. The trees look definitely overexposed. --Kreuz schnabel 07:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a pity because there is a lot of potential but the crop does not work for me. --Dinkum (talk) 11:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Should have been a clear slam dunk FP, but missed. Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per the other opposers. Nice view overall, but the cropped reflections are indeed disturbing and in general is it not absolutely stunning to me. --Domob (talk) 16:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]