Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Main Rock in Pigeon Island National Park.jpg

File:Main Rock in Pigeon Island National Park.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2019 at 03:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info All by AntanO -- Antan O 03:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Antan O 03:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't really get it. There are also technical issues such as lack of sharpness and oversaturation --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not very wowing for me. Per Martin, the sharpness is lacking and there are other technical issues. This just isn't FP level for me, sorry--BoothSift 05:52, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Thinking of it as an exercise in composition: I like the interplay of the rock and the cloud, although it feels a bit crammed over-all (probably due to how the rock is cut on the right). Unfortunately, the main subject itself does not look very interesting. --El Grafo (talk) 08:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I don't like the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Vulp here 10:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Martin. --Cart (talk) 15:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Millennium bug (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, the oversaturation and slight unsharpness is too much of a problem. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo – Lucas ^T 15:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated sky (clouds should never have bluish fringes like that) and awkward composition (it is screaming to be a horizontal). Daniel Case (talk) 21:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate constructive criticisms. But, I looked at some of your images and I don't know your 'review' methods. I'd ask at your talk page. --Antan O 02:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can always ask at COM:CRIT before nominating here, that is the place for such discussions. For knowing what some of the reviewer comments mean, please look at COM:PT which is also a page where you can get a lot of tips about more advanced photography. A good place to start with your photos is also COM:QIC. At QIC, you will get comments about and learn the technical requirements for photos here. Once you get a hang of that you can move on to FPC where the photos are also reviewed for artistic impression or what we for short call "wow". --Cart (talk) 10:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Booth sift 05:52, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]