Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mens' ballroom shoes, Eurodance CZ.jpg

File:Mens' ballroom shoes, Eurodance CZ.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2009 at 03:17:28

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Martin Kozák -- Martin Kozák (talk) 03:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Kozák (talk) 03:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 07:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 13:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Jagro (talk) 15:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A good picture but I do not see anything special that can make a pair of shoes featured, sorry :( --Muhammad 16:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't see anything to convince me to vote for oppose. --Aktron (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Muhammad (no wow). —kallerna™ 14:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shoes could be used to throw at important politicians I guess, but otherwise, lets leave this one out. Zul32 (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not bad, but nothing special. --Dezidor (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose should be nominated for "Quality Image"... not FP Dcubillas (talk) 03:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Dcubillas. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose badly arranged, I would say that laces should be arrange better. Even the left shoe is quite damaged--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 09:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose: I think an image of ballroom shoes could be featured, if they were being worn and on a dance floor and perhaps with the woman's shoes as well. The footwork involved in ballroom dances like the foxtrot or quickstep is quite complex at competition level and I imagine would make an interesting picture. As it is, there isn't enough interest here for a FP. Maedin\^talk 13:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --staka.^talk 20:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. --Karel (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]