Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de São Bento, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg

File:Monasterio de São Bento, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2017 at 12:59:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Brazil
Info All by The Photographer 12:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Very pretty, but not quite sharp enough to me for an FP monastery interior. Would you like to try sharpening more? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I applied more sharpening and It was a HDR of 3x(3 exposition +5/0/-5 images), please, take a look what do you think. I know that this lens usually is less sharp than a nikkor 35mm 1.8f or a 50mm 1.8f DX. I am not applying any downsizing to this image. --The Photographer 13:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it's definitely better. I'll live with the photo for a while and not vote yet. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support J e e 13:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I thought its Orthodox, with some cyrillic script - IC-XC, but latin in bottom. Interior is more Orthodox, and then i saw its Catholic with mix of Ravenna mosaics. Pretty a mess. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mile, This Church has a "particular" design by Adelberto Gressnigt with a Beuron Art School style. Thanks for your remark :) --The Photographer 13:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support But please add a geocode --Code (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --The Photographer 14:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 17:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality. Charles (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 19:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job, there is not much room for improvement here Poc o² 20:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support A positive surprise to see in full resolution, and thanks for not downsampling! Very nice colors and lightning and quite natural looking. Well executed. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support lNeverCry 02:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 13:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, great job! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /J e e 13:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Brazil