Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opernturm.jpg

File:Opernturm.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2010 at 22:11:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Der Wolf (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Der Wolf (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - there's a lot I like about this image, but there is a strange artifact to the left of the streetlamp. Can this be fixed? Jonathunder (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done;) -- Der Wolf (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's still an arm hanging in space between the left frame and a streetlamp. Jonathunder (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Support : extremely detailed, sharp, well lit and well balanced, with an unfortunate ghost on the leftmost edge. May I suggest, in addition, that a suitable template such as Template:FoP-Germany be added to the file ? --MAURILBERT (discuter) 01:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ changed vote, see below. sharpness and details are great, thats true. but for my taste the perspective correction is overdone at this one. Sorry. --mathias K 07:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per mathias - the perspective looks unnatural --Schnobby (talk) 08:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info A few minutes ago, I uploaded a IMO better version. I think, that the perspective now looks quite natural;) -- Der Wolf (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

perspective is ok, but now its tilted ccw. When this is corrected... bgmathias K 15:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I can't see any tilt.. -- Der Wolf (talk) 16:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how, but it's gone. Now it is a grat picture with awesome sharpness and it shows the building really good. changed my vote, now Support! bg mathias K 16:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose subject and perspective have no wow for me. --Taraxacum (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Overdone perspective correction. Building in photo has parallel edges, but the eye expects it to show perspective (the more distant top to appear narrower), so the result is an optical illusion making the building in the photo look wider at the top. - MPF (talk) 12:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 17:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]